Delhi Development Authority vs Sachin Kumar & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1270208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1270208
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/12550/2025
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Delhi Development Authority

Advocate Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. D. Sharma

Respondent

Sachin Kumar & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 12550/2025 and cm appl. 51173/2025 delhi development authority .....petitioner through: ms. niharika ahluwalia, mr. d. sharma, advs.versussachin kumar & ors. .....respondents through: mr. amitesh kumar, ms. priti kumari, mr. pankaj kumar ray, advs.coram:hon'ble mr. justice anil kshetarpalhon'ble mr. justice amit mahajanorder% 27.02.20261. a perusal of the record reflects that the certified copy of theorder dated 27.02.2025 [hereinafter referred to as ‘impugned order’]passed by the central administrative tribunal [hereinafter referred to as ‘cat’] which has been placed on record by the petitioner is incomprehensible. the impugned order is concluded at printed page no. 40 of the paper book, while printed page no. 41 vaguely begins with some para no. 2 going up to page 57 but there is no conclusion.2. a perusal of the impugned order reflects that cat has taken uptwo original applications (‘oa’) bearing nos.2266/2023 and issue. on one hand, the oa filed by the respondents was disposed of with liberty to file a fresh oa for it was very clumsily drafted and on the other hand, the tribunal has also proceeded to issue certain directions simultaneously.3. keeping in view the aforesaid position, the present petition isdisposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before cat for clarification/modification of the impugned order. the pending application also stands closed.anil kshetarpal, j.amit mahajan, j.february 27, 2026 jai/kb

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 12550/2025 and CM APPL. 51173/2025 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. D. Sharma, Advs.
versus
SACHIN KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

ORDER

% 27.02.2026

1. A perusal of the record reflects that the certified copy of the

Order dated 27.02.2025 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’]

passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as ‘CAT’] which has been placed on record by the Petitioner is incomprehensible. The Impugned Order is concluded at printed page no. 40 of the paper book, while printed page no. 41 vaguely begins with some Para no. 2 going up to page 57 but there is no conclusion.

2. A perusal of the Impugned Order reflects that CAT has taken up

two Original Applications (‘OA’) bearing Nos.2266/2023 and issue. On one hand, the OA filed by the Respondents was disposed of with liberty to file a fresh OA for it was very clumsily drafted and on the other hand, the tribunal has also proceeded to issue certain directions simultaneously.

3. Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the present Petition is

disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to file an appropriate application before CAT for clarification/modification of the Impugned Order. The pending application also stands closed.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

FEBRUARY 27, 2026 jai/kb

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Delhi Development Authority vs Sachin Kumar & Ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit ...