Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vishnu Tiwari vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 463/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3500/2026 VISHNU TIWARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonali Tiwary, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No. 207/2024 dated 28.03.2024, registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, District East, New Delhi, under Sections 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Sections 4/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. In the course of arguments, I am informed that the father of the victim has been examined by the learned Sessions Court, but the mother has been partially examined. Ms. Sonali Tiwary, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the mother has not been available for cross examination on several occasions. 3. The proceedings are next listed before the learned Sessions Court on 16.03.2026 f...
Shri Dharmadev Puhan vs Pharmacy Council of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1403/2026 SHRI DHARMADEV PUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushant Mahapatra, Ms. Shivangi Banerjee and Ms. Shubhangi Jain, Advs versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Mr. Yatharth Singh, Mr. Divyansh Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- 1. direct the Respondent No.1 (PCI) to issue an elaborate, noncryptic and speaking order clarifying that Regulation 26 of the M. Pharma Course Regulations, 2014 as per their stand taken earlier in response to Respondent No.2's communications is the relevant regulation applicable in the present matter to allow re-admission of the Petitioner; 2. issue direction to Respondent No.2 that once such a clear indication is received from the Respondent No.1, the University ...
Saud Alam & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 582/2026 SAUD ALAM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State. R-2 through VC with her counsel Mr. Ali Choudhary and Md. Shahil Akhter, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 2325/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 582/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2326/2026 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR bearing no. 227/2023, registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 34/406/498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). 4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 (through video conferencing) are present and have been identified by their counsels and concer...
Mr. Naeem Ahmad vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 423/2025MR. NAEEM AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hasibuddin and Mr. Ayush Singh, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State Ms. Gracey Sachdeva, Advocate for complainantCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 262/2022 registeredat Police Station Jamia Nagar for commission of offences under Section2. On the last date when the matter was taken up, it was apprised thatearlier interim protection had been granted to the applicant and that matter has also been amicably settled between the parties.3. Learned counsel for complainant also appears along with complainantMehruddin Ansari.4. Complainant also submits that matter has been amicably settled and hasshown copy of one Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of even date. Original has been returned to the complainant w...
Sh. Devi Dayal Gupta (Since Deceased) Through Lrs vs Sh. Nafe Singh Gu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 88/2026, CM APPL. 5495/2026 SH. DEVI DAYAL GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chirag Anand & Mr. Vireshwar Tyagi, Advs. versus SH. NAFE SINGH GUPTA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Gupta, Mr. Mayank Tomar & Mr. Prateek Singh Sikarwar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ORDER % 02.02.2026 CM APPL. 5496/2026 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application is disposed of. RFA 88/2026, CM APPL. 5495/2026 3. Appeal under Section 96 C.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against Judgment dated 13.05.2025 and Final Decree dated 11.11.2025 passed by learned DJ-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Court, Delhi in CS No.1804/2016, in regard to immovable property bearing No.59, Gali No.2, Near MCD Primary School, Chandu Park, Krishan Nagar, Delhi (area admeasuring 264 sq. Yards). 4. Only grievance of the Appellant, who ...
Ruby vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 273/2026& CRL.M.A. 2213/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2214/2026 RUBY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit with Ms. Shagun Saini, Ms. Archana Shahi, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP with SI Asha. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Applicant-Ruby seeks regular bail in FIR No. 359/2021 dated 22.10.2021, for commission of offences under Sections 376/506 of IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, registered at P.S. Sarita Vihar. 2. She is, reportedly, in custody since 12.11.2021 and learned counsel for applicant submits that the victim has already been examined and she has not whispered even a single word against the applicant. 3. The copy of the testimony of the applicant has also been placed on record which does indicate that she has not come up with any allegation against the applica...
Bhaskar Yadav vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 17.01.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 281/2025, CRL.M.A. 2023/2025 & CRL.M.A. 6891/2025 BHASKAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Samarth Krishan Luthra, Mr. Arjun Kakkar and Mr. Manoviraj Singh, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for ED. 2 + BAIL APPLN. 330/2025, CRL.M.A. 2409/2025 & CRL.M.A. 7482/2025 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhir Datt, Mr. Debayan Gangopadhyay, Mr. Arjun Kakkar and Ms. Varnika Singh, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel with Mr. Kanishk Maurya and Mr. Satyam Prakash, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJUDGMENT1. These anticipatory bail applications arising out of same Prosecution Complaint and...
Sh. Pardeep Singh Rathee & Anr. vs the State N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 602/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2379/2026SH. PARDEEP SINGH RATHEE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar with Mr. Ashish Mishra, Advocate with petitioners in person. versusTHE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with W/ASI Pushpa Rani with SI Balshwar, PS Najafgarh. Mr. Puneet Yadav, Advocate with respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 (through V.C.)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seeks quashing of FIR No. 95/2024 dated 15.04.2024, registered at P.S. Najaf Garh, for commission of offences under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 25.06.2009 as per Hindu rites and customs. They were blesse...
Rajender Yadav vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.02.2026 + CRL.M.C. 845/2026, CRL.M.A. 3346/2026 & 3347/2026 RAJENDER YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Alok, AdvocateversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Rahul, PS Malviya NagarCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. Petitioner has assailed order dated 13.10.2025 of the Court of Sessions whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the petition is completely frivolous.3. At the very outset, the legal position was pointed out to counsel for petitioner as follows. The provision under Section 438(3) BNSS (Section 397(3) CrPC) prohibits second revision petition. What is explicitly prohibited by law cannot be allowed a backdoor entry unless the petitioner is able to establish a cas...
Rajeshwar Dayal vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1383/2026 & CM APPL. 6810-6811/2026 RAJESHWAR DAYAL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: MR. Parminder Singh and Mr. Aryanshu Vaibhav Gautam, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Mr. Ashu Bhatia and Mr. Shadwali Singh, Advocates for R-2 and R-3. Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, Advocate for R-9.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL ORDER % 02.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent no.1/Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to prevent unauthorized construction being carried out by the respondents no.2 to 7 and also a direction to remove the unauthorized construction from property bearing No. RZ-68/256, Plot No.68, measuring 167 sq. yds. part of Khasra No.234, 255 and 256, situated in the area of Village Nasirpur, Colony known as Dayal Park, West Sagarpur, New Delhi-110046 (hereinafter the subject property). 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 446
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 451
- 452
- Next ›
- Last »