Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul@ Lala vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1406/2019 RAHUL@LALA versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Anil Basoya, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. SI Rishikesh, P.S.Ambedkar Nagar Mr.Arun Chaudhary, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER2905.2019 Crl.M.A.11949/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 1406/2019 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.195/2019 under Sectionsof the IPC registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi.2. As per the FIR, the prosecutrix knew the family of the petitioner for last 2-3 years as they were neighbours. BAIL APPLN.1406/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. It is alleged that the prosecutrix is a divorcee having divorced her earlier husband in 2016. It is alleged that petitioner approached her and expressed her affection with h...
Indian Progressive Construction Pvt. Ltd vs.simplex Infrastructures Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :29. 05.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM.) 207/2019 INDIAN PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Bhaskar Mishra, Mr.Manish Kumar Choudhary, Ms.Kritika Khurana, Advs. versus SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Nachiketa Goyal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA73882019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. OMP(Comm.) 207/2019 & IA73892019 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 23.01.2019 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 18.12.2013 executed between the parties. O.M.P.(Comm.) No.207/2019 Page 1 2. The State of Jharkhand had granted a mining lease for f...
Dinesh Kumar & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2918/2019 & CRL.M.A. 11772/2019 DINESH KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Kochhar, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Tulli Ram. Ms. Seema Gola, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.703/2015, under Sections 323/354B/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Badarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 23rd May, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Tulli Ram, on the basis of...
State vs.om Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:12. 03.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:29. 05.2019 CRL.A.383/2012 STATE ..... Appellant Versus OM PRAKASH ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Ajit Singh, PS-Mehrauli : Mr. G.S. Sharma, Mr. V.K. Sharma and Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J1 The State has instituted the present appeal under section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) assailing the impugned judgment dated 14.02.2011, in Session Case No.47/08, arising out of FIR No.98/06, registered at Police Station Mehrauli; whereby the learned Trial Court has, acquitted the accused Om Prakash, the respondent herein, of the charges framed against him under section 302/363/376/201 Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) 1860...
Bamcef Cghs Ltd vs.m/s Hanuman Promoters & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h April, 2019 Date of Decision:29. h May, 2019 + O.M.P. 212/2011 & I.A. 2870/2019 (for delay) BAMCEF CGHS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Jain, Mr. Brijesh Yadav & Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates (M- 9811160427) M/S HANUMAN PROMOTERS & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Sharma & Mr. Nishank Tyagi, Advocates (M-9899950072) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGEMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed challenging the award dated 8th November, 2010 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator.2. The Delhi Development Authority allotted land to the... Petitioner Society- BAMCEF Group Housing Society, Rohini (hereinafter, Society) for construction of dwelling units for the members of the Society in the year 1984. The Society consists of members of the backward and minority community, belonging to the lower middle salaried class. The ...
Rajesh Kumar & Anr vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h May, 2019 RAJESH KUMAR & ANR + W.P.(C) 7518/2016 & CM APPL. 873/2019 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarana, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Ms. Shiva Pandey and Ms. Ritika Ganju, Advs. for R/DUSIB. Ms. Geeta Mehrotra, Adv. for DDA/R-4. % 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that, despite having applied for allocation of flats under the Residential Flat Registration Scheme for Slum Dwellers, 1985, of the DDA, on 23rd December, 1985 and 31st January, 1986, they have yet to be allotted any flats under the said Scheme.2. The issue in controversy is not res integra, as a similar grievance has been adjudicated by a coordinate Single Bench of this Court, vide judgment dated 7th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) 1615/2013 (Arvind Raval v. Union of India). The ...
Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam vs.employees State Insurance Corpor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~21 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:29. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5844/2019 & CM APPL254842019 UTTAR PRADESH RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM........ Petitioner Through Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Yadav, Mr. Jatin Parashar and Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Advocates versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.P. Mavi, Mr. Puneet Kumar Rastogi, Mr. Sadana, Advocates for the respondents along with Mr. Paramjit Singh, SSO(ESIC) Sidharth CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL254852019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5844/2019 3. The petitioner participated in a e-tender for repair and maintenance work of the ESIC Model Hospitals Basaidarpur and ESIC Model Hospital Rohini, Sector 15, New Delhi on 28.01.2019 and 03.04.2019. The tender pertaining to Rohini stands rejected, which has led ...
Sombir vs.staff Selection Commission & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~42 * + Date of Decision:29. 05.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6256/2019 SOMBIR Through: Mr. Anunaya Mehta and Mr. Akshay ........ Petitioner Deep Singhal, Advocates. Versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra and Mr. Yashaswi S.K.Choudhry, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.26788/2019 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.6256/2019 & CM No.26789/2019 1.2. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 25.2.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench in OA13802016.3. The petitioner had assailed the rejection of his candidature and his W.P.(C.) No.6256/2019 Page 1 of 5 being debarred for a period of three years by the respondent on the allegation that he had resorted to ...
Babita Bisht vs.dharmender Singh Bisht
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 456/2015 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2019 BABITA BISHT versus DHARMENDER SINGH BISHT ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Akshai Malik, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent : Mr. C.S. Bhandari with Mr. Devagya Kainth, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CRL.REV.P. 456/2015 & Crl.M.A.10428/2015 (stay) & Crl.M.A. 11133/2019 (directions) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 29.04.2015, whereby, the Trial Court has reduced the quantum of maintenance being given to the petitioner from 30% of the gross income of the respondent to 15% of gross salary.2. Parties were married on 07.05.2006 and separated on 15.10.2006. Subject application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed CRL.REV.P.456/2015 Page 1 of 7 on 29.11.2006.3. On 21.02.2008, order for grant of interim maintenance was passed and petitio...
In the Matter of Munjal Aviation pvt.ltd. (In Members‟vol. Liqn.) Vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~CP-31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No.15/ 2019 Date of decision:29. 05.2019 IN THE MATTER OF MUNJAL AVIATION PVT.LTD. (IN MEMBERSVOL. LIQN.) .... Petitioner Through Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Standing Counsel for the Official Liquidator % + CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator seeking for voluntary winding of M/s MUNJAL AVIATION PRIVATE LIMITED (in Members Voluntary Liquidation) (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act with the name Hero Aviation Private Limited with Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana on 22.04.2008 having Corporate Identity Number U62200DL2008PTC177022, the name of the said company was changed to Munjal Aviation Private Limited w.e.f 13.06.2011.3. The authorized share capital of the said company was Rs.22,50,00,0...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »