Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Leelawati and Ors vs.ramesh Singh Tariyal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~ 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th September, 2019 + FAO272017 LEELAWATI AND ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar Mishra & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs. versus RAMESH SINGH TARIYAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mishra, Adv. for R Mr. Ankit Kalra, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The claim case (No.CWC-D/NDD/22/2016/3013) under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 instituted by the appellants was dismissed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation by the impugned judgment 04.08.2016, observations having been recorded as to the deficiency of evidence with regard to the factum of accident, the place of death and, what is crucial, on the question of employee- employer relationship between the deceased Shesh Narain Chaupal and the first respondent herein, who admittedly is the registered owner of truck bearing registration No.DL-1L-0271.2. Feeling aggrieved by the rejection of the case for compensation, the presen...
Amr India Ltd vs.ntpc Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 $~A-36 * % + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 389/2019 AMR INDIA LTD Through Mr. Brijesh Kumar Goel, Advocate. ........ Petitioner NTPC LTD. versus Through Mr. Puneet Taneja and Mr. ..... Respondent Manmohan Singh Narula, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 13634/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 389/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate, enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.3. This is a petition has been filed under Section 29B(5) read with Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time making the Award.4. The Arbitration commenced on 07.03.2017 under Section 29 B of the Act under the Fast Track Procedure.5. The statutory period of twelve months for making the Award expired on 06.03.2018. The petitioner approached...
Ms. Harjeet Kaur Lamba & Ors. Vs.mr. Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h September, 2019 CS(OS) 553/2018 & IA149272018, IA2382019, IA97062019 MS. HARJEET KAUR LAMBA & ORS. Represented by: Mr.T.C.Sharma, Advocate. ..... Plaintiffs versus MR. RAJINDER PAL SINGH LAMBA ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Samit Khosla, Advocate with defendant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) IA2382019 (u/O.VII R.11 CPC) 1. By this application defendant seeks rejection of the plaint inter alia on the grounds that the Court fee has not been properly paid, the suit is barred by limitation and has been filed mala fidely as the defendant has been in uninterrupted and exclusive possession of the suit property. However, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the defendants only contention is that requisite Court fee has not been paid by the plaintiffs who have ascertained their share in the sum of 4,50,00,000/- and thus should have paid ad valorem Court fee of 4,41,545/- as...
M/S Venus Auto Products of India vs.rohit Vedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 09.2019 RC.REV. 416/2019 & CM APPL.31210/2019 M/S VENUS AUTO PRODUCTS OF INDIA ........ Petitioner versus ROHIT VEDI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Zorawar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.10.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop at ground floor forming part of property No.1468, Gali No.24, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, more particularly shown in red RC.REV. 416/2019 Page 1 of 2 colour in the site plan annexed with the petition.3. Learned counsel...
Shri Jaipal Chand Jain vs.shri Manoj Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13th September, 2019 Decided on:30. h September, 2019 CS(COMM) 473/2017 SHRI JAIPAL CHAND JAIN Represented by: Mr.K.K.Bhuchar, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.M.P.Singh, Mr.Rajiv Mishra, Mr.Ajay Kumar, Ms.Simmi, Mr.Y.R.Singh, Advs. + CS(COMM) 474/2017 ABHISHEK JAIN ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.K.K.Bhuchar, Adv. for the plaintiff with plaintiff in person versus SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.M.P.Singh, Mr.Rajiv Mishra, Mr.Ajay Kumar, Ms.Simmi, Mr.Y.R.Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA108242018 (u/O37Rule 3(5) CPC) in CS (COMM) 473/2017 IA108262018 (u/O37Rule 3(5) CPC) in CS (COMM) 474/2017 1. Plaintiffs have filed the two suits under Order XXXVII CPC seeking money decrees. CS(COMM) Nos. 473/2017 & 474/2017 Page 1 of 11 2. Case of the plaintiff in CS(COMM) 473/2017 is that...
Sicom Ltd. Vs.hanung Toys & Textiles Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:10. 05.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:30. 09.2019 versus versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner CO.PET. 518/2013, CA. Nos.1415/2018 & 1416/2018 SICOM LTD. HANUNG TOYS & TEXTILES LTD. CO.PET. 987/2015, CA. Nos. 718/2018 & 1444/2018 CFSIT, INC SHAKTI BHOG FOODS LIMITED CO.PET. 668/2014, CA. Nos.1366, 1047 & 1048/2018 ABHINANDAN KUMAR JAIN MVL LIMITED CO.PET. 814/2016, CA. Nos.826, 980 & 984/2018 BRIJESH GUPTA & ANR. PREMIA PROJECTS LTD. + 1. + 2. + 3. + 4. Present: Mr.Nikhilesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioner in CP6682014. Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Sjresh Khadav and Mr.Varun K.Bala, Advs. for applicant in CP6682014. Ms.Abha Sinha, Adv. in CA No.444/2019 in CP6682014. Mr.Anil Kumar Airi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhinav Mishra, Mr.Siddhant Tripathi, Ms.Nivedita Chauhan, Mr.Karan Nagpal, Advs. for applicant/Intervener in CA1212019 in CP6682014. Mr....
Ahasaas Agarwal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4992/2019 AHASAAS AGARWAL Through: Mr. Sunil, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Vinay and ASI Bal Krishan, IO, PS Anand Anand Pravat. Mr. Rishab and Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37291/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4992/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.069/2018 dated 18/02/2018, registered at PS Anand Parbat and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4992/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that ...
Naresh Sehrawat & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 5442/2015 NARESH SEHRAWAT & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for R-4 & 5. Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Aman Yadav, Advocates for R-6/AAI. Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral): C.M. No.44012/2019 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice.2. For the reasons explained in the application, the order dated 17.07.2019 dismissing the writ petition for non-prosecution is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number. W.P.(C) 5442/2015 3. With the consent of the parties, we have heard the writ petition finally.4.... Petitioners have filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under W.P.(C) 5442/2015 Page 1...
Rajab Ali Khan vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:04. 09.2019 Order pronounced on:30. 09.2019. + BAIL APPLN. 507/2019 % 1. RAJAB ALI KHAN ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Sugandha Anand, Mr, Surinder Anand & Mr. M.K. Khan, Advs versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State along with Insp. Rakesh Rana, P.S. Welcome. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI ORDER Vide this order I shall dispose of a bail application filed by the petitioner filed u/s. 167 (2) (a) (i) of the CrPC in FIR No.420/2018 u/s. 363/302/201/328/1IPC & 14 POCSO Act, P.S.Welcome, North-East.2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is submitted that one FIR No.420/2018 was registered at PS Welcome u/s. 363 IPC on behest of one Sh. Abid S/o. Banney to the effect that his daughter namely Simran, aged about years is missing from Ball Appl No.507/...
Amit Kumar & Anr vs.govt of Nct Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h September, 2019 + LPA6412019 AMIT KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A. Maitri & Ms. Radhika Chander Sekhar, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, ASC with Mr.Faran Ahmed & Mr. Devendra Verma & Mr.Ved Prakash, Advs. along with SHO PS Mehrauli, Mr. Kushal Singh, Inspector Licensing Branch for R-1 to R-4 & R-6 Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel for SDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL. 43722/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA6412019 & CM APPL.43721/2019 (Stay) 1. Before the learned counsel appearing for the appellant (original petitioner in W.P.(C) 10439/2019) argues in detail, it is fairly submitted by counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 and 6 that the license issued to the LPA6412019 Page 1 of 2 respondent No.7 is already ca...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »