Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dheeraj Bakshi and Anr vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1663/2026 DHEERAJ BAKSHI AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Bansal, Advocate along with petitioners-in-personversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 Mr. Ankit Sharma, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person SI Raj Pal, PS Rani BaghCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 318/2016 datedarising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 29.01.2012, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Parties were blessed with a baby girl on 12.08.2013.3. However, due to certain temperamental differences, the parties couldnot live together and started living separately.4. On account of such matrimonial discord, a complaint was lodged...
Pritam Singh Rathore vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2888/2026 PRITAM SINGH RATHORE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Aditya (8699723746), Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Kailash Kr. Jha, Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra, Mr. Akhil Rexwal, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, SC for MCD with Ms. Ann Joseph, Adv. Ms. Disha Choudhary, GP(UOI), along with SI Raghu Raj (P.S. Sangam Vihar) Ms Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) for GNCTDCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-Pritam SinghRathore under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend at her designated spot i.e., on the Footpath/Open Space, Ratiya Marg, Near MB Road, C...
Akanksha Jain vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2914/2026 & CM APPL. 14090/2026 AKANKSHA JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa and Ms. Kanishka Chandnani, Advocates.versusKENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Mr. R. Gowrishankar and Ms. G. Dhivyasri, Advocates for all Respondents.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 09.03.20261. This writ petition seeks the following relief:a) Issue a writ of certiorari thereby declaring impugned orders dated 13.03.2025, 28.06.2025, 23.08.2025 and 01.09.2025 as 35 arbitrary and illegal and further direct the Respondents to sanction Child Care Leave in continuation of maternity leave in accordance with Rule 43(4)(b) of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, and withdraw any punitive notices or office orders treating the Petitioner's leave as unauthorized; b) Issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other writ, order or direction of the similar nature direc...
Balpreet Singh & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1679/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6805/2026 & CRL.M.A. BALPREET SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP Mr. K.K.Sharma & Mr. Tushar Batra, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yogendra Kumar, SI, PS-Moti Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 102/2023, dated 11.04.2023, forcommission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34/354/323 IPC 1860, registered at P.S. Moti Nagar, Delhi.2. The charge-sheet has already been filed and petitioner no. 1 has alreadyput his appearance.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Courts in Delhi donot have territorial jurisdiction to try the alleged offences, as respondent no. 2 is a permanent resident of Ghaziabad and never ever resided in Delhi.4. After hearing arguments for some time, learned Counsel for thepetitioners, without p...
Ajit Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi Through Sho Bawana
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 888/2026, CRL.M.A. 6803/2026 AJIT KUMAR .....Applicant Through: Mr Rajneesh Solanki, Mr. Kartik Gupta and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO BAWANA.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. SI- Naveen Sharma, PS: BawanaCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail/ interim bail in FIR No.36/2026 registered under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) at PS: Bawana, Delhi.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application.3. The present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, isdismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE...
Shri Bhupinder Singh Sahota on His Own Behalf and as Spa Holder for Ot ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2899/2026 & CM APPL. 14047/2026, CM APPL.SHRI BHUPINDER SINGH SAHOTA ON HIS OWN BEHALFAND AS SPA HOLDER FOR OTHER PETITIONERS.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shashi Bala, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kritika Gupta, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- i. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction permitting the Petitioners to withdraw from the impugned e- Auction allotments and directing the Respondent to refund/return the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and any other deposited amounts, without forfeiture or penal consequences, on account of material misrepresentation and absence of statutory possession-readiness. ii. Pending final disposal of the present petition, restrain the Respondent from cancelling the allotments and/or fo...
Sameer @ Nawab vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 891/2026, CRL.M.A. 6811/2026, CRL.M.A. 6812/2026SAMEER @ NAWAB .....Applicant Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, Adv.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. SI- K. Singh Rawat, Anti Narcotic CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.444/2024 registered under Sections 21/25/29 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) at PS: Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application.3. The present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, isdismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMARCH 9...
Studio Dra International Designers Pvt Ltd vs Airports Authority of In ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 105/2026, CM APPL. 14071/2026 & CM APPL. 14072/2026STUDIO DRA INTERNATIONAL DESIGNERSPVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Mr. Zain A. Khan, Mr. Dev Aaryan & Mr. Mohd. Abran Khan, Advocates.versusAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai- Standing Counsel with Mr. Archit Mishra, Advocate and Mr. Gagan Kochar- Sr. Manager(Law) & Mr. Shashank Gupta- JE(Law) for Respondent No.1/AAI.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 09.03.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. After arguing at some length, the learned Counsel for the Appellantstates that the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the instant Appeal with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court for redressal of its grievances.3. The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with the liberty as prayed for.Pending Applications also stand disposed ...
Sh Lalit Kumar Proprietor of M S World Wide Impex vs Indusind Bank Thr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 363/2026 SH LALIT KUMAR PROPRIETOR OF M S WORLD WIDE IMPEX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Adv. (through v/c)versusINDUSIND BANK THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELYMR.SUNIL MEHTA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Rathore and Mr. Umang Saini, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 09.03.2026 CM APPL.14054/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CM APPL.14055/2026 (seeking condonation of delay)3. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 10 days in re-filing the present petition.4. Considering the averments made in the application, the same isallowed and the delay of 10 days stands condoned.5. The application is disposed of.CONT.CAS(C) 363/20266. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of directionscontained in the order dated 22.12.2025, passed in W.P.(C) 2456/2024. The operative dir...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Brhamkaur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 161/2026, CM APPL. 14153/2026 CM APPL. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate with Mr. Sahil Paul, Advocates.versusBRHAMKAUR & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 09.03.20261. This appeal has been filed challenging the impugned awarddated 3rd December 2025 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Rohini Courts [MACT], in MAC Petition No. 84/2021, whereby an award was passed in favour of claimant for a sum of Rs. 62,21,000/- along with 7.5% interest per annum.2. Counsel for appellant/Insurance Company challenges the awardon the basis that the claimants could not prove negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle, and the MACT erred in accepting the record of the criminal proceedings for the purpose of determining Issue No. 1. For ease of reference, said Issue is extracted as under: Whether deceased Tejvir Singh has die...
- ‹ Prev
- 361
- 362
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 371
- Next ›
- Last »