Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul Singh & Ors. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3264/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14381/2025 RAHUL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prabhash Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Pradeep Kumar, PS Cyber NW Delhi Mr. Mohit Yadav and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates for R-2 with R- 2 through VCCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 28.03.2026 This petition was scheduled to be listed on 02.03.2026 but has been listed today, as 02.03.2026 was declared a holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 46/2022 dated 12.08.2022, registered at Cyber Police Station, North-West, under Sections 419, 420, 120B, 201, and 34 ...
Bombay Metals Pvt Ltd vs Tara Singh and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28.03.2026 + C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 770/2022 BOMBAY METALS PVT LTD .....PetitionerversusTARA SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Sachin Gupta, Ms. Prashansa Singh, Ms. Mahima Chanchalani, Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Ms. Diksha Tekriwal & Mr. Ajay, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Nishi Ranjan Singh, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1A and 1B.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. This is a Petition filed under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act) seeking removal / rectification of Copyright Registration No. A- FACTUAL BACKGROUND:2. The Petitioner, Bombay Metal Works (P) Ltd., is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing bicycle parts. The PetitionerC.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 770/2022 Page 1 of 11 claims that the said parts are marketed under a Trade Mark comprising a Trade Dress / Packaging, which has a distinctive colour co...
Kuldeep vs Sandeep Sharma
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 971/2025 KULDEEP .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSANDEEP SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, (through VC), Ms. Shefali and Mr. Anil Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M. At 02:55 P.M.4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the main suit has already been dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 24th March, 2026.5. At this stage, it is already 02:55 P.M., no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being called twice.6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pendi...
Ms Roshan @ Roshi Khan vs Sh Rajan Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 892/2022 MS ROSHAN @ ROSHI KHAN .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSH RAJAN SINGH &ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 28, 2026/v At 02:50 P.M.4. At this stage, it is already 02:50 P.M., no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being called twice.5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 28, 2026/v/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Cou...
Union of India and Ors. vs Naresh Chand Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~14 & 15(of 02.03.2026)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11120/2023 & CM APPL. 43173/2023 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. T. P. Singh, SPC NARESH CHAND SHARMA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Respondent Nos.- 1 to 7, 10,11, 16,17 & 18 in person + W.P.(C) 12830/2023 & CM APPL. 50516/2023 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhagwan Sawrup Shukla CGSC with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Pandey & Mr. Dashmesh Tripathi, Advs. VISWANATH SINGH AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Respondents in person Mr. Tushar Mittal & Ms. Garima Jindal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 28.03.20261. These matters have been listed today on account of declaration of holiday on 02.03.2026 by notification No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. An identical Petition, being W.P.(C) No.7757/2016, was dismissed on 25.03.2026 by the following order: 1. Through the present petiti...
State vs Munna Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.L.P. 571/2019 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. SI Ramakant, P.S. Sadar Bazar.versusMUNNA KUMAR .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 28.03.2026 The present matter is listed today i.e. 28.03.2026, since 02.03.2026 was declared a holiday. The State has filed the present petition on 17.10.2019 against acquittal. Notice on the present leave petition was issued on 18.10.2019. Thereafter, despite 12 dates having been passed, the State has taken no steps to serve the respondent. Yet again, vide order dated 06.11.2025, another opportunity was granted to the State to serve the respondent as well as his surety on filing of process fee and taking requisite steps for 02.03.2026. Office Report dated 27.03.2026 indicates that no steps were taken for service of the respondent. In view of the unexplained and inordinate failure on the part of the State to serve the responde...
Neena Kapoor vs the Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9604/2025, CM APPL. 40369/2025 and CM APPL. NEENA KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Dutta, Advocate.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate. Mr. Sidhartha Das, Mr. Himanshu Goel, Mr. Tushar Sharma and Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.03.2026 This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.1. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing Respondent No. I to forthwith issue a corrected/ amended Surviving Member Certificate bearing No. 90660000204822 dated 19.09.2023 or a fresh Surviving Member Certificate, duly incorporating the name of the Petitioner, Neena Kapoor, as a Surviving Member /legal heir of Late Shri Yashpal...
Rajiv Gupta vs Manager Sumitra D S Motors & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~19 & 20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1428/2023, CM APPL. 45646/2023 & CM APPL. 45649/2023 MANAGER SUMITRA D S MOTORS & ANR. .....Respondents Qinam, Advocates for R-2. 20. + CM(M) 1429/2023, CM APPL. 45713/2023 & CM APPL. 45716/2023 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Qinam, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the present petitions and prays that the petitions may be disposed of as withdrawn.4. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEE...
Ajay Sejwal @ Soni vs the State of Nct of Delhi Through Its Station Ho ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2669/2024 AJAY SEJWAL @ SONI .....Petitioner + BAIL APPLN. 2795/2024 SIKANDER .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 28.03.2026 Matters taken up today being 02.03.2026 declared holiday.1. The accused/applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.1.1 These bail application came up for the first hearing on 31.07.2024 and 08.08.2024 respectively before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, these applications also were transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. Learned APP for State has played the video clip of the suicide note recorded by the deceased immediately before committing suicide.3. After watching the clip, learned counsel for accused/applicants, on instructions, seek permission to withdraw these anticipatory bail applications.4. As requested, bot...
Sanjay vs State Govt of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2055/2025 SANJAY .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSTATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with Inspector Rajesh Vijay and SI Amit Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advocate for wife of deceasedCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 28.03.2026 Matter taken up today being 02.03.2026 declared holiday.1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 398/2010 ofPolice Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi for offence under Section 1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 28.05.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that healong with his associates killed the deceased and took aw...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »