Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaipur Ready Mix Company and Anr vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 09/2019 + W.P.(C) No.10225/2019 JAIPUR READY MIX COMPANY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Advocate with Dr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate and Ms. Priyanka Pandey, Advocate. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent versus Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Advocate, Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Advocate, Ms. Shiva Pandey and Mr. Tilak Raj, ADE (SLF). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) On 23.09.2019, Ms. Mini Pushkarna, learned Standing Counsel for NDMC had entered appearance. We had directed her to produce the original file pertaining to the petitioner. Ms. Pushkarna submits that the original file has been received by her.2. Notice to show cause as to why the petition be not admitted.3. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for NDMC accepts notice on behalf of the respondent...
Union of India & Anr vs.garnegar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :26th September, 2019 + LPA2532019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advs. versus GARNEGAR SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhruv Dwivedi and Mr. Ayush Arora, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER2609.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) LPA2532019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original respondent in WP(C) No.12918/2018, which was allowed by the learned Single Judge, vide judgement and order dated 11th December, 2018, whereby the learned Single Judge permitted that the case of this respondent (original petitioner) may be considered by taking his interview for appointment for the post of Notary Public.2. Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the letter with ...
Tilak Raj Dua vs.rohit Vedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2019 RC.REV. 277/2018 & CM.APPL. 24464-65/2018, 35078/2018, 50359/2018, 36955/2019, _________/2019 TILAK RAJ DUA ........ Petitioner .... Respondent versus ROHIT VEDI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner:... Petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj and Mr. Shwetank Vedi, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. A joint application for recording settlement has also been filed in court. The Registry is directed to register and number the same.2.... Petitioner impugns order dated 27.11.2017, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed. RC.REV.277/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1...
Athar Hashmi vs.parvez Mirza & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2019 RC.REV. 152/2018 & CM APPL. 14935/2018, 14937/2018 ATHAR HASHMI versus PARVEZ MIRZA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Nasir Aziz, Adv. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Absar Ahmad, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 29.08.2017, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop of part of property bearing No.2154-2160, measuring about 100 sq. yards situated at Bazar Lal Kuan, Rodgaran, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attac...
State vs.hawan Pratap Singh @ Pappi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On :13. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced On :26. 09.2019 CRL.A.659/2016 STATE . Appellant versus HAWAN PRATAP SINGH @ PAPPI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For Respondent No.1 For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP : Respondent No.1 in person. : Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted by the state under the provision of section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) assails the judgment dated 01.05.2015, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge-Special FTC-2 (Central), Tis Hazari, Delhi, in Session Case No.37/2013, titled as CRL.A.659/2016 Page 1 of 25 State vs. Hawan Pratap Singh @ Pappi & Anr., emanating from F.I.R No.156/2012 registered at Police Station NDRS; whereby the learned Trial Court has acquitte...
Himanshu vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4914/2019 HIMANSHU ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bandana Grover & Mr.Deepal Goel, Advs. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State. SI Ahishek Kr. PS Amar Colony. Respondent no.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 36998/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.4914/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.195/2019 dated 22.06.2019, registered at PS Amar Colony, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/354-A/354-D/506 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.3 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The ...
Anil Somani & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2019 TEST.CAS. 69/2019 & IA No.13486/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ........ Petitioner ANIL SOMANI Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE & ANR. TEST.CAS. 70/2019 & IA No.13487/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ANSHUL SOMANI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. AND Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE & ORS. TEST.CAS. 71/2019 & IA No.13485/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ........ Petitioners ANIL SOMANI & ORS. Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. AND STATE & ANR. Versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This order is in continuation of the following common order passed in these matters on 19th September, 2019: Test Cas.Nos.69/2019, 70/2019 & 71/2019 Page 1 of 9 All these three petitions seek L...
Anil Somani vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2019 TEST.CAS. 69/2019 & IA No.13486/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ........ Petitioner ANIL SOMANI Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE & ANR. TEST.CAS. 70/2019 & IA No.13487/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ANSHUL SOMANI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. AND Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE & ORS. TEST.CAS. 71/2019 & IA No.13485/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) ........ Petitioners ANIL SOMANI & ORS. Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Ms. Apoorva Bahl and Mr. Pawan Agarwal, Advs. AND STATE & ANR. Versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This order is in continuation of the following common order passed in these matters on 19th September, 2019: Test Cas.Nos.69/2019, 70/2019 & 71/2019 Page 1 of 9 All these three petitions seek L...
Garg Builders Through Shri Mohinder Pal Garg vs.container Corporation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~A-3 * % + ARB.P. 384/2019 GARG BUILDERS THROUGH SHRI MOHINDER PAL GARG Date of decision:26. 09.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate versus CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (CONCOR) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. C.P. Rajwar, Mr. Kamal Kumar, Mr. Aasheesh Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties relating to an agreement dated 08.08.2014.2. The dispute relates to release of Rs. 79,67,474/- towards Service Tax in favour of the petitioner. The stand of the petitioner is that the respondent had adopted GCC of Northern Railway as per the tender condition read with ERRATA Corrigendum. This contains an Arbitration Clause which provides that the CMD will adjudicate the dispute or appo...
M/S Well Protect Manpower Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs.east Delhi Municipal C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
$~56 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :26. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1330/2018 M/S WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr.Mahavir Rawat and Mr.Rohit Prasad, Advts. ........ Petitioner EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. versus Through: Mr.Jagdish Sagar, Adv. for R- ........ RESPONDENTS 1/EDMC. Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Mr.Upendra Sai and Mr.Kamaldeep, Advts. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition arises out a tender bearing No.CT/EDMC/HQ/318, which was floated by respondent No.1 on 29.11.2016. The respondents invited sealed tenders under Two - Bid System to provide the required number of uniform trained man-power for the security services of different buildings/ premises/ hospitals/offices as per the list attached with the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for a period of one year on contract basis/outsourcing basis through e-ten...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »