Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balwan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-22* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 130/2017 BALWAN SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS ....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gauravjeet Narwan, Advocate for respondent no. 2 (DMRC) .CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed ...
Smirti Grover vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 127/2017 SMIRTI GROVER .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gauravjeet Narwan, Advocate for respondent no. 2 (DMRC) .CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Si...
M/S Relaxo Footwears Ltd vs Union of India & Ros
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026Uploaded on : 04.05.2026 + LA.APP. 227/2017, CM APPL. 20214/2025 JAI KISHAN GUPTA ....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Udaibir Singh, Ms. Tulna Rampal, Ms. Samvartika Pathak, Mr. Utsav Garg, Mr. Pushkar Khanna, and Ms. Nikita Gupta, Advocates. Mr. Badal Dayal and Mr. Nishi Chauhan, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRC. + LA.APP. 158/2017 M/S RELAXO FOOTWEARS LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Udaibir Singh, Ms. Tulna Rampal, Ms. Samvartika Pathak, Mr. Utsav Garg, Mr. Pushkar Khanna and Ms. Nikita Gupta, Advocates. By:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI LA.APP. 227/2017 & 15...
Simi Gupta vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-21* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 129/2017 SIMI GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gauravjeet Narwan and Ms.Anchal Singh, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally ...
Ram Bilas Garg vs Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 128/2017 RAM BILAS GARG .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gauravjeet Narwan and Ms.Anchal Singh, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally...
M/S Mittal Trading Company and Anr. vs Shri Ashok Kumar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10614/2018 M/S MITTAL TRADING COMPANY AND ANR......Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusSHRI ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nishant Rajara and Ms. Sheetal, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.04.20261. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated06.06.2018 passed by the Tribunal, whereby the petitioner-management is aggrieved by the finding that photocopies of the attendance register produced by the workman are to be treated as primary evidence.2. Learned counsel for the management submits that while themanagement does not deny maintaining the attendance register, it is contended that the same has been lost. It is further submitted that the management has also doubted the photocopies produced by the workman, claiming it to be forged.3. Learned counsel for the workman, on the other hand, submits thatbesides the present workman, other workmen had also approached the...
Sanjay @ Bhim vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~17& 18* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 952/2018 SANJAY @ BHIM STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + CRL.A. 1083/2018 SARVESH KUMAR STATE OF DELHICORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 30.04.20261. Both the appellants are present in person and they have been identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor as per instructions received from the officer on duty.2. Both the appellants submit that, as they have already served the period of imprisonment, they do not want to further prosecute the appeal.3. This Court, through the learned Additional PublicProsecutor, have asked the appellants as to whether they have submitted so after fully understanding the consequences of their submission. Both the appellants reiterated that they do not want to prosecute the appeal.4. In such circumstances, the impugned judgment is confirmed.5. The file be consigned to records. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J APRIL 30, 2026/mj...
Mange Ram Aggarwal vs Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~ J-2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 219/2017, CM APPL. 19786/2022 MANGE RAM AGGARWAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vibhor E. Garg, Mr. Achin Mittal, Mr. Aditya Parmar and Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Jitender Kumar Singh, Ms. Shivpriya, Ms. Anjali, Ms. Harshita Singh Advocates for respondent no. 2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Di...
Prem Kumar & Anr vs Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-93* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 347/2017 PREM KUMAR & ANR .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, Advocates Mr. Badal Dayal, Mr. Surender Wankhede, Ms. Nishi Chauhan, Ms. Rachna Dayal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified ...
Union of India vs Arun Kumar and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-85* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 326/2017 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.versusARUN KUMAR AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Badal Dayal, Mr.Udaibir Singh, Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Ms.Tulna Rampal and Ms.Nikita Gupta, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:M...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »