Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Centrum Financial Services Limited vs.trimax It Infrastructure and Ser ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t April, 2019 CS(COMM) 1249/2018, IA No.16076/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.4758/2019 (u/O XII R-6 CPC) & IA No.4759/2019 (u/S92r/w S-151 CPC) CENTRUM FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Ms. Chaitanya Puri, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar & Mr. Divyanshu Bhandari, Advs. Versus TRIMAX IT INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES LTD. AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.K. Goyal & Mr. A.K. Goyal, Advs. for D-1,2,3&5. Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Mr. Sonal Kumar Singh & Mr. Rajat Dasgupta, Advs. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff has instituted this suit against defendants no.1 to 5 viz.1. (i) Trimax IT Infrastructure & Services Ltd., (ii) Surya Prakash Madrecha, (iii) Chandra Prakash Mandrecha, (iv) ITI Ltd., and, (v) Standard Fiscal Markets Pvt. Ltd., for (a) recovery of Rs.11,27,58,496/- with interest pendente lite and future, (b) rendition of accounts, (c) mandatory inju...
Shantnu Rai vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2160/2018 SHANTNU RAI STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Vinay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Mamta, P.S.Dabri Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Adv. complainant. for the CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in F.I.R No.391/2018, under Sections 323/3IPC & 8 of POCSO Act, P.S.Dabri.2.... Petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 26.09.2018 subject to joining investigation. Learned APP submits that investigation is complete, charge sheet has already been filed.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall approach the Trial Court for consideration of his regular bail. BAIL APPLN.2160/2018 Page 1 of 2 4. In view of the fact that charge sheet has been...
M/S n.k. Kapur & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Pico Deepali Overlays Consortium
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~5 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2114/2013 M/S N.K. KAPUR & CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.K.K.Bhuchar, Advocate. Versus M/S PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM ..... Defendant Date of Decision:01. t April, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs.1,92,70,252.00/- and pendente lite and future interest @ 18% per annum. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that: a. a decree in the sum of Rs.1,92,70,252.00 along with future interest @18% per annum from the date of the suit till realization be passed in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant. b. cost of the present suit be also award in favour of the Page 1 of 5 CS(OS) 2114/2013 2.3. Plaintiff and against the Defendant. c. Pass such other or further order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in facts and circum...
Mukesh Gupta vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Pronounced on: April 01, 2019 (i) + CRL.A. 526/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1347/2017 SURESH KUMAR LAKRA Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Tiwari & Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 523/2016 PIYUSH GOEL @ PIYUSH GOYAL (IN CUSTODY) Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 520/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1346/2017 JAIBIR SINGH SEHRAWAT @ JAIBIR SHERAWAT (iv) + CRL.A. 499/2016 MUKESH GUPTA Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Through: Mr. Ganesh Khanna & Dr. Sushil Gupta, Advocates (v) + CRL.A. 495/2016 & Crl.M.(B) 257/2017 UMESH PARASHAR Crl.A.526/2016 Crl.A.523/2016 Crl.A.520/2016 Crl.A.499/2016 Crl.A.495/2016 Crl.A.480/2016 Page 1 of 29 1. Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate (vi) CRL.A. 480/2016 & Crl.M.A. 15869/2016 VIRENDER PAL Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Versus Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate .... Appellant...
Const. Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~1 to 4 & 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 873/2018 CONST. RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra & Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law & Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 2407/2018 CONST. RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Ms. Santwana, Advocates Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law & Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF * + + + W.P.(C) 2427/2018 CONST. MUKESH KUMAR BAJIYA Through Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr. Panel counsel , Mr. R.M.Tripathi, Mr. Abhimanyu, W.P.(C) 873/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + % Mr. Abhishek Khanna & Mr. Soumaya Karmakar, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC...
Manju Jain & Anr vs.bank of Baroda & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 04.2019 W.P.(C) 8819/2014 & C.M. No.52616/2018 MANJU JAIN & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sanjiv Kakra, Adv. with Mr.Sumehar Bajaj, Adv. with petitioner no.2 in person. versus BANK OF BARODA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Arun Aggarwal, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners assail the order dated 06.08.2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (DRAT) in Appeal No.16/2011, which was filed by the petitioners impugning the order dated 22.12.2010 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I (DRT) in Appeal Nos.32/2006 and 08/2008. By way of the aforesaid order dated 22.12.2010, the DRT had dismissed the petitioners appeals challenging the rejection by the Recovery Officer of their objections to the attachment of the proper...
National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Jsc Centrodorstroy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t April, 2019 + O.M.P. 219/2011 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Padma Priya & Mr. Dhruv Nayar, Advocates (M-9910531145) versus M/S JSC CENTRODORSTROY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma & Mr. Konika Mitra, Advocates (M-9911901102) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 has been filed challenging 1. award dated 30th June, 2010 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal. The National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter, NHAI) had awarded works for Four Laning and Strengthening of Existing Two Lane Section between Km.38 and Km. 115 on NH-2 in the State of UP, Construction Package II-C vide contract dated 12th March, 2001 bearing No.TNHP/25 to M/s JSC Centrodorstroy (hereinafter, Contractor). The total value of the contract was over Rs.295.53 crores. One of the claims that was raised by the Contractor was in respe...
Sardar Balbir Singh vs.sukhwant Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:20. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:1. t April, 2019 + RC.REV. 320/2016 & CM APPL No.22898/2016 SARDAR MAHINDER SINGH Through : Mr.S.P.Singh Choudhari ........ Petitioner and Mr.Y.R. Sharma, Advocates. versus SUKHWANT KAUR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Pawan K Bahl and Mr.Bharat Pankaj, Advocates with respondent in person. + RC.REV. 321/2016 & CM APPL No.22901/2016 SARDAR BALBIR SINGH Through : Mr.S.P.Singh Choudhari ........ Petitioner and Mr.Y.R. Sharma, Advocates. versus SUKHWANT KAUR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Pawan K Bahl and Mr.Bharat Pankaj, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. These revision petitions are filed for setting aside of the order dated 26.10.2015 passed by the learned Rent Controller (East), RC.REV No.320/2016 and 321/2016 Page 1 of 9 Karkardooma, Delhi whereby the applications for leave to defend of the petitioners in both the eviction petitions we...
Virender Pal vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Pronounced on: April 01, 2019 (i) + CRL.A. 526/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1347/2017 SURESH KUMAR LAKRA Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Tiwari & Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 523/2016 PIYUSH GOEL @ PIYUSH GOYAL (IN CUSTODY) Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 520/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1346/2017 JAIBIR SINGH SEHRAWAT @ JAIBIR SHERAWAT (iv) + CRL.A. 499/2016 MUKESH GUPTA Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Through: Mr. Ganesh Khanna & Dr. Sushil Gupta, Advocates (v) + CRL.A. 495/2016 & Crl.M.(B) 257/2017 UMESH PARASHAR Crl.A.526/2016 Crl.A.523/2016 Crl.A.520/2016 Crl.A.499/2016 Crl.A.495/2016 Crl.A.480/2016 Page 1 of 29 1. Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate (vi) CRL.A. 480/2016 & Crl.M.A. 15869/2016 VIRENDER PAL Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Versus Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate .... Appellant...
Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs.bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 281/2015 DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD. ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :1. t April, 2019 Through: Mr.Prasenjit Keswani, Mr.Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Advs. versus BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.S.Ray, Mr.Vaibhav Gulia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 30.12.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement for supply of indigenous anhydrous ethanol in State of Haryana dated 11.10.2010 executed between the parties.2. The primary dispute between the parties is on the interpretation and effect of Clause 5 of the Agreement, which is reproduced hereinunder: 5. TAKE OR PAY / SUPPLY OR PAY: O.M.P. No.281/...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »