Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Prakash vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 77/2017 JAI PRAKASH .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUD...
Mahender Chawla vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~P-1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 09.04.2026Pronounced on: 30.04.2026Uploaded on: 30.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3345/2025 MAHENDER CHAWLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishank Tyagi, Mr. Mohd. Mubashir and Mr. Manmeet Verma, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with SI Lakhan, PS EOW Mr. Deepak Vashisht, Advocate for Complainants.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 349/2020 dated 01.10.2020, registered at Police Station South Rohini for offences punishable under SectionsFACTS:2. The prosecution has placed a status report dated 11.11.2025 onrecord, and the facts, as emerging therefrom, are as follows: a) For nearly two decades prior to the registration of the present FIR, the accused persons, Ms. Renu Chawla and her husband Mr. Mahender Chawla [applicant herein], had been organizing Committees, inducing ...
Leela Lace Holdings Prviate Limited vs Raheja Developers Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 347/2024 LEELA LACE HOLDINGS PRVIATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pranaya Goyal, Ms. Shachi Udeshi, Ms. Apoorva Kaushik, Ms. Juhi Shahi and Mr. Uday Mathur, Advs.versusRAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gurtejpal Singh and Mr. Saurabh Jha, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 30.04.20261. The present Petition, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed seeking the following reliefs:a) direct the Respondent to deposit the Brand Licensing and Marketing Fee of 4% of the Gross Revenue Sales received on the sale of each Brand Residential Unit by the Respondent in furtherance of the Agreements to Sell executed by it with the Allottees / Purchasers in the Project and as per the details received in the prayer (d) hereinbelow along with the interest at the rate of 12% per annum as per Clause 4.1.2 of the Marketing Agreement;b) di...
Urmil Gupta Through Spa Holder Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta vs Sushil Prakas ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 695/2024, CM APPL. 59049/2024, CM APPL. 59052/2024, CM APPL. 67228/2024, CM APPL. 29939/2025 URMIL GUPTA THROUGH SPA HOLDER SHRI ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.versusSUSHIL PRAKASH GUPTA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that matter has beenamicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 17.09.2025 through Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Delhi High Court, New Delhi.2. Copy of the same is taken on record.3. In terms of Settlement Agreement dated 17.09.2025 between the parties, present Appeal along with pending Applications is disposed of.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.APRIL 30, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is down...
Iqbal Ahamad & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~36 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8005/2025 IQBAL AHAMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sohail Sharma and Ms. Renu Bhardwaj, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP SI Bachchu Ram Mr. Saleem Malik, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 169/2021, dated 07.05.2021, registered at Police Station Tigri, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Saleem Malik, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2.3. The petitioners are present i...
Veena Goel vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-13* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 79/2017 VEENA GOEL .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MA...
Robin Dagar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15197/2025, CM APPL. 62303/2025 & CM APPL. ROBIN DAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Singh, Advocate (through VC)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Khanna and Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocates for R-1. Mr. P.S. Singh, Ms. Annu Singh and Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Akshay, S.I. Mr. Dhananjay Sehrawat, Advocate for R-3 and R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to theMunicipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to take action for sealing and demolition of the illegal construction at Khasra No. 1031 and 1032, Mahipalpur, New Delhi-110037 (subject premises).2. A status report has been handed over in Court on behalf of respondent/MCD. 2.1 The same is taken on record. W.P.(C) 15197/2025 Page 1 of 23. In terms of the said status report, it is stated that demolition actionwas carried o...
Komal Gola vs Rishabh Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ TR.P.(C.) 188/2025 KOMAL GOLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Sisodia, Advocate.versusRISHABH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate (through vc).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 24 of the CPC seeks the followingprayers: a) Transfer the case bearing HMA. No. 1925/2024, titled as Rishabh Kumar V/s Komal Gola, pending in the Court of Sh. Naveen Kumar Kashyap, Judge, Family Court-02, Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi to the competent court of . Judge, Family Court, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi. b) Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, in the interest of justice.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition on account of the fact that compromise has been arrived at between the parties.4. Leave granted.5. The present p...
Savitri vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-11* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 76/2017 SAVITRI .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUDDEEN AN...
Mr. Vineet Kumar Saigal vs Mr. Vijay Kumar Rewal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 723/2025 and I.A. 25334/2025, I.A. 5757/2026 I.A. 6551/2026 MR. VINEET KUMAR SAIGAL .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ritik Sharma and Mr. Shubham, Advocates.versusMR. VIJAY KUMAR REWAL & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Lakshay Dhamija and Mr. Sagar Rawat, Advocates for D1 and D2 with defendant no.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties jointly submit thatduring the pendency of the present suit, the parties have arrived at a settlement, terms whereof have been recorded in the form of settlement agreement dated 25.04.2026 which has been marked as Ex.P1 in the statement of the parties separately recorded by the learned Joint Registrar on 29.04.2026.2. Plaintiff as well as defendant no.2, in their respective statements clearly affirmed the factum of settlement.3. In view of the above settlement, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff see...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »