Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Janki & Anr vs Tarif Mohd & Ors (the New Inda Assurance Co Ltd )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 14th January 2026 Pronounced on: 10th March 2026 Uploaded on : 11th March 2026. + MAC.APP. 709/2018 JANKI & ANR ..Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advocates.versusTARIF MOHD & ORS (THE NEW INDA ASSURANCE CO LTD ) ..Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh and Ms. Raveesha Gupta, Advocates for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 173 Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (MV Act) by claimants (parents of the deceased) assailing thejudgment dated 02nd April 2018 passed by the Motor Accidents ClaimsTribunal in MACT No.14749/2015 dismissing the claim petition. The Incident2. On 16th May 2014, Ish Narayan @ Nar Singh Narayan along withhis cousin brother Vijay Kumar was coming to Delhi from Hodal, Palwal, Haryana by Maruti Van bearing no. HR-10D-6922, driven allegedly at normal speed and on correct side of the road. Digitally Signed MAC.AP...
Air Express Travel & Tour & Ors vs Thai Airways International Public C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 566/2011 AIR EXPRESS TRAVEL & TOUR & ORS .....Appellants Through: None.versusTHAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC CO LTD & ANR .....Respondents Through: Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Nina Gupta & Ms. Vishali S., Advs. for R-1. Mr. Naman Saraswat, Adv. for R- 2/IATA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 10.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC seeks the followingprayers:- i. allow the appeal and set aside the judgement and decree dated 28.9.2011 passed by Ms. Savita Rao, Addl. District Judge, Delhi and dismiss the suit filed by the respondent no.1 herein. ii. Cost of the appeal throughout be also allowed in favour of the appellant and against the respondent iii. Such other order or further orders be passed as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.3. None appears on behalf of the appellants despite...
Vikram Sharma vs Monika
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 638/2018 & CRL.M.A. 28901/2018 VIKRAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Baldev Raj and Ms. Shikha Tyagi, Advocates.versusMONIKA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Davinder Hora and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 10.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 397 read withSection 401 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 27.04.2018 (impugned order) passed by the learned ASJ-02, West District, Tis Harari Courts, Delhi (ASJ) in Criminal Appeal No.68/2018 entitled Monika vs. Vikram Sharma, whereby the learned ASJ has directed the petitioner to pay Rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent as interim maintenance.2. After some arguments, learned counsels for the parties withoutadverting to the merits involved, submit that the parties are agreeable if the interim maintenance as fixed by the learned ...
Inderjeet Singh Sidhu vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 9th January, 2026. Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 10th March, 2026. + W.P.(C) 7913/2018 INDERJEET SINGH SIDHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. SN Kaul and Mr. Vinod Z., Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anju Gupta & Mr. Bhuvan Goel, Advs for UOI. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Mr. Abhinav Pandey and Mr. Shrimay Mishra, Advs. for R-2 to 4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAJUDGMENTSANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. This petition questions the legality of the Unsatisfactory gradingrecorded in the Petitioners Annual Confidential Report1 for the year 2015- 2016, and the decision communicated on 11th August, 2017 rejecting his representation. The challenge is to the fairness and legality of the process by which an adverse assessment was recorded, endorsed, and then defended by the very authority whose endorsement was under challenge.Facts2. The Petitioner joined EdCIL (India) Limited in August, 2008 ...
Madhuri Commodities Private Ltd & Ors vs M/S Sony India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 10th December, 2025 Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026 + W.P. (CRL) 2840/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16415/20171. MADHURI COMMODITIES PRIVATE LTD. Through its Director, Having its Registered Office at: 16-B, Dover Lane, Kolkata, West Bengal - 7000292. MR. PRAVEEN KUMAR AGARWAL Managing Director 16-B, Dover Lane, Kolkata, West Bengal - 7000293. MR. RAJ KUMAR AGARWAL Director, 16-B, Dover Lane, Kolkata, West Bengal - 700029 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Awanish Kumar and Ms Garima, Advocates.Versus1. M/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. Through its authorized representative Mr. Gurmeet Singh A-31, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate Mathura Road, New Delhi - 110044 .....Respondent No. 12. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through SHO Parliament Street Police Station Sansad Marg Connaught Place, near Patel Chowk,Signed By:VIKAS W.P. (CRL) 2840/2017 Page 1 of 20 New Delhi, Delhi...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Geeta Tripathi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
$~9 & 10* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 10th March 2026 (9) + MAC.APP. 453/2015 & CM APPL. 9931/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Ridhima Gaur & Ms. Ring Baliyan, Advs. for Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. for Insurance Co.versusGEETA TRIPATHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Aastha Chauhan and Ms. Anjali Singh, Advs. for R-1 to 5. (10) + MAC.APP. 14/2016 GEETA TRIPATHI & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Aastha Chauhan and Ms. Anjali Singh, Advs.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ridhima Gaur & Ms. Ring Baliyan, Advs. for Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. for Insurance Co.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. These cross-appeals have been filed respectively by the Insurance Company and the claimant, assailing the impugned award dated 22nd April Digitally Signed MAC.APP. 453/2015 & MAC.APP. 14/2016 Page 1 of 11...
Sh. Mukul Agarwal vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 6th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 10th March, 2026. + W.P.(C) 12069/2018 SH. NAVEEN KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Onkar Nath and Mr. Anuj Mirdha, Advocates.versusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. A. K. Roy, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 12110/2018 SH. MUKUL AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Onkar Nath and Mr. Anuj Mirdha, Advocates.versusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. A. K. Roy, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAJUDGMENTSANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The Petitioners were long-serving executives of Bharat Heavy By:NITIN KAIN W.P.(C) 12069/2018 & W.P.(C) 12110/2018 Page 1 of 29Electricals Limited1, a Central Public Sector Enterprise. Both left BHEL after being selected to a post in another Government of India undertaking. Their applications were routed through proper channel....
Subhash C Sahni vs State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 18th December, 2025 Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 2473/2017 & CRL.M.A. 14213/2017 SUBHASH C. SAHNI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Mr. Sridhar Kale, Mr. Rahul Tyagi and Mr. Rohit Gupta, AdvocatesversusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates for the State Mr. Yashvir Sethi, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Mr. Varun Maheshwari, Mr. Manan Soni and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates for R-2 + W.P.(CRL) 2479/2017 & CRL.M.A. 14242/2017 SUBHASH C. SAHNI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Mr. Sridhar Kale, Mr. Rahul Tyagi and Mr. Rohit Gupta, AdvocatesversusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates for the State Digitally Signed By:ANIL W.P.(CRL) 2473/2017 & W.P.(CRL) 247...
Sh. Naveen Kumar Gupta vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 6th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 10th March, 2026. + W.P.(C) 12069/2018 SH. NAVEEN KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Onkar Nath and Mr. Anuj Mirdha, Advocates.versusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. A. K. Roy, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 12110/2018 SH. MUKUL AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Onkar Nath and Mr. Anuj Mirdha, Advocates.versusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. A. K. Roy, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAJUDGMENTSANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The Petitioners were long-serving executives of Bharat Heavy By:NITIN KAIN W.P.(C) 12069/2018 & W.P.(C) 12110/2018 Page 1 of 29Electricals Limited1, a Central Public Sector Enterprise. Both left BHEL after being selected to a post in another Government of India undertaking. Their applications were routed through proper channel....
Radha M Nair vs Axis Bank Ltd. and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 689/2024 & CM APPL. 3065/2024, CM APPL. 37568/2025 RADHA M NAIR .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusAXIS BANK LTD. AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Adv Sanjay Kumar R1CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 09.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- a. Issue a writ/ order/ direction in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ/ order/ direction of like nature for directing the Respondent No. 1 Bank to consider the proposal/request made by the petitioner for settlement of account as per Guidelines issued by Respondent No. 2 with simple interest and by removing exorbitant rate of interest, cost, charges and penalties imposed in the account. b. Issue a writ, order or direction prohibiting the Respondents and / or their servants, agents, assignees and officers and / or any one cl...
- ‹ Prev
- 355
- 356
- 357
- 358
- 359
- 361
- 362
- 363
- 364
- 365
- Next ›
- Last »