Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Directorate of Enforcement vs Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~60 to 64* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 657/2022, CRL.M.As. 2840/2022, 19865/2022 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Vashisht Rao, Ms. Amisha P Dash, Ms. Riya Sachdev and Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Advocates. RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankush Goyal and Mr. Kartikay Kumar, Advocates.CRL.M.C. 1477/2022, CRL.M.A. 6411/2022ASSISTANT DIRECTOR .....PetitionerSHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate.W.P.(CRL) 96/2022, CRL.M.A. 1054/2022RP GOYAL .....PetitionerMr. Himanshu Gupta and Mr. Rohan, Advocates for Applicant/BPSL.CRL.M.C. 1702/2023, CRL.M.A. 6507/2023CRL.M.C. 499/2023, CRL.M.A. 1967/2023CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. A common question which entails in the present batch of matters iswhether the accused is entitled to be supplied with the unrelied documents.2. In this backdrop, this Court passed the following o...
Apl Logistics (India) Private Limited vs Jpfl Films Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 174/2026 APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jhun Jhun Sarkar & Mr. Nishant Menon, Advs.versusJPFL FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through:CORAM:DR. JAGMINDER SINGH (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)ORDER% 23.03.20261. Matter is listed for deciding as to whether the plaintiff is entitled torefund of court fee or not.2. As consider this issue of ld. counsel for plaintiff and perused therecord.3. It is clear in the order dated 09.03.2026 that the present suit has beenwithdrawn by the plaintiff and under Order VII Rule 10 with liberty to file the fresh suit before the Court of competent jurisdiction as the suit has been filed before this Court without proper territorial jurisdiction.4. In view of law laid down by the Division Bench of this Honble Courtin FAO(COMM) 27/2023 Amit Jain vs. Mahavir International Pvt. Ltd. & Ors, 2023: DHC:3090-DB, the plaintiff is e...
Renu Devi vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~(mentioning)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 608/2026 SMT. RENU DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Madesiya, Advocates.versusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl) with Ms. Priyam Agrawal, Advocate with SI Mohit Kumar and SI Lal Chand, PS- S.B.Dairy.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHONBLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINORDER% 09.03.2026W.P.(CRL) 608/20261. This petition has been taken up for hearing on being mentionedby Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, the learned counsel for the respondents. She submits that the minor girl has since been recovered and is presently staying with the petitioner.2. A Status Report dated 09.03.2026 has also been handed over byher. The same is taken on record.3. We have interacted with the minor girl, and she wishes to residewith her mother, who is also present in person before us.4. In view of the above, the custody of the minor girl is handedover to ...
Ghunna Ram vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 18 December 2025 Pronounced on: 9 March 2026+ W.P.(C) 3427/2023 & CM APPL. 13237/2023 GHUNNA RAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash K Sharma, Mr. Ankur Vyas and Mr. R Abhishek and Ms. Garima Joshi, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Manish Kumar Singh, Vasu Agarwal, Lekh Raj Singh, Advocates for UPSC Mr. Ankit Siwach, Adv. with Mr. Naginder Benipal, SPC with UOI Major Anish Muralidhar Army Insp Athurv and Mr. Ramniwas Yadav,CRPFCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA% JUDGMENT09.03.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.A. FactsI. Uncontested factsW.P.(C) 3427/2023 Page 1 of 251. The petitioner joined the Indian Army1 as Sepoy on 28 August2004. He was promoted as Havildar Major (Technical) on 27September 2015. At the time of his promotion, he had executed a five year bond with the Army, which...
MD Jabiullah vs Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 871/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6733/2026 MD JABIULLAH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam Sharma, AdvocateversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Pratiksha, PS Prem NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 09.03.20261. The applicant/accused seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 352/2024 ofPolice Station Prem Nagar for offence under Section 363/376 IPC & Section 6 of POCSO Act.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, oninstructions, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with the request for direction to the IO to investigate the truthfulness of the statement of the prosecutrix that the accused/applicant got performed nikah with her over telephone through a maulvi. Learned APP for State submits that they shall investigate role of the maulvi who performed the nikah over telephone between the accused/applicant an...
Indu Bala Pahuja vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1654/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6739/2026 INDU BALA PAHUJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Manchanda, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Sunder Singh. Mr. Gopal Yadav, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 09.03.20261. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 144/2017 of Police StationKirti Nagar (West Delhi) for offence under Section 420/468/471 IPC on the ground that the respondent no.2 (complainant de facto) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructionsof his client present in court seeks permission to withdraw this petition on being pointed out that it is the office of Joint Commissioner of Police which was defrauded for obtaining a license on the basis of forged documents.3. A...
Yogita & Ors. vs Pritam Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 61/2026 & CM APPL. 12962-63/2026 YOGITA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Mr. Rajnish, Ms. Shivani Chhikara & Ms. Kimaya Tomer, Advs.versusPRITAM SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Mr. Saksham Gupta, Mr. Piyush Gupta & Ms. Himanshi Soni, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, seeks the following prayers:-
Deepak Kumar@Kallu vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 874/2026, CRL.M.A. 6743/2026, CRL.M.A. 6744/2026DEEPAK KUMAR@KALLU .....Applicant Through: Mohd. Atif and Mr. Vaibhav Saini, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State Insp. Satbir Singh, PS: Hauz QaziCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Sections 483 and 528of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of interim bail in FIR No.142/2022 registered under Sections 308/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at PS: Hauz Khas.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application.3. The present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, isdismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMARCH 9, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-v...
Rahul Sood vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 716/2026 RAHUL SOOD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 09.03.20261. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 647/2025 of Police StationKalkaji, South-East District, Delhi for offence under Section 420 IPC & Section 24 of Emigration Act on the basis of settlement dated 12.01.2026 between the parties.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioner on instructionsseeks permission to withdraw this petition.3. As requested, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JMARCH 9, 2026/ryThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2026 at 11:02:22...
Satbir Negi Alias Satveer Singh & Ors. vs the Sate Govt of Nct of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1674/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6791/2026 SATBIR NEGI ALIAS SATVEER SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mani Mishra, Advocate aloing with petitioners-in-personversusTHE SATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Sunita Respondent no. 2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Present petition has been received on transfer.2. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.244/2019, registered atpolice station Pul Prahlad Pur for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/323/506/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.3. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 11.11.2016, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies.4. However, due to certain temp...
- ‹ Prev
- 360
- 361
- 362
- 363
- 364
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- Next ›
- Last »