Himanshu vs.state & Ors.

Himanshu vs State & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 26, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225647

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1225647
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Sep 26, 2019
Subject: Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue: Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Himanshu

Respondent

State & Ors.

Excerpt

.....punishable under sections 323/354-a/354-d/506 ipc and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. crl.m.c. page 1 of 3 4.5. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and respondent no.3 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.3 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.7. respondent no.3 is personally present in court and she has been identified by si abhishek kumar/io and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.8. the petitioner and respondent no.3 are advocates by profession and they have entered into an amicable settlement by mutual consent.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.10. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.195/2019 dated 22.06.2019, registered at ps - amar colony, for the offences punishable under sections 323/354-a/354-d/506 ipc and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed. crl.m.c. page 2 of 3 11. the petition is allowed accordingly.12. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge september26 2019 ab crl.m.c. page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

26. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4914/2019 HIMANSHU ........ Petitioner

Through Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bandana Grover & Mr.Deepal Goel, Advs. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State. SI Ahishek Kr. PS Amar Colony. Respondent no.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 36998/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.4914/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.195/2019 dated 22.06.2019, registered at PS - Amar Colony, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/354-A/354-D/506 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.3 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.3 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent No.3 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by SI Abhishek Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8. The petitioner and respondent no.3 are advocates by profession and they have entered into an amicable settlement by mutual consent.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.195/2019 dated 22.06.2019, registered at PS - Amar Colony, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/354-A/354-D/506 IPC and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed. CRL.M.C. Page 2 of 3 11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER26 2019 ab CRL.M.C. Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Himanshu vs State & Ors. Same Subject Motor Vehicles