Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Santosh Kumar vs Kanchan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 5/2025, CM APPL. 367/2025 & CM APPL. SANTOSH KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Neeraj Rathi, Adv. (through VC)versusKANCHAN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 03.02.20261. The present appeal has been filed under Section 28(4) of the HinduMarriage Act, 1955 (HMA) read with Section 19 of the Family Court, 1984 assailing the Order dated 11.07.2024 passed by the Learned Family Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in HMA no. 2241 of 2022, whereby, the application under Section 24 of the HMA has been allowed and the appellant has been directed to pay a consolidated monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month to the respondent for herself and the minor daughter, from the date of filing of the application till further orders/during pendency of the petition.2. Perusal of the record shows that the salary certificate of the appellant...
Pappu Chauhan vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 628/2026 PAPPU CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dileep Kumar Mishra, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. SI Vijay Kumar, PS-Dwarka North. Respondent No. 2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 03.02.2026 CRL.M.C. 628/20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 121/2017 dated 07.05.2017, registered at Police Station Dwarka North, District South West, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC],alongwith all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue Notice. Notice is accepted by Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State.3. Pursuant to an order dated 23.01.2026, Mr. Dileep Kumar...
Arman vs the State N.C.T of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4835/2025 ARMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Chetan Pangasa, Ms. Kanika Vohra, Advs.VersusTHE STATE N.C.T OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 03.02.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant ofanticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 550/2025, registered at Police Station Model Town, Delhi, for the commission of the offence punishable under Sections 74/115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter BNS).2. The brief facts of the present case are that on the intervening night of31.10.2025 / 01.11.2025, at about 01:00 AM, the complainant was standing on the street in front of her house along with her husband, as they were about to leave for Prahladpur, Delhi. While the complainants husband had gone to bring the car from the parking area, the co-accused per...
Rashi Santosh Soni & Anr. vs Mr. Rajesh Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 695/2025, CM APPL. 77901/2025 & CM APPL. RASHI SANTOSH SONI & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Archana Sahadeva, Ms. Jaspreet S Kapur, Ms. Shweta and Mr. Wasim Ansari, Advs.versusMR. RAJESH SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 03.02.2026C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This is a somewhat peculiar case in which the learned Commercial Court has dismissed a suit on the sole ground that the Local Commissioner1 who was appointed in the matter had visited twopremises of the respondent, though she was directed, by the orderappointing her, to visit one.2. The appellants were the plaintiffs before the learned DistrictJudge (Commercial)-02 Central, Tis Hazari Courts2 in CS(Comm) LC hereinafter 2 learned Commercial Court hereinafter Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 6 copyright and design rights held by the appellants in respect...
Cosmo Trading Company vs Nv Distilleries and Breweries Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2110/2025 COSMO TRADING COMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Pandit, Mr. Saahil Mongia and Ms. Aditi Singhal, Advocates.versusNV DISTILLERIES AND BREWERIES PVT. LTD......Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Sanghi, Mr. Nikhil Singh, Ms. Khushbu Sahu, Mr. Raahithya Raj Mishra, Mr. Ashish Mishra, Mr. Keshav, Mr. Sujith Suresh, Ms. Sana Rais and Mr. Aditya Singh Raghuvanshi, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 03.02.20261. By way of this petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act), the petitioner seeks appointment of a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties under the PurchaseOrder dated 02.10.2023. The agreement provides for resolution of disputesby arbitration. The arbitration clause on the Purchase Order is extracted as under: ARBITRATION: That all disputes related to the Purchaseorder shall be referred to the sole Arbitrator appointed by theNVDB...
Jitender Singh Lamba vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 891/2026, CRL.M.A. 3547-3549/2026 JITENDER SINGH LAMBA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 03.02.20261. After some arguments, Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take such remedies as may be available in law.2. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.3. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case. PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026 SS/KA/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:04:25...
Dhan Prakash Gupta vs Vinod Malik
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 26/2026, CRL.M.A. 3607/2026-Stay, CRL.M.A. 3608/2026-Exp DHAN PRAKASH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradhuman, AdvocateversusVINOD MALIK .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 03.02.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner after canvasing his case, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court for raising the same contentions vehemently argued before this Court.2. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:06:57...
Tek Narayan Shastri vs Sukhbir Singh & Ors (the United India Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 3rd February, 2026 + MAC.APP. 479/2018 TEK NARAYAN SHASTRI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Mini, Ms. Astha Chauhan, Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocates.versusSUKHBIR SINGH & ORS (THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J: (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed assailing the impugned awarded dated 6thJanuary 2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala House Courts, Delhi (MACT) in MACP No.419/2016 seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in favour of appellant/claimant. The accident occurred on 5th March 2015 at about 11:40 AM in front of Banwari Lal Hospital at Panchkuia Road, New Delhi, resulting in registration of FIR No.87/2015 at PS Mandir Marg.Digitally Signed MAC.APP. 479/2018 1 of 62. The offending vehicle was a DTC bus bearing registration no. DL-1PC-8698 which at the relevant ...
Sachin & Anr. vs Canara Bank
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 560/2025, CM APPL. 61873/2025, CM APPL. SACHIN & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Yash Harshvardhan and Mr. Ketan Bhutani, Advocates.versusCANARA BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naman Shukla, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 03.02.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The dispute between the parties stands settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.2. The settlement agreement dated 7 November 2025 arrived at between the parties is on record.3. We have perused the settlement agreement and we find that it is lawful and capable of enforcement.4. The parties would abide by the terms of settlement. Accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication in the appeal. Signed By:RAJEEV RFA(COMM) 560/2025 Page 1 of 25. The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/...
Neeraj @ Kuppa vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 5/2026 NEERAJ @ KUPPA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vrinda Bhandari and Ms. Pragya Barsaiyan, Advocates (DHCLSC)versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates for Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with SI Vivek, PS: Neb SaraiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 03.02.20261. The petitioner, vide the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeks issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant custody parole for a period of six hours enabling him to visit his ailing father who is admitted in Nehru Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the Court in accordance with law as and when requi...
- ‹ Prev
- 435
- 436
- 437
- 438
- 439
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 445
- Next ›
- Last »