Bashi Kaur @ Avinash Kaur vs Surender Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 09, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1268779

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1268779
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma
Decided On: Mar 09, 2026
Case Number: CONT.CAS(C)/999/2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bashi Kaur @ Avinash Kaur

Respondent

Surender Singh

Advocate Mr. Honey Taneja

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cont.cas(c) 999/2019 & cm appl. 6175/2021 bashi kaur @ avinash kaur .....petitioner through: none.versussurender singh .....respondent through: mr. honey taneja, advocate along with respondent in person.coram:hon'ble mr. justice amit sharmaorder% 09.03.20261. this hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. the present petition under section 10, 11 and 12 of the contempt ofcourts act, seeks the following prayers: “a) pass appropriate orders against the contemnor/ respondent for, violating order dated 24.02.2015 passed in crl. m.c. no. him for making willfully perjured statement before court of law, b) award the cost of litigation in favour of petitioner and against the contemnor, in the interest of justice.”3. none appears on behalf of the petitioner.4. none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last dates of hearing, i.e., 17.03.2025, 12.08.2025 and 28.10.2025 as well.5. learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, submits that all the arrears have been cleared.6. in view of the above, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.7. pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. amit sharma, j march 09, 2026/bsr/sg

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CONT.CAS(C) 999/2019 & CM APPL. 6175/2021 BASHI KAUR @ AVINASH KAUR .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
SURENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Honey Taneja, Advocate along with respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

ORDER

% 09.03.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition under Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of

Courts Act, seeks the following prayers: “a) pass appropriate orders against the contemnor/ respondent for, violating order dated 24.02.2015 passed in Crl. M.C. No. him for making willfully perjured statement before court of law, b) award the cost of litigation in favour of petitioner and against the contemnor, in the interest of justice.”

3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

4. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last dates of hearing, i.e., 17.03.2025, 12.08.2025 and 28.10.2025 as well.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, submits that all the arrears have been cleared.

6. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.

7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J MARCH 09, 2026/bsr/sg

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Bashi Kaur @ Avinash Kaur vs Surender Singh Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma