Shantnu Rai vs.state

Shantnu Rai vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 01, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1222344

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1222344
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Apr 01, 2019
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shantnu Rai

Respondent

State

Excerpt

$~7 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + judgment delivered on:01. 04.2019 bail appln. 2160/2018 shantnu rai state versus ........ petitioner ..... respondent advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioner : mr.vinay kumar sharma, advocate. for the respondent: mr. hirein sharma, app for the state with asi mamta, p.s.dabri mr. sudhir kumar sharma, adv. complainant. for the coram:-"hon’ble mr justice sanjeev sachdeva judgment sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) 1.... petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in f.i.r no.391/2018, under sections 323/3ipc & 8 of pocso act, p.s.dabri.2.... petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 26.09.2018 subject to joining investigation. learned app submits that investigation is complete, charge sheet has already been filed.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall approach the trial court for consideration of his regular bail. bail appln.2160/2018 page 1 of 2 4. in view of the fact that charge sheet has been filed, petitioner is permitted to approach the trial court for grant of regular bail. subject to petitioner filing an application with the trial court within one week from today, the interim protection granted to the petitioner by order dated 26.09.2018 shall continue till the disposal of the application filed by the petitioner before the trial court for grant of bail.5. it is clarified that the trial court shall consider the bail application on its own merits without being influenced by any order passed by this court in these proceedings. petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. order dasti under signatures of the court master.6. 7. april01 2019 rk sanjeev sachdeva, j bail appln.2160/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

01. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2160/2018 SHANTNU RAI STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr.Vinay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Mamta, P.S.Dabri Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Adv. complainant. for the CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in F.I.R No.391/2018, under Sections 323/3
IPC & 8 of POCSO Act, P.S.Dabri.

2.... Petitioner

was granted interim protection by order dated 26.09.2018 subject to joining investigation. Learned APP submits that investigation is complete, charge sheet has already been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall approach the Trial Court for consideration of his regular bail. BAIL APPLN.2160/2018 Page 1 of 2 4. In view of the fact that charge sheet has been filed, petitioner is permitted to approach the Trial Court for grant of regular bail. Subject to petitioner filing an application with the Trial Court within one week from today, the interim protection granted to the petitioner by order dated 26.09.2018 shall continue till the disposal of the application filed by the petitioner before the Trial Court for grant of bail.

5. It is clarified that the Trial Court shall consider the bail application on its own merits without being influenced by any order passed by this Court in these proceedings. Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

6. 7. APRIL01 2019 rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J BAIL APPLN.2160/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Shantnu Rai vs State Same Subject Criminal