Sita Ram vs State

Sita Ram vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1258974

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1258974
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL.A./695/2004
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sita Ram

Advocate Mr. Balram Singh, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Aryan Rakesh

Respondent

STATE

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 695/2004 sita ram .....appellant through: mr. balram singh, advocate with appellant-in-person.versusstate .....respondent through: mr. atul guleria, spp, cbi with mr. aryan rakesh, adv.coram:hon’ble mr. justice vimal kumar yadavorder% 30.03.20261. hybrid mode.2. learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from the appellantstated that the appellant does not want to continue with the appeal as he has already completed the sentence awarded to him and for that matter, fine was paid.6. this fact stands verified from the nominal roll dated 20.03.2026.3. in such circumstances, the appeal has become infructuous and standsdisposed of.vimal kumar yadav, jmarch 30, 2026/akcthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 02/04/2026 at 11:18:34

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 695/2004 SITA RAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate with Appellant-in-person.

versus

STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP, CBI with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Adv.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

ORDER

% 30.03.2026

1. Hybrid mode.

2. Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions from the Appellant

stated that the Appellant does not want to continue with the appeal as he has already completed the sentence awarded to him and for that matter, fine was paid.

6. This fact stands verified from the Nominal Roll dated 20.03.2026.

3. In such circumstances, the appeal has become infructuous and stands

disposed of.

VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J

MARCH 30, 2026/akc

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:18:34

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Sita Ram vs STATE Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav