Karan Madaan vs.state

Karan Madaan vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 26, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1222822

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1222822
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Apr 26, 2019
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karan Madaan

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....when they entered the house, petitioner is alleged to have come out in an intoxicated state and assaulted her. it is alleged that he pushed her and hit her on her chest and abused her.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner bail appln. 2092/2017 page 1 of 2 has been falsely implicated and there is an unexplained delay for over five months in lodging the complaint.4. by order dated 17.10.2017, petitioner was granted interim protection subject to joining of the investigation.5. learned addl. pp submits that petitioner has joined the investigation. investigation is complete and there is no further requirement of the petitioner to join the investigation.6. without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view of the totality of the facts and circumstances, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.7. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioner on bail on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioner shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master.8. 9. sanjeev sachdeva, j april26 2019/‘rs’ bail appln. 2092/2017 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

26. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2092/2017 KARAN MADAAN STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. Ms. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State For the Respondent: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.181 of 2017 under Sections 354/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Inderpuri.

2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix along with her friend had gone to meet the uncle of the petitioner. When they entered the house, petitioner is alleged to have come out in an intoxicated state and assaulted her. It is alleged that he pushed her and hit her on her chest and abused her.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner BAIL APPLN. 2092/2017 Page 1 of 2 has been falsely implicated and there is an unexplained delay for over five months in lodging the complaint.

4. By order dated 17.10.2017, petitioner was granted interim protection subject to joining of the investigation.

5. Learned Addl. PP submits that petitioner has joined the investigation. Investigation is complete and there is no further requirement of the petitioner to join the investigation.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view of the totality of the facts and circumstances, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

8. 9. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J APRIL26 2019/‘rs’ BAIL APPLN. 2092/2017 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Karan Madaan vs State Same Subject Criminal