Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohit Sharma& Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~18 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"7th March, 2019 Crl.M.C. 2941/2018 & Crl.M.A. 10411/2018 MOHIT SHARMA& ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gajender Singh, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir & Mr. Apurv, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies on 01.05.2013. On 29.03.2014, she lodged first information report (FIR) No.205/2014 with police station Dwarka North alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/323/341/352/5of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second petitioner) and his mother (third petitioner). On conclusion of the investigation, police filed report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on which cognizance...
Pravez & Anr vs.state (Gnct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1262/2019 Date of Order: March 07, 2019 PRAVEZ & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Mr. Priyankar Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Prabhakaran Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 4955/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1262/2019 Quashing of FIR No.17/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Dabri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 15th December, 2018 reached between the parties. Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved, as today she has received CRL.M.C. 1262/2019 Page 1 of 3 an amount o...
Union Public Service Commission vs.dr. Rjr Kasibhatla and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5954/2017 & C.M. No.24729/2017, C.M. No.3676/2018 Date of Decision:07. 03.2019 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Through: Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent DR. R J R KASIBHATLA AND ANR CORAM: Through: Mr.Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Sameer Sinha, Mr.Gaurav Mahajan, Mr.Vinay Prakash Singh, Mr.Aditya and Mr.Devesh Kumar, Adv for respondent no.1 Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Mukesh Kumar Tiwari and Mr.Abhishek Rana, Advocates for respondent no.2/UOI $~09. * + % HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The UPSC assails the order dated 14.3.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, (The Tribunal) in O.A. No.693/2014. The Tribunal has allowed the said application preferred by the respondent and directed the USPC to recommend the candidature of the respondent for appointment to the post of Additional Legal Adviser (ALA) in the Department of Legal Affair...
Amod Kumar Verma vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 6343/2018 AMOD KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kailash Gohani, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Praveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.432/2016, under Section 354 IPC, registered at police station Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 3rd October, 2018 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Praveen Kumar on the basis of identity ...
Monu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 197/2019 MONU STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. J.K. Bhelloriya with Mr. R.K. Rathore, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Naresh Kumar, PS Chhawla Ms. Kanika, Advocate for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.477/2018 under Sections 498A/3IPC, Police Station Chhawla.2.... Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. The allegations of the complainant are that the petitioner and his family have been harassing the complainant for dowry. It is alleged that on 15.11.2018 when the complainant was at her house, there was a fight between her and her mother-in-law and sisters-in-law, whereby, it is alleged that the mother-in-law and sisters-in-law assaulted her and thereafter the...
All Services Global Pvt Limited vs.resident Commissioner Government of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 03.2019 ARB.P. 759/2018 ALL SERVICES GLOBAL PVT LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Advocate. versus RESIDENT COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH Through: Mr. V.K. Shukla with Mr. Vishal ..... Respondent Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act).2. Notice in this petition was issued on 03.10.2018. The respondent entered appearance on 09.01.2019.3. Since then, I am told that respondent has filed a reply, though the same is not on record.4. In view of the fact that this is a petition filed under Section 11 of the 1996 Act, to my mind, no further time needs to be given for bringing the reply on record. 4.1 A photocopy of the reply, however, has been placed before me which has been examined by me.5. I have also heard the counsel for the respon...
International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution vs.union of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:07th March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2236/2019, CM Nos. 10489/2019 & 10490/2019 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dushyant Dave and Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advs. with Mr. R.K. Rathore, Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Ms. Ramya Kutty, Mr. Sohel Rishabh and Mr. Tushar Jalan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. Harshul Choudhary, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Mr. Sahil Sood, Advs. with Mr. Rajeev Mani, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Law & Justice CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.10489/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2236/2019, CM No.10490/2019 (for stay) Issue notice to the respondents to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC accepts...
Savita Bansal & Ors. Vs.narender Barmecha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~20&21 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :07. 03.2019 + CONT.CAS(C) 357/2018 SAVITA BANSAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Shalini Kapoor with Mr. Dikshant Khanna and Ms. Bindita Chaturveid, Advocates versus NARENDER BARMECHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Debmalya Banerjee, Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Kartik and Mr. Avival Bhatnagar Kapoor, Advocates for Respondent nos. 1,3 to 5 Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Advocate for Respondent no.2 AND + CONT.CAS(C) 644/2018 SAVITA BANSAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Shalini Kapoor with Mr. Dikshant Khanna and Ms. Bindita Chaturveid, Advocates versus NARENDRA BARMECHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Debmalya Banerjee, Mr. CONT.CAS.357/2018 & 644/2018 Page 1 of 3 Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar and Mr. Avival Kapoor, for Advocates Respondent nos. 1,3 to 5 Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Advocate for Respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0703.2019 It is submitted by Ms. Sh...
Akm Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ahluwalia Contract (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 2/2016 & IA3102016 AKM ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :7. h March, 2019 Through: Mr.S.K.Dubey, Mr.Udit Malik, Mr.Rajmangal Kumar, Advs. versus AHLUWALIA CONTRACT (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Bhagat, Mr.Ritik Malik, Mr.Akhil Suri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 17.09.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement dated 07.02.2006 by which the petitioner had awarded the Civil and Structural Work for construction of a Mall/Multiplex, Five Star Hotel at Ferozpur Road, Ludhiana (Punjab) in favour of the respondent.2. The challenge to the Award is confined only to the rejection of the counter claim of the petitioner by t...
Radico Khaitan Ltd. Vs.m/s. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 724/2018 RADICO KHAITAN LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ishani Chandra, Mr. Sagar Chandra, Mr. Ankit Rastogi and Ms. Srijan Uppal, Advocates. versus M/S. DEVANS MODERN BREWERIES LTD. ..... Defendant Through:Mr. S.K. Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman and Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri, Advocates Reserved on :11. h February, 2019 Date of Decision:07. h March, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J I.As. 3483/2018, 4354/2018 1. The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, delivery up, rendition of accounts, damages etc. The prayer clause in I.A. 3483/2018 is reproduced hereinbelow:-"CS (COMM) 724/2018 Page 1 of 29 26. In these circumstances it is respectfully prayed before that this Honble Court may be pleased to pass an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, proprie...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »