Uoi vs Sudhan Ram

UOI vs Sudhan Ram

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Jan 31, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1271502

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1271502
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Decided On: Jan 31, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/6358/2006
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

UOI

Advocate Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Ms. Priya

Respondent

Sudhan Ram

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 6358/2006, cm appl. 5252/2006, cm appl. uoi .....petitioner through: ms. arunima dwivedi, cgsc with ms. himanshi singh, ms. monalisha pradhan, ms. priya advs.versussudhan ram .....respondent through: none.coram:hon'ble mr. justice anil kshetarpalhon'ble mr. justice amit mahajanorder% 31.01.20261. the present petition has been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years.2. none appears on behalf of the respondent.3. learned counsel representing the petitioner submits thatpursuant to the order passed by the learned central administrative tribunal („cat‟), the respondent has never claimed the benefit of grade-i driver in the mt cadre with effect from 01.01.1996, though the said benefit was extended to the respondent with effect from 29.07.1999. learned counsel further prays that the present petition may be disposed of with liberty to file an application for revival of the same in the event the respondent raises any claim in the future.4. in view of the aforesaid submissions, the present petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. the pending applications also stand closed.anil kshetarpal, j.amit mahajan, j.january 31, 2026 jai/pal

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6358/2006, CM APPL. 5252/2006, CM APPL. UOI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Ms. Priya Advs.
versus
SUDHAN RAM .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

ORDER

% 31.01.2026

1. The present Petition has been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years.

2. None appears on behalf of the Respondent.

3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that

pursuant to the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal („CAT‟), the Respondent has never claimed the benefit of Grade-I Driver in the MT cadre with effect from 01.01.1996, though the said benefit was extended to the Respondent with effect from 29.07.1999. Learned counsel further prays that the present Petition may be disposed of with liberty to file an application for revival of the same in the event the Respondent raises any claim in the future.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present Petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. The pending applications also stand closed.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

JANUARY 31, 2026 jai/pal

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties UOI vs Sudhan Ram Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit ...