Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul Gupta @ Roshan @ Khalla vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 07.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1437/2019 RAHUL GUPTA @ ROSHAN @ KHALLA ........ Petitioner versus STATE ..... Respondent : Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Manjeet Singh Ahluwalia and Mr. Arbind Kumar Gaur, Advs. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Gursewak Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.100/2018 under Section 21 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act for short), Police Station Hari Nagar.2. As per the FIR, secret information was received that one Salman Tyagi would be coming to supply large quantity of Heroine on his motorcycle. Acting on the information a raiding party was prepared. The raiding party reached the spot and laid a trap.3. Subsequently, one person came on a Splender Motorcycle and was BAIL APPLN. 1437/2019 P...
Dlf Home Developers Limited vs.chander Mohan Lall
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 149/2019 & CM Appl.No.29423/2019 (stay) DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LIMITED Through Mr. B.B.Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Pravin Bahadur & Mr. Vishnu Kant, Advocates versus ..... Appellant CHANDER MOHAN LALL Through ..... Respondent Respondent in person with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Aman Dhyani & Ms. Kanchan Semwal, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0507.2019 1. This appeal by DLF Home Developers Limited is directed against the judgment dated 28th March, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of OMP (Comm) No.271/2018 filed by the Respondent under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) raising a limited challenge to an Award dated 31st March, 2018 of the sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes between the parties.2. The facts in brief are that M/s BHL Forex & Finlease Limited (BHL) booked four commercial office spaces with the...
Shiningkart Ecommerce Pvt Ltd. Vs.jiayun Data Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 07.2019 ARB. A. (COMM.) 16/2019 SHININGKART ECOMMERCE PVT LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sachin Dutta, Sr. Adv with and Ms. Mr.Deepak Chaudhary Vinita Shahi, Advs. JIAYUN DATA LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi and Ms. Trishala Trivedi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.8610/2019 1. Allowed, subject to just exception. ARB. A. (COMM.) 16/2019 2. This is an appeal filed under Section 37 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act) against the order dated 31.05.2019. I must indicate at the very outset that in the prayer clause, which obtains in the appeal, there is no reference to the earlier order of the arbitral tribunal, which is, dated 21.04.2019 though, a substantial part of the argument which has been advanced before me by Mr. Dutta, learned senior...
M/S Gattefosse Sas and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 7073/2018 and CM Nos. 26897/2018 &47277/2018 M/S THEMIS MEDICARE LIMITED Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr C. S. Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate with Ms Gunita Pahwa, Mr Raj Dutt and Mr Prashant Dagar, Advocates. :Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Prateek Dhanda, Ms Shruti Dutt and Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for R-1 to R-5. Mr Rahul Verma, Addl. Advocate General for State of Uttarakhand/R-7. Mr Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Advocate with Mr Manish Aggarwal, Mr Anuj Malhotra and Mr Raghav Pandey, Advocates for R-8. Mr Shadman Ali, Advocate for U/Tribunal Daman and Diu. + W.P.(C) 8672/2018& CM No.33293/2018 AND M/S GATTEFOSSE SAS AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Rajeev Bansal, Sr. ...
Rakesh Kumar Garg vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~31. * + % W.P.(C.) No.7071/2019 RAKESH KUMAR GARG IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05.07.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Raghav Nagar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.29464/2019 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7071/2019 & C.M. No.29465/2019 3. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 08.03.2019 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.4485/2018. The Tribunal has W.P.(C.) No.7071/2019 Page 1 of 6 rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioner wherein he had assailed the continuation of his suspension. He was initially placed under suspension on 16.07.2018 on the ground that he had been d...
M/S Dimensions Investment & Securities Limited vs.sh. Uday Dutt & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~CP-3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 07.2019 CRL.O.(CO.) 2/2012 M/S DIMENSIONS INVESTMENT & SECURITIES LIMITED versus SH. UDAY DUTT & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.O.(CO.) 11/2014 M/S UDAY DUTT ASSOCIATES (P) LTD UDAY DUTT & ORS. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS % + + + CRL.O.(CO.) 22/2015 KUBERSWAMY ASHUTOSH CONSULTANTS (P) LTD.(IN PROV.LIQN.) ........ Petitioner SH. MUKUND KUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.Kunal Sharma, Adv. for the OL. versus Mr.Saurabh Soni and Mr.Kshitiz Rao, Advs. for Rajiv Bakshi, ex-director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CA No.1446/2016 in CRL.O.(CO.) 2/2012 1. By this application, the applicant-Mr.Rajeev Bakshi prays that he may be deleted from the array of the parties of the present Crl.O.(CO.) 2/2012. It is submitted in the present application that the winding up petition was filed in 2010 and the applicant had resigned from the claimant Compa...
Santokh Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 07.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1572/2019 SANTOKH SINGH versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. J.S. Khushwaha, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of two months in FIR No.122/2018 under Sections NDPS Act, Police Station Crime Branch on the ground that he is suffering from several ailments and requires urgent surgery.2. As per the medical documents, petitioner has been diagnosed with Hypertension with Umbilical Hernia with chronic swelling right leg and advised surgery.... Petitioner was taken for surgery at Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital but he refused surgery. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the surgery was 3. BAIL APPLN.1572/2019 Page 1 of 3 proposed in Deen Dayal Upadhyay Ho...
M/S Superior Electric Store vs.sant Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h July, 2019 M/S SUPERIOR ELECTRIC STORE + W.P.(C) 9638/2015 & CM No.22902/2015 & 7214/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate. SANT LAL versus Through: Mr. Mahesh Srivastava and Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Advocates. ..... Respondent 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby the Court awarded compensation of Rs.2,25,000/- along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum along with litigation cost of Rs.25,000/- to the respondent for illegal termination.2. The respondent raised an industrial dispute alleging illegal termination by the petitioner on 23rd July, 2009 which was referred to the Labour Court. The respondent pleaded in his statement of claim that he was appointed as an Electrician by the petitioner in 1977 and his last drawn salary was Rs.5,100/- per month; the respondent went on leave to his native village from...
M/S Lunar Electricals vs.national Buildings Construction Corporation L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 854/2011 M/S LUNAR ELECTRICALS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate with Mr. S. K. Chugh, partner in person. (M:9810183600) NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Das, Ms. Geeta and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Das Advocates. (M:8527038398) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed by M/s. Lunar Electricals (hereinafter referred to as Contractor) seeking to take on record the award by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator dated 19th January, 2011. M/s. National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd. (NBCC) has filed objections to the award under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.2. Briefly stated, the background of the case is that the NBCC had called for tenders in respect of Internal Electrification works in HUDCO Vishala Project, New Delhi being Work Order (W.O.) No.22...
M/S Themis Medicare Limited vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 7073/2018 and CM Nos. 26897/2018 &47277/2018 M/S THEMIS MEDICARE LIMITED Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr C. S. Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate with Ms Gunita Pahwa, Mr Raj Dutt and Mr Prashant Dagar, Advocates. :Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Prateek Dhanda, Ms Shruti Dutt and Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for R-1 to R-5. Mr Rahul Verma, Addl. Advocate General for State of Uttarakhand/R-7. Mr Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Advocate with Mr Manish Aggarwal, Mr Anuj Malhotra and Mr Raghav Pandey, Advocates for R-8. Mr Shadman Ali, Advocate for U/Tribunal Daman and Diu. + W.P.(C) 8672/2018& CM No.33293/2018 AND M/S GATTEFOSSE SAS AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Rajeev Bansal, Sr. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »