Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Chand @ Subhash Chandra & Anr. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 12.03.2026Pronounced on : 27.03.2026Uploaded on : 27.03.2026+ FAO 77/2026SUBHASH CHAND @ SUBHASH CHANDRA & ANR......Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Ms. Maanya Saxena, Advocate Ms. Iram Majid, CGSC with Mr. Mohd. Suboor and Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment dated 30.10.2025 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Delhi,(hereinafter as the Tribunal) in Case No. OA/II(U)/DLI/744/2025, titled Subhash Chand @ Subhash Chandra & Anr. v. Union of India.2. Vide the aforesaid judgment, the Tribunal dismissed the claimapplication filed by the appellants on the ground that the that the deceasedFAO 77/2026 Page 1 of 6 was not a bon...
Vishal @ Honey vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 955/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7312/2026VISHAL @ HONEY .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Omkar Sharma and Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentThrough: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 304/2022 dated 28.05.2022, registered at Police Station Subzi Mandi, District North, New Delhi, under Sections2. The status report and Nominal Roll handed up by Mr. YudhvirSingh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, are taken on record.3. After some arguments, Mr. Omkar Sharma, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application, without prejudice to the right of the applicant to move the learned Sessions Court at the appropriate stage.BAIL APPLN. 955/202...
Jeet Dahiya vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 944/2026 JEET DAHIYA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor and Mr. Kaushal Mehta, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Adv. for Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with SI Ravi Rana, Crime BranchCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.03.20261. At the outset, learned ASC for State, has handed over Status Reportin Court qua the verification of the medical documents, which is taken on record. Based thereon he submits that the medical documents dated 14.03.2026 as also 21.03.2026 have been duly verified.2. As per the Status Report, the medical documents/ provisionaldiagnosis slips dated 14.03.2026 as also 21.03.2026 of the petitioner prepared by Dr. Pranab Jain have been duly verified. The same is also accompanied by the letter dated 24.03.2026 regarding verification of the aforesaid medical examination of the petitioner.3. As such, under the sai...
Abubacker E vs National Investigation Agency and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 25.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: 28.03.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 787/2026 ABUBACKER E .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyakam, Mr. Rehan Ghalib Khan, Mr. Abdul Shukoor, Mr. Shereef K.A.and Mohd. Arif Hussain, AdvocatespversusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCYAND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SPP NIA with Mr. Jatin Khatri ASPP, Mr. Vikas Walia, Mr. Amit Rohila, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks issuance ofan appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to shift him, at his own cost, from jail in NIA Case No. 2/2023 arising out of RC-14/2022/NIA/DLI to a well- equipped multi-specialty private hospital such as Indraprastha ApolloW.P.(CRL) 787/2026 Page 1 of 12 or any other private hospital of his choice for further treatment...
Tycoon Credit and Portfolios Limited vs Idfc First Bank Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3851/2026 TYCOON CREDIT AND PORTFOLIOS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utkarsh Shukla, AdvocateversusIDFC FIRST BANK LTD. AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Tripathi, Advocate for respondent no. 1CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.20261. On account of subsequent development and for de-freezing thepetitioners account, Mr. Utkarsh Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.4. If any fresh cause of action arises, the petitioner shall be at liberty totake appropriate recourse.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JMARCH 27, 2026arThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Or...
Sanjay Kumar & Anr. vs Kamlesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 214/2023, CM APPL. 12677-12678/2023 SANJAY KUMAR & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Kalra and Mr. Gaurav Chaudhry, Advocates.versusKAMLESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.03.20261. Appeal under Section 96 of CPC has been filed on behalf of theAppellant against Judgment and Decree dated 15.12.2022, whereby Suit for Partition filed by the Plaintiffs / Appellants has been rejected on technical grounds of the property being described as Plot No.A-12, Shiv Vihar, Masjidwali Gali, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi, while the correct property Number was 50-E, Shiv Vihar, Masjidwali Gali, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi.2. The Record shows that Defendant has never raised any objection inthe Written Statement, in regard to the property number, that got mentioned. In fact, both parties led their evidence in respect of Property No.50-E, Shiv Vihar, Masjidwa...
Jai Prakash & Ors. vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of reserving Judgment: 04th February, 2026 Date of decision: 27th March, 2026IN THE MATTER OF:+ CRL.A. 124/2004 JAI PRAKASH & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Raj Kishor Garg and Mr. Sachin Dabas, Advs. with Appellants.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Suneel Kumar Sahu, PS South Rohini.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVJUDGMENTVIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J.1. The instant case is a burning example of citizens apathy, individualgreed, failure of governance, lack of control and supervision by thesuperior authorities, all rolled into this one case and can be seen if the factsare examined threadbare.2. The Police Control Room was informed about an altercation inSector-3, Pocket F-24, Rohini and when the PCR vehicle reached at the spot, PW-4 ASI Satbir Singh had found three injured persons namely Ram Dass, Jai Prakash and Pradeep, who all wer...
Porwal Tar Products Pvt Ltd vs Uoi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3833/2026 PORWAL TAR PRODUCTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Advocate.versusUOI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms Ekta Chaudhary, SPC with Mr Akash Gupta, GP for R1. Mr. B K.Sood with Mr. Nitish Ahuja, Advocates for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court.2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty as prayed for.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JMARCH 27, 2026arThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:40:25...
Gayatri Projects Limited vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 272/2026 & I.A. 8221/2026 GAYATRI PROJECTS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Angad Mehta and Mr. Arsh, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana, Mr. Lubna Naaz and Ms. Vanshika Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by one year.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 27, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR co...
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd vs Nakeem Uddin & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 524/2026 & I.A. 8227-28/2026 TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Simranjeet Kaur, Adv.versusNAKEEM UDDIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 27.03.20261. Ms. Simranjeet Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks towithdraw the present petition on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.VIKAS MAHAJAN, JMARCH 27, 2026/dssThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2026 at 15:54:09...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »