Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suryodhan Tyagi and Anr. vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1340/2024 SURYODHAN TYAGI AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State. Ms. Astha and Ms. Megha Singh Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners when the matter wastaken up. Even on the last date of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the petitioners.2. It seems that the petitioners herein are not interested to pursue thepresent petition any further.3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JAPRIL 29, 2026/vc/gjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Serv...
Kedar Singh @ Suraj vs the State Govt Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 853/2026 KEDAR SINGH @ SURAJ .....Applicant Through: Mr. Rohit Boora, Ms. Swati Rathee, Ms. Prem Sood, Ms. Chetishtha Malik, Ms. Priyadarshani and Mr. Sachin, Advs.versusTHE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates with SI Preeti Dhankar, PS: Budh Vihar Mr. Sarthak Karol, SC with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadhauria, Ms. Tanishka Pawar, Advs. for ComplainantCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 482 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.509/2025 dated 29.11.2025 registered at PS.: Budh Vihar, New Delhi under Sections 74/75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.2. Considering the assertions made...
Seema Fatima vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporati ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3294/2022, CM APPL. 9565/2022SEEMA FATIMA.....Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Neelakash Sharma and Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Advocates.versusDELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Amaan Khan and Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. In deference to the observations made by the Court, Mr. RajivKumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 152 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.2. He, however, submits that in case the grievance is not fully mitigatedhe may further granted liberty to take appropriate recourse.3. The submissions made by Mr. Rajiv Kumar, learned counselappearing on behalf of the petitioner seems to be reasonable, accordingly,the petiti...
Vivek Malhotra vs Shilpa Sood
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 74/2026, CM APPL. 14521/2026, CM APPL.VIVEK MALHOTRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vaibhav Vatts, DHCLSC (through VC) Mr. Vivek Malhotra, Appellant in person.versusSHILPA SOOD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned Counsel, Mr. Vaibhav Vatts, appointed by the Delhi HighCourt Legal Services Committee for the appellant, is discharged, as the appellant wishes to argue his case in person.2. Accordingly, Mr. Vaibhav Vatts, Advocate, stands discharged from thepresent matter.3. Mr. Vivek Malhotra, appellant herein, appears in person and states thathe has no grievance in case his suit under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act is decided uninfluenced by any other independent proceedings pending between the parties before any other court.4. We entrust the learned Family Court to proceed to decide the su...
Rahul Gupta vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 904/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 542/2026 RAHUL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).VersusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Anita Bisht, Advs. along with SI Vishal Rana.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking grant ofregular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 479/2024, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the present FIRwas registered on the complaint of the complainant, alleging therein that she had been cheated by the applicant of an amount of 6,00,000/- on the pretext of arranging a job.3. The learned counsel appearing f...
Ms Golden Chariot Hospitality Service Pvt Ltd vs Delhi Metro Rail Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 509/2026, I.A. 7858/2026 & I.A. 7859/2026MS GOLDEN CHARIOT HOSPITALITY SERVICE PVTLTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Mr. Aman Qayoom Wani & Mr. Mayank, Advs.versusDELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rhea Verma, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.04.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that the respondent allotted commercial premises atAnand Vihar Metro Station to the petitioner through a letter of acceptance, later amended, followed by execution of a 20-year Lease Agreement on 02.05.2024. Possession was handed over on 17.05.2024 with a six-month rent moratorium. Soon after, on 28.06.2024, the petitioner discovered severe leakage and seepage in the premises. A joint inspection on 04.07.2024...
Karan Arora vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1181/2026 KARAN ARORA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Ashwani Jha, Adv. (throughVC)versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates with Insp. Amit Kr., PS: Palam with Complainant in person Mr. Sarthak Karol, SC with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadhauria, Ms. Tanishka Pawar and Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advs. for LRs of deceasedCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw thepresent bail application.2. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JAPRIL 29, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:14:12...
Geeta Devi vs State/N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1216/2026 GEETA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Goel, AdvocateversusSTATE/N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Anita Bisht, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.(BAIL) 772/2026 (for interim bail)1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission towithdraw the present application.2. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.BAIL APPLN. 1216/20263. The next date of hearing in the bail application is 12.05.2026.However, the matter is preponed.4. The matter is taken up for hearing today.5. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking grant ofregular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 412/2023, registered at Police Station Ashok Vihar, Delhi, for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Co...
Ex Ct. (Cook) Sushil Kharwar vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4017/2026 EX CT. (COOK) SUSHIL KHARWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Adv. forUOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner assailsOrders dated 31.07.2024 and 17.02.2025 issued by the Respondents and seeks direction for reinstatement into service with all consequential benefits. By way of Order dated 31.07.2024 [hereinafter referred to as IO-1], the service of the Petitioner, who was serving as a Constable (Cook) in the Border Security Force (BSF), came to be terminated. Aggrieved thereby, the Petitioner submitted a representation challenging the validity of IO-1, however, the same also came to be rejected by way of Order dated 17.02.2025 [hereinafter referred to as IO-2].2. Pithily put, in the year...
Jatin Bhatnagar vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1095/2026& CRL.M.A. 8283/2026 & CRL.M.A. JATIN BHATNAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Dhingra with Mr.Mehzabeen Khan, Mr. Yousuf Karim, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Sachin Kumar, W/SI Jyoti, PS Amar Colony Ms. Sumitra Choudhary, Mr. M.K. Raghav Raman, Ms. Nitya Sharma and Ms. Jasmine Sheikh, Advocates for prosecutrix (through V.C.) prosecutrix in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0064/2026 dated 04.02.2026,registered at P.S. Amar Colony, for commission of offences under Section 376 IPC and Sections 69/89 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, (BNS).2. When the matter was taken up by this Court on 18.03.2026, the followingfacts were recorded:-2. According to learned counsel for applicant, the parties were in a consensual love-relationship which, e...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »