Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jpg Builders Private Limited vs Djt Retailers Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 27/2026 JPG BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Swaroop, Advocate. (M): 9716643101 Email: [email protected] RETAILERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek E. Kisku with Mr. J. Shivam Kumar, Advocates. (M): 9783678914 Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 30.04.20261. Conciliated Agreement dated 29th April, 2026 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, as per which, the parties have settled their disputes amicably.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the settlement of the disputes, he does not wish to press the present petition.3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MINI PUSHKARNA, J APRIL 30, 2026/cThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code sh...
Sanjida Khatoon vs Municipal Coropration of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 65/2025 & CM APPL. 191/2025 SANJIDA KHATOON .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu, Ms. Kavita and Mr. Piyush Kumar Singh, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL COROPRATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Sneha Roy, Ms. Madhu Yadav & Ms. Gurleen Kaur Sran, Advocates. Ms. Ayushi Jain, Advocate for R-5 (Through video-conferencing)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed alleging that the respondent-MCD has wrongfully demolished the bathroom attached to the jhuggi, without following the principles of natural justice. Further, compensation is also sought for the damages caused on account of the demolition.2. Earlier, a writ petition was filed on behalf of the private respondentno.5, being W.P. (C) 14347/2024, titled Jamuna v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors., complaining against the unauthorised construction ...
Dr Chetan Kohli vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19337/2025 & CM APPL. 80715/2025 DR CHETAN KOHLI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat and Dr. Monisha, Advocates. Petitioner-in-person.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mehrunisa A. Jaitley, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Raghvendra Shukla and Mr. Asra Chandra, Advocates for R-2 (through VC) Mr. Shubham Sharma, Ms. Kajal Sharma and Ms. Nikita Jangir, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to therespondent no.1/MCD, to take action against the ongoing illegal and unauthorized construction, being carried out by the respondent no.3, in the property bearing No. WZ, H-28, Gali No. 9, New Mahavir Nagar, New Delhi.2. Status report has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD, wherein it is stated that after following due process of law, a demolition W.P.(C) 19337/2025 Page 1 of 2ord...
Theme Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd vs National Highways Authority of ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 765/2025, CM APPL. 79163/2025, CM APPL. 79164/2025 & CM APPL. 79165/2025 THEME ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Nandadevi Deka, Mr. Shashwat Pratyush & Ms. Shubhra Sharma, Advocates.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA.....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal & Mr. Ankur Saboo, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 30.04.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant had produced before us theletter dated 16.02.2026 of the General Manager (T)- KNT, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) addressed to the Authorized Signatory of the Appellant. The said letter dated 16.02.2026 is taken on record.3. The said letter states that the Appellate Authority of NHAI had considered the issue and, accordingly, the period of blacklisting / debarment has been revoked w.e.f. 09.02.2026.4. The Appeal stands di...
Shahid Syed Yousuf vs Central Jail No. 10, Rohini & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 128/2025, CRL.M.A. 1068/2025, CRL.M.A. 14513/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14514/2025 SHAHID SYED YOUSUF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nilanjan Dey, Advocate.versusCENTRAL JAIL NO. 10, ROHINI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, SPP with Mr. Khawar Saleem, Advocate for Respondent No.3/NIA.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 30.04.20261. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that since the Petitioner has already been enlarged on bail, the Petition has been rendered infructuous.2. Accordingly, the Petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending Applications also stand disposed of.3. We may observe that we have not adjudicated the issue raised in this Petition on merits. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J APRIL 30, 2026/ AThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scan...
Ali Ahmed Khan vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19371/2025 & CM APPLs. 80776-80777/2025 ALI AHMED KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner (in-Person).versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC with Ms. Aditi Singh, G.P. for R-1. Mr. Nalin Kohli, Senior Advocate with Mr. with Mr. Anshul Malik and Mr. Ayuushmaan Aroraa, Advocates for R-2 & 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.04.20261. This petition is directed against the advertisement dated 15 thNovember, 2025, and seeks a declaration that Clause 9(ii) and Clause 11 thereof are ultra vires and unenforceable, being contrary to the notified Recruitment Rules dated 8th May, 2012.2. During the pendency of the present proceedings, Mr. Ali AhmedKhan, the Petitioner appearing in person, submits that the Council for Leather Exports has issued a fresh advertisement dated 16 th April, 2026. In view thereof, he seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with...
Ms. Amita J Singh vs Ms. Amisha Wallia & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 166/2025& I.A. Nos. 6919/2025, 26027/2025 & 8595/2026 MS. AMITA J SINGH .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Girish Shankar, Advocate (M:7763815998)versusMS. AMISHA WALLIA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Jivika Jolly, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 30.04.2026 I.A. 8595/20261. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff underOrder XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) forpassing of the consent/compromise decree, based on the compromise arrived at between the parties vide Settlement Agreement dated 26th February, 2026.2. The captioned suit has been filed, inter alia, seeking a decree of partition of the estate of Late Dr. Tegendra Singh Walia, as described in the Schedule-A of the plaint.3. During the pendency of the present suit, the parties herein were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre videorder dated 23rd July, 2025 for ...
Avneesh Singh vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4969/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38311/2025 AVNEESH SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Rohan Mittal and Mr. Rohan Bhati, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application, with liberty to file approach the learned Trial Court.2. Application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Pending application also stands disposed of.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 30, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 11:51:46...
Hindalco Industries vs Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative Ltd & Or ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) 354/2012 HINDALCO INDUSTRIES .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vishal Kapoor, Adv.versusINDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZERS COOPERATIVE LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Faran Ahmed, Ms. Tooba Noor, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 29039/2026 (For Withdrawal)1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellant under Order XXIII read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the present appeal.2. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same.3. Vide Order dated 07.08.2012, while issuing notice torespondent No.1 (as respondent Nos.2 to 4 were arbitrators), this Court directed the stay of coercive steps by respondent No.1, subject to deposit of decretal amount within a period of one month.4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that in pur...
Sanjeev Aggarwal vs High Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19382/2025 CM APPL. 80832/2025 SANJEEV AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pratima Gupta and Mr. Brijesh Garg, Mr. Rahul Arya, Advs.versusHIGH COURT OF DELHI .....RespondentThrough: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, SPCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant states that she has instruction to withdraw the petition.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application is also dismissed as having become infructuous. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J APRIL 30, 2026/rkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:33:54...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »