Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 30 2026

Karnail Singh & Ors. vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

$~32 to 37, 39, 47, 48, 50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4001/2026 & CM APPL. 19603/2026 MAHENDER KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4002/2026 & CM APPL. 19604/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4003/2026 & CM APPL. 19606/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4014/2026 & CM APPL. 19648/2026 PREM KAUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4018/2026 & CM APPL. 19653/2026 JEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4028/2026 & CM APPL. 19679/2026 AMARJEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4036/2026 & CM APPL. 19689/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersW.P.(C) 4001/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 + W.P.(C) 4085/2026 & CM APPL. 20018/2026 GURBAKSH SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4086/2026 & CM APPL. 20019/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4121/2026 & CM APPL. 20130/2026 GURNAM SINGH &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Jeet Kaur & Ors. vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Gurnam Singh & Ors. vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Karnail Singh & Ors. vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Magma General Insurance Ltd vs Inder Wati & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 221/2026 & CM APPL. 20119-20121/2026 MAGMA GENERAL INSURANCE LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ved Vyas Tripathi, Adv.versusINDER WATI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 30.03.20261. This appeal filed by the Insurance Company assailing the award dated02nd September 2025 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Central, Tis Hazari Courts Delhi, [MACT] in MACT No.379/2022, whereby compensation of Rs.33,46,998/- along with 9% interest per annum was awarded in favour of respondent nos.1 to 5 [claimants], who are legal heirs of deceased.2. Claim Petition filed by claimants pertains to an accident whichoccurred on 11th December 2021 about 08.45 p.m., when Sh. Kuwar Pal Singh [deceased] was coming from Azadpur and going towards Rish Apartment, near Tirath Ram Memorial Hospital Civil Lines, Delhi to pick his scooter, when he was hit from behind by a Scooty bearing registration n...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Karnail Singh & Ors. vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Paramjeet Singh vs Bses Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 18.03.2026Pronounced on : 30.03.2026Uploaded on : 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 7184/2018 PARAMJEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Luthra and Mr. Shiven Asthana, Advocates.versusBSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocate, for Respondent No. 1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The workman has preferred the present writ petition seeking to impugn the award dated 28.03.2018 passed by the Labour Court, whereby his claim application came to be dismissed.2. In the claim application, the workman claimed that he had workedwith the Management on the post of Driver with effect from 14.12.2003 to 31.05.2012. The workman, along with the claim application, filed copies of two identity cards issued by respondent no. 2 herein (Management 2) and also a copy of the vehicular log dated 18.12.2003. His last drawn wages were Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Amar Mishra vs Dina Nath

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 445/2009 AMAR MISHRA .....Appellant Through: NoneversusDINA NATH .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:- a) the impugned judgment and decree dated 30.10.2009 passed bythe Ld, ADJ, Delhi in Suit No. 701/08/03 titled as Dina Nath versusAmar Mishra may kindly be set aside/ quashed and the aforesaid suit filed by the respondent may kindly be dismissed in the interest of justice . b) Cost of the appeal may also be awarded. Or such other order (s) be passed or reliefs be granted as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case.3. None appears on behalf of the appellant today.4. Vide order dated 02.12.2009, learned Predecessor Bench of this Court had passed the following order:-On appellant depositing entire de...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Vikram @ Baingan vs State

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1444/2014 VIKRAM @ BAINGAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. (DHCLSC) (through V.C.). Appellant-in-person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for State with SI Ritika Dhiwan, PS Chanakya Puri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 30.03.20261. Hybrid mode.2. It is informed by learned APP that the Appellant has completed his sentence awarded to him and also paid the fine.3. Therefore, in these circumstances, the Appellant, who is present in person states that he does not want to pursue the appeal anymore.4. Nominal Roll on record dated 15.12.2025, confirms the fact of completion of sentence and payment of fine.5. In view of these facts and circumstances and the stand taken by the Appellant, the appeal has become infructuous and stands disposed of. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MARCH 30, 2026/akcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

J.K. Mittal vs Bar Council of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

$~R-1 & 2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6136/2015 & CM 11156/2015 J.K. MITTAL .....Petitioner BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondent R-2 + W.P.(C) 6251/2015 & CM 11374/2015 J.K. MITTAL .....Petitioner BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ANR .....RespondentsCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. The remarks against the petitioner in the order dated 11.05.2015 passed by the Central Information Commission stand expunged for the reasons that the same are unnecessary for the adjudication of the dispute in question.2. Nothing more is required to be adjudicated in these petitions, accordingly, the same are disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 30, 2026 aks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.