Judgment:
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1406/2019 RAHUL@LALA versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner
..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner
: Mr.Anil Basoya, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. SI Rishikesh, P.S.Ambedkar Nagar Mr.Arun Chaudhary, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM:-
"HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER2905.2019 Crl.M.A.11949/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 1406/2019 1.... Petitioner
seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.195/2019 under Sections
of the IPC registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi.
2. As per the FIR, the prosecutrix knew the family of the petitioner for last 2-3 years as they were neighbours. BAIL APPLN.1406/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. It is alleged that the prosecutrix is a divorcee having divorced her earlier husband in 2016. It is alleged that petitioner approached her and expressed her affection with her and thereafter he and his family promised that petitioner would marry the prosecutrix. Subsequently, it is alleged that they had physical relationship also which was established on the pretext of false promise to marry.
4. It is further alleged that during all religious functions the mother of the petitioner would treat her like her prospective daughter in law. However, subsequently, they started demanding money from the prosecutrix. It is alleged that the prosecutrix is also pregnant with the child of the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that the allegations clearly establish that the relationship was consensual and there is no allegation that petitioner ever used any force or made physical relations with the consent of the prosecutrix.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the complainant is being regularly approached by the petitioner or some person on behalf of the petitioner and being pressurized to settle the disputes by taking money.
7. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State who prays for time to file the status report. Let the same be filed on BAIL APPLN.1406/2019 Page 2 of 3 or before the next date of hearing.
8. 9. List on 13.09.2019. In the meantime, subject to petitioner joining investigation, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner till the next date of hearing.
10. At the request of learned APP, petitioner is directed to appear before the IO on 30.05.2019 at 4 PM, P.S. Ambedkar Nagar.
11. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly approach the prosecutrix or her family. The IO is directed to provide his personal mobile number to the prosecutrix so that she may contract the IO in case the need so arises.
12. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. MAY29 2019 rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J BAIL APPLN.1406/2019 Page 3 of 3