Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Janki Devi vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Janki Devi vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1256526

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(CRL)/535/2026
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Janki Devi

Advocate Mr. Sanjay Lao, Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva

Respondent

State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(crl) 535/2026 & crl.m.a. 5028/2026janki devi.....petitioner through: none.versusstate (govt. of nct of delhi) & anr......respondents through: mr. sanjay lao, standing counsel (crl.) with ms. priyam agarwal and mr. aryan sachdeva, advocates for the state with si udit, p.s.ranhola.coram:hon'ble mr. justice navin chawlahon'ble mr. justice ravinder dudejaorder% 26.02.20261. this petition has been filed under article 226 of theconstitution of india, seeking production of ms. xxx.2. the respondents have filed the status report dated 25.02.2026,which states that the missing girl has come back to her house, and is presently staying with the petitioner. it is further stated that based on the statement of the missing girl, in fir no. 73/2026, offences under section 64(1) of bharatiya nyaya sanhita, 2023 (bns) and section 6 of protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 (pocso) have also been added and the investigation has been handed over to a female police officer.3. keeping in view the fact that the missing girl has beenretrieved, and is presently with the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.4. we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on thestatement of the girl or the action taken consequent thereto by the respondents.5. the petition is, accordingly, disposed of.navin chawla, jravinder dudeja, jfebruary 26, 2026/ib/sk/ik

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 535/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5028/2026

JANKI DEVI

.....Petitioner Through: None.

versus

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates for the State with SI Udit, P.S.Ranhola.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

ORDER

% 26.02.2026

1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking production of Ms. XXX.

2. The respondents have filed the Status Report dated 25.02.2026,

which states that the missing girl has come back to her house, and is presently staying with the petitioner. It is further stated that based on the statement of the missing girl, in FIR No. 73/2026, offences under Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) have also been added and the investigation has been handed over to a female Police Officer.

3. Keeping in view the fact that the missing girl has been

retrieved, and is presently with the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

4. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the

statement of the girl or the action taken consequent thereto by the respondents.

5. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J

FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ib/sk/ik

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial