Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lajwanti Devi vs Delhi Milk Scheme & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 32/2026 and CM APPL. 47/2026 LAJWANTI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Lavanya Bhardwaj, Advocate.VersusDELHI MILK SCHEME & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Shagun Sabharwal, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL. 48/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 32/2026 and CM APPL. 47/20261. At the oral request of the petitioner, the respondent no.2 is directed tobe deleted from the array of parties. Respondent no.1 be impleaded through Union of India. Let the petitioner to file the amended memo of parties during the course of the day.2. For the nature of the direction, which the Court intends to pass, it is not necessary to direct for issuance of notice to respondent no.1.3. The petitioner is assailing the order dated 18....
Som Datt Builders Pvt Ltd vs Karan Development Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 18/2026 SOM DATT BUILDERS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kharb, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Ms. Meenakshi Sood & Ms. Muskan Katyayan, Advs.versusKARAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Srivastava, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with the Sub-contract dated 19.06.2006 executed between the parties herein. The Arbitration Clause contained in the Sub-contract dated 19.06.2006 is reproduced herein below: 15. ARBITRATION 15.1 Any dispute or difference between CONTRACTOR and SUB- CONTRACTOR arising out of this Agreement which cannot be resolved amicably shall be in the first instance be referred to the Chief Executive of the CONTRACTOR who shall endeavor to reach agreement. 15.2 Should t...
Union of India & Ors. vs Capt (Ts) R K Sabherwal (Retd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 25/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Akash Chatterjee, SPC.versusCAPT (TS) R K SABHERWAL (RETD) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shakti Chand Jaidwal and Mr. Akshat Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGHARORAORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL. 40/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 25/2026, CM APPL. 39/20263. This writ petition lays a challenge to an order dated 16.07.2024passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in Original Application (OA) No. 3046/2022 read with MA filed by the respondent by directing in paragraph 12 onwards as under:- 12. The issue of attributability of disease is no longer res integra in view of the verdict of the Hon'ble ApexCourt in Dharamvir Singh v. Union of India (supra), wherein it is clearly spe...
Som Datt Builders Pvt Ltd vs Karan Development Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 19/2026 SOM DATT BUILDERS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kharb, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Ms. Meenakshi Sood & Ms. Muskan Katyayan, Advs.versusKARAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Srivastava, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with the Sub-contract dated 27.03.2008 executed between the parties herein: 10 ARBITRATION:10.1 Any dispute or difference relating to the Joint Venture or arising under the Contract of the provisions of this Agreement which may arise between the partners of the Joint Ventures during the life of this Agreement which cannot be resolved amicably shall in the first instance be referred to the Managing Director of each of the Joint Ventures who shall endeavor to rea...
Himanshu Singhal and Ors vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 30/2026 HIMANSHU SINGHAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 05.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 46/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 30/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the former husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No.87/2024 dated 17.01.2024 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S.: Saket, Delhi.2. The petition is premised on Settlement Agreement dated 19.11.2024 arrived at through mediation before the Mediation Centre, Saket CRL.M.C. 30/2026 Page 1 of 3Courts, New Delhi; and Divorce Decree dated 16.0...
Raj Kumar Alias Rajesh Kumar and Ors. vs the State Govt Nct of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 45/2026 RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Raj Kumar Mr. Nand Kishor, Advocate for respondent No.2 and respondent No.2 through V.C.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 127/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 45/20261. The present petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 829/2023 dated09.12.2023, registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The FIR in question was registered on the basis of the complaint of Kajal (respondent No.2 herein).3. The complaint was...
Sourav Sekhar Behera vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 19/2026 & CRL.M.As. 147-148/2026 SOURAV SEKHAR BEHERA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocate for State. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, CGSC with Mr. Govind Singh Chauhan, Advocates for R-3. SI Dheeraj Gupta, PS- Laxmi Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 05.01.20261. The petitioner, who appears in person, has filed this writ petitionunder Article 226 of the Constitution, with the following prayers: I. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or directing the respondents herein to provide all his granted remedy available under law as mentioned in the facts of list no. 1(f), which need to be understood along with the judicial notice of laws/laws in forces/facts available in list no. 1(b), as per Supreme Court grantorder of date 12.12.2025 without any constitutional violations...
M/S R.K. Jain and Sons Hospitality Services(P) Ltd vs New Delhi Munici ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 14/2026 & I.A. Nos.28-30/2026 M/S R.K. JAIN AND SONS HOSPITALITY SERVICES(P) LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv.versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Dedhiya, Standing Counsel with Ms. Apurva Sachdev, Mr. Preyansh Gupta, Advs. for NDMC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [in short Act] whereby the petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of agreement dated 10.06.2011.2. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner has invited attention of the Court to Clause 25 of the agreement which provides for settlement of disputes by arbitration. Clause 25 reads thus: CLAUSE 25 Settlement of disputes & Arbitration Except where otherwise provided in the contract, all que...
Narendra Sharma vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 46/2026 and CM APPL. 111/2026 NARENDRA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vakul Sharad, Advocate.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, SPC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 05.01.20261. Learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with further liberty to pursue his representation and to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, along with all pending application(s). PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 5, 2026 Nc/mjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/01/2026 at 11:45:29...
Babu Singh vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 37/2026, CM APPL. 73/2026 & CM APPL. 74/2026 BABU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, Ms. Rupali Panwar, Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Usha Jamnal, GP for R-1. Mr. S. Rajappa, Mr. R. Gowrishankar, Mr. G. Dhivyasri, Advocates for R-2 to 4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 05.01.20261. After making submissions for some time, Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra,counsel for the Petitioner, states that he would like to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to other appropriate remedies, if any, in accordance with law.2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. SANJEEV NARULA, J JANUARY 5, 2026/abThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC ...
- ‹ Prev
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 372
- 373
- Next ›
- Last »