Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Obinna Okolie vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1941/2025 OBINNA OKOLIE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Meghan, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 09, 2026/ns/APThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 12:43:48...
William John vs Ceo Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9647/2025 with CM APPL. 40483/2025 WILLIAM JOHN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Dhall, Ms. Rani Tiwari and Mr. Priyanshu, AdvocatesversusCEO BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates for BSES Mr. Hawan Pratap Singh, Advocate for R-3 along with R-3 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to therespondents/ BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (hereinafter BRPL) to restore the electricity connection, CA No. 150293668, in the premises bearing Plot No. R-153, 4th Floor, Left Side, Khirki Extension, New Delhi-110017 (hereinafter subject property).2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that thepetitioner is the lawful occupant of the subject property. However, the electricity meter was installed in the name of Mr. Praveen Kumar Saini, the or...
Mahesh Kumar & Ors. vs Govt. Ofnct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10980/2023 & CM APPL. 42546/2023 MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through:versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Services with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates. Ms. Tanu Priya, Advocate for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 09.03.20261. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated25.05.2023, in O.A. No. 3622/2019, whereby the learned Central Administrative Tribunal had dismissed the said original application after considering the entire aspects of the matter.2. In substance, the Petitioners pray for interchange of vacanciesreserved for visually handicapped candidates with orthopedically handicapped candidates, and thereby, to appoint the Petitioners to the post of Teacher (Primary).3. Respondent No.3/ MCD has filed an affidavit dated 07.03....
Soma Devi vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~4 & 5* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11658/2019 SOMA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2379/2021 & CM APPL. 6934/2021 RAJ KUMAR Sharma And Ors .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kripa Shankar Prasad, Ms. Rashmi Narina, Ms. Indra Bhushan Prasad and Mr. Harsh Jain, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY And Ors .....Respondents Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr. Chetan Sharma, Advocate for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 09.03.20261. The Petitioners were employees of the Export Inspection Council, a statutory organisation functioning under the Department of Commerce and Industry.2. The controversy in the present petitions concerns the Petitionersentitlement to switch over from the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme to the General Provident Fund (GPF) Pension Scheme. An identical issue had earlier arisen before this Court in W....
Mount St. Mary'S High School vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1139/2012 MOUNT ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. None appears for the parties despite the matter having been called out in second round.2. None had appeared for the parties on 05.01.2026, 13.01.2026, 23.01.2026, 16.02.2026 and 23.02.2026.3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:46:44...
Preeti Gupta vs Madan Mohan Pahwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 9th March, 2026 + RC.REV. 306/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusMADAN MOHAN PAHWA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Budhiraja, Adv. + RC.REV. 308/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusRAJ KUMAR BHATIA .....Respondent Through: None. + RC.REV. 310/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusSUDHARSHAN KUMARI PAHWA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shubham Budhiraja, Adv.Signed By:BHASKAR RC.REV. 306/2023 & conn. Page 1 of 17 + RC.REV. 311/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusGOVIND RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR .....Respondent Through: None. + R...
Rajesh Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax & Anr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~13 & 14* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3689/2008 VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD. .....Petitioner COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICE TAX, DELHI EAST & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 7626/2009 RAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 09.03.20261. On 7th February, 2026, none appeared for the petitioners, as such, the matter was listed today for dismissal.2. Even today, none appeared for the petitioners.3. That being so, the writ petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MARCH 9, 2026/pr/sk...
Bashi Kaur @ Avinash Kaur vs Surender Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 999/2019 & CM APPL. 6175/2021 BASHI KAUR @ AVINASH KAUR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSURENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Honey Taneja, Advocate along with respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, seeks the following prayers: a) pass appropriate orders against the contemnor/ respondent for, violating order dated 24.02.2015 passed in Crl. M.C. No. him for making willfully perjured statement before court of law, b) award the cost of litigation in favour of petitioner and against the contemnor, in the interest of justice.3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.4. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last dates of hearing, i.e., 17.03.2025, 12.08.2025 and 28.10.2025 as well.5. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions...
Vijender Gupta vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2964/2021 & CRL.M.A. 18650/2021 VIJENDER GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pavan Narang, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, Mr. Neeraj, Mr. Kautilya Birat and Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Abhishek Shandilya and Mr. Vedansoh Vashisth, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking the followingreliefs: a. quash the Summoning Order dated 11.10.2021 passed by Sh. Ravindra Kumar Pandey, Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rouse A venue District Court Complex in Complaint case no.-15/2021 registered u/s 499, 500 and 501 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the Petitioner and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom; and/or, b. hold that the criminal complaint case no.-15/2021 registered u...
M/S. Sunrise Sales Corporation vs M/S. Rama Krishana Electro Component ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 485/2019 M/S. SUNRISE SALES CORPORATION .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Harjas Pratap, Mr Sandeep Kumar, Ms. Diksha, Mr. Girish Chandra Mishra (Party/Plaintiff in person)versusM/S. RAMA KRISHANA ELECTRO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kamal Garg, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 09.03.2026 I.A. 5521/20261. This Application has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking withdrawal of the present Suit.2. The present Suit was filed on 20.08.2019 seeking recovery of Rs.18,04,34,960/- from the Defendants.3. The Plaintiff is present in Court today. He has been identified by the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff.4. It is stated by the Plaintiff that he has no intentions to pursue the present Suit and he, therefore, seeks to withdraw the same.5. Application is allowed.6. The present Suit is dismissed as withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) of the CPC.7. The dates already fix...
- ‹ Prev
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 372
- 373
- 375
- 376
- 377
- 378
- 379
- Next ›
- Last »