Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajay Sehgal & Ors vs.state & Anr

Ajay Sehgal & Ors vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 13, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225271

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajay Sehgal & Ors

Advocate Mr. Nishant Sharma

Respondent

State & Anr

Advocate Mr. Hirein Sharma

Excerpt

.....incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 13.04.2017.6. divorce has taken place between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 on 11.02.2019. matter was referred to mediation centre where a settlement deed dated 08.06.2018 was executed. total settlement amount came to ₹4,50,000/-. it is submitted that part payment of the settlement amount is already received by the respondent no.2. the balance amount of ₹50,000/- in cash is handed over to the respondent no.2 today in court.7. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si asi chandar pal singh, police station - farsh bazar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. crl.m.c. 4591/2019 page 2 of 3 8. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.9. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.49/2018 dated 16.02.2018 registered at police station - farsh bazar, new delhi instituted for the offences punishable under sections 498a/4of the ipc and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.10. the petition is allowed accordingly.11. order dasti, under the signatures of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge september13 2019 pb crl.m.c. 4591/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

13. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 AJAY SEHGAL & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with ASI Chandar Pal Singh, PS - Farsh Bazar, New Delhi ........ RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 35696/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 2. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.49/2018 dated 16.02.2018, registered at Police Station - Farsh Bazar, New Delhi instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Notice.

4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 09.11.2013 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One girl child was born out of the wedlock, namely, Pehal Sehgal. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 13.04.2017.

6. Divorce has taken place between the petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 on 11.02.2019. Matter was referred to mediation centre where a settlement deed dated 08.06.2018 was executed. Total settlement amount came to ₹4,50,000/-. It is submitted that part payment of the settlement amount is already received by the respondent No.2. The balance amount of ₹50,000/- in cash is handed over to the respondent No.2 today in Court.

7. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI ASI Chandar Pal Singh, Police Station - Farsh Bazar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 2 of 3 8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.49/2018 dated 16.02.2018 registered at Police Station - Farsh Bazar, New Delhi instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed accordingly.

11. Order dasti, under the signatures of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER13 2019 PB CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial