Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhir Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2212/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8831-8832/2019 CRL.M.C. 2213/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8833-8834/2019 CRL.M.C. 2214/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8835-8836/2019 CRL.M.C. 2215/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8837-8838/2019 CRL.M.C. 2216/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8839-8840/2019 CRL.M.C. 2217/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8841-8842/2019 CRL.M.C. 2218/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8843-8844/2019 CRL.M.C. 2219/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8845-8846/2019 CRL.M.C. 2220/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8847-8848/2019 SUDHIR KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the challenge to impugned order in these petitions is on identical grounds and so, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Crl.M.C. 2212/2019 & connecte...
Mahender Kumar Gupta vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 (i) + CRL.REV.P. 307/2017 & CRL.M.A. 6857/2017; 6858/2017 & 2128/2018 HAMENDRA KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aproov Malik & Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates (ii) CRL.REV.P. 600/2017 & CRL.M.A. 13095/2017 RAJA RAMAN SHANKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Ms. Vaibhavi Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gaur, Mr. Vivek Punia & Mr. Pulkit Jain, Advocates (iii) + CRL.M.C. 1977/2017 & CRL.M.A. 8124/2017 RAJESH WADHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Kohli & Mr. Raghav M., Advocates (iv) + CRL.M.C. 3149/2017 & CRL.M.As. 12999/2017 & 13000/2017 MAHENDER KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanveer A. Mir, (v) + CRL.M.C. 4048/2017 & Crl.M.As. 16267-16268/2017 Advocate Crl.Rev.P.307/2017 Crl.Rev.P.600/2017 Crl.M.C. 1977/2017 Crl.M.C. 3149/2017 Crl.M.C. 4048/2017 Crl.M.C. 1370/2017 Page 1 of 6 SURAJ PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Kohli & Mr. Raghav M., A...
Sushil Vadhera vs.election Commission of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 4417/2019, CM No.19675/2019 & 19676/2019 Date of Decision:26th April, 2019. IN THE MATTER OF: SUSHIL VADHERA .....Petitioner Through : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through : Mr. Rajeev Sharma and Mr.Abhishek Bhardwaj, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: A) Pass an appropriate orders(s) issuing the writ thereby the order dated 24.04.2019 of the respondent no.2 of rejecting the nomination paper of the petitioner from New Delhi Parliamentary Constituency be set aside and the petitioner be allowed to contest the General Election (Lok Sabha), 2019 from New Delhi, Parliamentary Constituency as a candidate of Bahujan Samaj Party and accepting the nomination paper. B. Any other relief which this Honble Court deems fit and proper, in the ...
Karan Madaan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2092/2017 KARAN MADAAN STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. Ms. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.181 of 2017 under Sections 354/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Inderpuri.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix along with her friend had gone to meet the uncle of the petitioner. When they entered the house, petitioner is alleged to have come out in an intoxicated state and assaulted her. It is alleged that he pushed her and hit her on her chest and abused her.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner BAIL APPLN. 2092/2017 Page 1 of 2 has been falsely implicated and there is an unexplained del...
Harsh Brar vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2202/2019 HARSH BRAR Through: Mr. Kishan Singh Chauhan, .....Petitioner Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.M.S. Oberoi, Additioanl Public Prosecutor with SI Shiv Raj Mr. Vikrant Choudhary, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.521/2015, under Sections 354(A)/506 of IPC & 8 POCSO (The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012) registered at Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 15th April, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that petitioner is a student and the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been iden...
Nisha Gupta & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2203/2019 NISHA GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.N. Dubey, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sandeep... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 8806/2019 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.A. 8805/2019 (stay) Dismissed as infructuous. CRL.M.C. 2203/2019 Quashing of FIR No.136/2013 and chargesheet under Sections 323/354/458/506/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Begum Pur, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 9th April, 2019 of respondents No.2 & 3 and on the ground that the misunderstanding Crl.M.C.2203/2019 Page 1 of 3 which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits ...
Jitender Kumar Sethi & Anr vs.guatam Saluja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
$~43 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26. 04.2019 FAO1822019 and C.M. Appl. No.19235-37/2019 JITENDER KUMAR SETHI & ANR + CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH GUATAM SALUJA versus ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Abhimanyu & Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocates ..... Respondent Through: Dr. (Maj.) J.C. Vashishta, Mr. Madan Lal & Ms. Yashika Sood, Advocates JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) CAVEAT No.433/2019 1. Since the respondent has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 19236/2019 (for exemption) 2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 19237/2019 (for delay) 3. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 182 days in filing the appeal. FAO1822019 Page 1 of 9 4. For the reasons stated in the application and no objection given by learned counsel for the respondent, the delay of 182 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. FAO1822019 & CM APPL. 19235/2019 (for stay) 5...
Sudhir Kumar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2212/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8831-8832/2019 CRL.M.C. 2213/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8833-8834/2019 CRL.M.C. 2214/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8835-8836/2019 CRL.M.C. 2215/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8837-8838/2019 CRL.M.C. 2216/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8839-8840/2019 CRL.M.C. 2217/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8841-8842/2019 CRL.M.C. 2218/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8843-8844/2019 CRL.M.C. 2219/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8845-8846/2019 CRL.M.C. 2220/2019 & CRL.M.As. 8847-8848/2019 SUDHIR KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the challenge to impugned order in these petitions is on identical grounds and so, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Crl.M.C. 2212/2019 & connecte...
Suraj Prakash vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 26, 2019 (i) + CRL.REV.P. 307/2017 & CRL.M.A. 6857/2017; 6858/2017 & 2128/2018 HAMENDRA KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aproov Malik & Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates (ii) CRL.REV.P. 600/2017 & CRL.M.A. 13095/2017 RAJA RAMAN SHANKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Ms. Vaibhavi Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gaur, Mr. Vivek Punia & Mr. Pulkit Jain, Advocates (iii) + CRL.M.C. 1977/2017 & CRL.M.A. 8124/2017 RAJESH WADHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Kohli & Mr. Raghav M., Advocates (iv) + CRL.M.C. 3149/2017 & CRL.M.As. 12999/2017 & 13000/2017 MAHENDER KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanveer A. Mir, (v) + CRL.M.C. 4048/2017 & Crl.M.As. 16267-16268/2017 Advocate Crl.Rev.P.307/2017 Crl.Rev.P.600/2017 Crl.M.C. 1977/2017 Crl.M.C. 3149/2017 Crl.M.C. 4048/2017 Crl.M.C. 1370/2017 Page 1 of 6 SURAJ PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Kohli & Mr. Raghav M., A...
Bharat Batra & Ors. Vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"26th April, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3037/2016 BHARAT BATRA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Viveck Agarwal, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with Insp. Asha, PS CWC Nanak Pura Mr. Sanjeev Sahay and Ms.Jhun Jhun Sarkar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 08.02.2011 in New Delhi. No child took birth out of the said wedlock. On account statedly of temperamental differences, the parties separated from each other in January 2012. The second respondent lodging first information report (FIR) no.149/2012 with police station CAW Cell, Nanak Pura, New Delhi on 22.10.2012, alleging offences punishable under Section 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »