Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sita Ram vs State
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 695/2004 SITA RAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate with Appellant-in-person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP, CBI with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 30.03.20261. Hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions from the Appellantstated that the Appellant does not want to continue with the appeal as he has already completed the sentence awarded to him and for that matter, fine was paid.6. This fact stands verified from the Nominal Roll dated 20.03.2026.3. In such circumstances, the appeal has become infructuous and standsdisposed of.VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, JMARCH 30, 2026/akcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:18:34...
Parsvnath Developers Limited vs Mrs Arvinder Sethi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 656/2026, CM APPL. 19638/2026 & CM APPL. 19639/2026 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Joneja and Mr. Anmol Kumar, Advocates.versusMRS ARVINDER SETHI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave towithdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.3. Accordingly, in view of the submission made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/nd/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above...
Anju Kapur vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 168/2026 ANJU KAPUR .....AppellantThrough: Mr. Piyush Kalra, Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Saqib M and Ms. Aishwarya Jain, Advs.VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Harshit Chopra, SC, MCD with Ms. Swati Tiwari and Mr. Khushal Chand Agarwal, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 30.03.2026CM Nos.19624/2026 & 19625/20261. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of.LPA 168/20263. Heard learned counsel for the parties.4. This intra-Court appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 11.03.2026,passed by the learned Single Judge whereby W.P.(C) No. 3149/2026 which was instituted by the appellant has been dismissed on the ground that the show cause notice in respect of the subject construction was issued on 10.07.2024 and demolition order was passed on 05.09.2024, however, despite availa...
Dolly vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4029/2026 with CM APPL. 19680/2026 and CM APPL.DOLLY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra, Ms. Shivani Verma, Mr. Rajeev Dubey and Ms. Renu, Advocates.versusBSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITEDAND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates for R-1/BSES. Mr. Anirudh Dusaj, ASC for R-2/DERC.Mr. Shiven Varma, panel counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Rudraksh Mathur, Advocate for R-3 (through VC). Mr. M.S. Oberoi, standing counsel for MCD with Ms. Pransha, Advocate forR-5/MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to therespondent no.1/ BSES Yamuna Power Limited (BYPL) to grant electricity connection at the property bearing no. T-661/A-2 fourth floor, Right side with roof rights, Gali No. 21, Durga Mohalla, Baljeet Nagar Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008 (subject property).W.P.(C) 4029/2026 Pa...
Ashok Mahajan @ Hunny & Ors. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 998/2026, CRL.M.A. 9420/2026 ASHOK MAHAJAN @ HUNNY & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr.C.M.Grover Advocate for P-1 Ms.Kashish Dhawan and Ms.Payal Budhiraja, Advocate for P-2 & 3versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State Mr.C.S.Arora, Advocate for R-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9420/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 998/20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC], seeking quashing of FIR No. 423/2025 dated 02.11.2025, registered at Police Station Geeta Colony under Sections 85/316/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita [BNS], and all...
Brind Kesri @ Bind Kesari @ Raja Singh vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2305/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9417/2026 BRIND KESRI @ BIND KESARI @ RAJA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for the petitioner (appearance not given)versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI AmitCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 1325/2014 of PoliceStation S.P. Badli for offence under Section 336/506 IPC read with Section 24.03.2026 executed between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2.2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the petitioner is that he isinvolved in various cases and was even sent to jail for some time; and that on the date of the alleged incident, when he went to parental home of his wife (complainant de facto) to fetch her back, but she refused to return, he threatened to kill her; and that after few days, he again visited parental home of the complaina...
Indusind General Insurance Company Limited (Formerly Reliance General ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 30th March 2026+ MAC.APP. 218/2026 & CM APPL. 19693-19694/2026INDUSIND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(FORMERLY RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD).....Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advs.versusROSHAN KUMAR SAHU & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned award dated 16 thJanuary 2026 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal [MACT], Central, Tis Hazari Courts in MACT No.799/2024.2. The accident in question occurred on 20th August 2024 at about 3:30p.m. when respondent no.1/claimant was driving a motorcycle bearing registration no. DL-8SDF-1990. When he reached main Pusta Road, near Milan Vihar, Jagat Pur Mor, Sant Nagar, Burari, a Swift car bearing registration no. DL-lCAC-2049 (hereinafter, offending vehicle), driven in front of him, suddenly opened the car door ...
Raj Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1211/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9418/2026RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pushyamitra Vyas with Mr. D.K. Verma and Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with W/SI Manju, PS Sagarpur and W/SI Vinod Kapoor, FRRO.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.03.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 502/2024 dated23.08.2024, registered at Police Station Sagar Pur, for commission of offences under Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Section 376 IPC) and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.2. A perusal of the present matter would indicate that the applicant hereinhad lastly prayed for bail before the learned Court of Sessions in August, 2025 and his such application was dismissed on 30.08.2025. It is informed that victim and another material pu...
Union of India and Others vs Lt Col Ajay Kumar Retd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 4126/2026 CM APPL. 20137-20140/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Puja S. Kalra, CGSC Major Kanika Sharma, ArmyversusLT COL AJAY KUMAR RETD .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 20139-20140/2026 (exemption)1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of.W.P.(C) 4126/20263. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 15.10.2024 [impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 3998/2023 titled as Lt. Col Ajay Kumar (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors., wherein the Respondent has been granted the benefit of the disability element of pension for Primary Hype...
Goraya Straw Board Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Shri Ganesh Paper Trading Co.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CM(M) 663/2026GORAYA STRAW BOARD MILLS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi and Mr. Gurjas Narula, Advocates.versusSHRI GANESH PAPER TRADING CO. .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 19862/2026 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.CM(M) 663/2026 & CM APPL. 19861/2026 (for stay)3. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of theConstitution of India, assailing the impugned order dated 12th September, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in C.S. (COMM.) No. 489/2021, whereby the evidence of the petitioner/defendant has been closed.4. Heard. Record perused.5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the learned TrialCourt has passed the impugned order on the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »