Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jatadhari Shikshan Prashikshan Mahavidyalaya vs National Council for T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2817/2026 & CM APPL. 13668/2026JATADHARI SHIKSHAN PRASHIKSHAN MAHAVIDYALAYA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish Adv Mr. Ravi Kant Adv Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Adv.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) quash the withdrawal order dated 29.05.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 whereby it has arbitrarily withdrawn the recognition of Petitioners D.El.Ed. course from the academic session 2025-26; and(b) direct the Respondent No.2 to issue a communication infavour of the Petitioner thereby declaring it to be an Institution duly recognised for running the D.El.Ed. course; and(c) consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to update itswebsite by displaying the re...
Anil Arora vs Achal Sharma
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 452/2026, CM APPL. 13585/2026 & CM APPL. 13586/2026 ANIL ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Arora, Advocate.versusACHAL SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitionerseeks permission to withdraw the present petition.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/nd/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:19:52...
Prajapita Brahma Kumaris Ishwariya Vishwa Vidyalaya vs Govt. of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2835/2026, CM APPL. 13768/2026 and CM APPL.PRAJAPITA BRAHMA KUMARIS ISHWARIYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA .....Petitioner Through: Mrs Meera Kaura Patel, Mrs Ritika Saini and Mr. Prince Goyal, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shiven Varma, Panel Counsel GNCTD and Mr. Rudraksh mathur, Advs. for R-1. Mr. R. K. Dhawan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Nisha Dhawan and Mr. Pawan Karan Deo, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.02.20261. The petitioner is aggrieved by the public notice dated 17.02.2026issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi, Public Works Department [PWD]. The said notice is extracted as under:NOTICEIn compliance with the directions of the Honble High Court of Delhi Case No. W.P.(C) 10706/2023 to remove the unauthorized encroachment on from Ram Dev Chowk to Narela Railway Crossing and Safiabad Mor to Safiabad Border on Narela Bawana Road. Accor...
Portanri Pakyntein vs the State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 864/2026 PORTANRI PAKYNTEIN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, Ms. Marbiang Khougwin, Mr. Prang Newmai, Mr. Saurabh Singh, Advs.VersusTHE STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Upasana Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr. Divya Bakshi and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. SI- Manish, PS: Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 20.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 12059/2026 (For revival of present bail application)1. By virtue of the present application, the applicant seeks revival ofthe present bail application, which was dismissed by this Court on 27.02.2026 in compliance of the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by the Honble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.1923/2026.2. For the reasons stated therein, as also in view of order dated13.04.2026 passed by the Honble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.1923/2026, the present application is allowed.3. As such, the...
Mahinder Dhawan vs the State Govt of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1624/2026, CRL.M.A. 6611/2026 MAHINDER DHAWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Sharma, Modh. Akram and Mr. Khurshid Alam, Advs.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakhi and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. Mr. A.K. Jha and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advs. for Victim ASI- Ramchander Singh, MACT CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.36/2023 dated 06.02.2023 registered at PS: Connaught Place under Sections 279/304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Deed dated 24.02.2026 [Annexure P5] arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent nos.2 to 6, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identities.2. I...
Shekh Ismail vs State of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 856/2026 SHEKH ISMAIL .....Applicant Through: Mr. Kedar Yadav, Adv.versusSTATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakhi and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. Insp. U. Balashankaram, PS: GazipurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising out of FIR No.121/2025 registered at PS: Ghazipur under Sections 103(1)/61(2)/249(a)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. After some arguments, since learned counsel for the applicant seeksto withdraw the present application, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Del...
Chandrvati, Age-69 & Ors. vs State of Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1636/2026 CHANDRVATI, AGE-69 & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate.versusSTATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Krishan, P.S. Palam Village. Mr. Mayank Deswal, Mr. Shivam, Mr. Dhananjay Mittal, Mr. Mahesh Batra and Ms. Smriti Walia, Advocates for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6641/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 1636/20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 529/2023 dated 17.08.2023, registered at Police Station Palam Village, District South West, New Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], a...
Vivek Degree Teacher Training College vs National Council for Teacher ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2790/2026 & CM APPL. 13521/2026 VIVEK DEGREE TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv with Mr. Mayank Manish Adv Mr. Ravi Kant Adv Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Adv.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) quash the Refusal Order dated 29.01.2026 issued by the Respondent No.2 (through email dated 29.01.2026), whereby, the Respondent No.2 has Refused the application of the Petitioner Institution submitted for transition of its B.A. B.Ed./ B.Sc. B.Ed. course to I.T.E.P., for the academic session 2026- 27; without following the mandatory procedure; and(b) direct the Respondent No.2 to restore, reconsider & decidethe aforesaid applic...
Monto Chadha vs Savita Bhatnagar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 53/2023 MONTO CHADHA .....Appellant Through: Appellant in person.versusSAVITA BHATNAGAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.02.20261. Appellant in person appears and seeks permission to withdraw presentAppeal in terms of Settlement dated 27.02.2026.2. In view of submissions made, present Appeal along with pendingApplications is dismissed as withdrawn.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.FEBRUARY 27, 2026/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:29:44...
Bharti Sharma vs State of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1290/2022 BHARTI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSTATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner today. Also, nosteps have been taken by the petitioner for serving the respondent no.2 in furtherance of order dated 21.01.2026.2. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the presentcase.2. As such, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-appearance and non-prosecution.SAURABH BANERJEE, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:43:59...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »