Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr. Harmeet Singh vs Border Security Force

Dr. Harmeet Singh vs Border Security Force

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1257660

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(C)/2738/2026
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. Harmeet Singh

Advocate Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Mr. Amit Rana, Ms. Sonali Modi, Mr. Mukul Dev

Respondent

Border Security Force

Advocate Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 2738/2026dr. harmeet singh.....petitioner through: dr. s s hooda and mr. shaurya banshtu, advs.versusborder security force.....respondent through: mr. siddhartha shankar ray, cgsc, mr. amit rana, ms. sonali modi and mr. mukul dev, advs.coram:hon'ble mr. justice v. kameswar raohon'ble ms. justice manmeet pritam singh aroraorder% 26.02.20261. this petition has been filed with the following prayers:-“(a) issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to pass a reasoned order deciding the post confirmation petition u/s 117(2) of the bsf act preferred by the petitioner against findings and sentence of the ld. gsfc and revision gsfc conducted in respect of the petitioner; and(b) award the cost of litigation in favour of thepetitioner;”2. mr. siddhartha shankar ray, learned counsel for the respondent statesthat the respondent shall decide the post confirmation petition filed by thepetitioner within eight weeks from today as an outer limit and the decision would be conveyed to the petitioner. the submission is taken on record.3. if the petitioner is still aggrieved, liberty shall be with the petitioner toavail remedy, in accordance with law.4. the present petition is disposed of.v. kameswar rao, jmanmeet pritam singh arora, jfebruary 26, 2026/sr

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2738/2026

DR. HARMEET SINGH

.....Petitioner Through: Dr. S S Hooda and Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Advs.

versus

BORDER SECURITY FORCE

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC, Mr. Amit Rana, Ms. Sonali Modi and Mr. Mukul Dev, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

ORDER

% 26.02.2026

1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

“(a) Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to pass a reasoned order deciding the Post Confirmation Petition U/s 117(2) of the BSF Act preferred by the Petitioner against Findings and Sentence of the Ld. GSFC and Revision GSFC conducted in respect of the Petitioner; and

(b) Award the cost of Litigation in favour of the

Petitioner;”

2. Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, learned counsel for the respondent states

that the respondent shall decide the post confirmation petition filed by the

petitioner within eight weeks from today as an outer limit and the decision would be conveyed to the petitioner. The submission is taken on record.

3. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, liberty shall be with the petitioner to

avail remedy, in accordance with law.

4. The present petition is disposed of.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

FEBRUARY 26, 2026/sr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial