Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Okoli Anayo Frankline vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: January 08, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4027/2025 OKOLI ANAYO FRANKLIN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Javed Khan, Adv.VersusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State alongwith Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. and SI Akash Deep, Special Staff, North District.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 read withSection 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising from FIR No.168/2021 dated 10.11.2021 registered at PS.: Maurice Nagar, Delhi under Sections 21/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946.2. As per FIR, on 09.11.2021 at about 09:00 PM, secret information wasreceived that two citizens of African...
Mohd. Jabir vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: January 15, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3346/2025 MOHD. JABIR .....Applicant Through: Mr. U.A. Khan and Mr. Tushar Upadhyay, Advocates.VersusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates SI Karambir Singh Rawat, Anti Narcotics Cell.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231 read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising from FIR No.637/2020 dated 28.10.2020 registered under Sections 21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19853 at PS: Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi.2. As per FIR, on 27.10.2020 at about 07:45 PM, secret information was Hereinafter BNSS Hereinafter Cr.P.C. Hereinafter NDPS ActBAIL AP...
August Ventures Private Limited vs Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgement Delivered on: 31.01.2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024, I.A. 45128/2024&I.A. 45132/2024 INNOCENTI SA .....AppellantversusEXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Dr. Sheetal Vohra, Mr. Rahul Dwivedi, Mr. Sridharan Rajan Ramkumar, Ms. Annanya Mehan, Mr. Ashutosh & Ms. Sakshi Rathore, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC along with Mr. Mayank Sansanwal & Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari, Ms. Bhavya Gupta & Ms. Priyanshi Bhageria, Advocates for Respondent No.4. + W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025, CM 223/2025 & CM 224/2025 AUGUST VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED .....PetitionerversusREGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Signature Not Verified C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024 & Connected Matters Page 1 of 43 Advocates w...
Dalbir vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: January 13, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4209/2025 DALBIR .....Applicant Through: Mr. Hariom, Adv. (through VC)VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Adv. SI- Rinku B., Anti Narcotic Cell, North District.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 read witherstwhile Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising from FIR No.463/2025 dated 19.06.2025 registered at PS.: Kashmere Gate, Delhi under Sections 52(2)/33/58 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 (Excise Act) read with Section 112 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).2. As per FIR, on 19.06.2025 at about 06:30 AM, a secret informer cameto the office of Anti-Narcotics Cell, Kashmiri Gate and conveyed the information that a white Hyundai Accen...
Bhartiya Postal Emp Unoin & an vs U.O.I & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3861-62/2006 BHARTIYA POSTAL EMP UNOIN & ANR .....Petitioners Through: None.versusU.O.I & ANR .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The matter has been called twice.2. There is no representation on behalf of the parties, hence, the present Petition along with pending applications, is dismissed for non- prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 31, 2026/sp/hr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:02:09...
Uoi vs Sudhan Ram
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6358/2006, CM APPL. 5252/2006, CM APPL. UOI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Ms. Priya Advs.versusSUDHAN RAM .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The present Petition has been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years.2. None appears on behalf of the Respondent.3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits thatpursuant to the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), the Respondent has never claimed the benefit of Grade-I Driver in the MT cadre with effect from 01.01.1996, though the said benefit was extended to the Respondent with effect from 29.07.1999. Learned counsel further prays that the present Petition may be disposed of with liberty to file an application for revival of the same in the event the Respondent raises any claim in t...
Shivam vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: January 13, 2026 % Pronounced on: January 31, 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4367/2025 STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 4530/2025 STATE OF NCT DELHI .....RespondentCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present bail application(s) under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of a regular bail in proceedings arising from e-FIR No.80051276/2025 dated BAIL APPLN. 4367/2025 & BAIL APPLN. 4530/2025 Page 1 of 4 27.05.2025 in BAIL APPLN. 4367/2025 and FIR No.21/2025 dated 01.07.2025 in BAIL APPLN. 4530/2025 registered under Section(s) 303(2),317(2)& 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) as also Section(s) 67,74 &78 of the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002 at PS.: Metro Police Station (Netaji Subhash Palace), Delhi.2. As per facts, the said FIR(s) were registered following an incident onthe intervening ...
Dir.Gen. Employees State Insur vs Dr.Mrs.Reeta Mahajan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4016-17/2006 DIR.GEN. EMPLOYEES STATE INSUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Ms. Kaveri Rawal and Ms. Mallika Luthra, Advs.versusDR.MRS.REETA MAHAJAN ....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The present Petition has been filed assailing the Order dated 28.10.2005, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, PrincipalBench, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal], whereby the orderof the Disciplinary Authority imposing penalty of withholding five increments of the Respondent without cumulative effect was set aside/quashed.2. This Petition has come up for hearing after a lapse of about 20 years.3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner is unable to apprisethe Court as to whether the Respondent, upon attaining the age of superannuation, has demitted office or not. Upon a perusal of the list of dates and event...
HC (Dvr) Ramesh Kumar vs Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3642/2006, CM APPL. 15635/2009 HC (DVR) RAMESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kushagra Kumar, SPC for R-1 to R-3 with Mr. ASI Devinder, Delhi PoliceCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The matter has been called twice.2. The Petitioner remains unrepresented, hence, the present Petition along with pending application, is dismissed for non- prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 31, 2026/sp/hr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:02:04...
U.O.I & Ors vs Ms. Sheetal Arora
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5629/2006 & W.P.(C) 5630-5631/2006 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Ms. Priya Advs.versusMS. SHEETAL ARORA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that thepresent Petitions have been rendered infructuous, as the services of the Respondent have already been regularized to the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) with effect from 31.08.2010.2. Vide the Impugned Order dated 20.12.2005, the CentralAdministrative Tribunal (CAT) had directed the Petitioners to consider the Respondent for re-appointment on ad hoc basis to the post of LDC and not to replace her with a contractual employee.3. In view of the fact that the services of the Respondent have since been regularized, the present Petitions stand dismissed as...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »