Monu vs.state

Monu vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 07, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1221852

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1221852
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Mar 07, 2019
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Monu

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....bail appln. 197/2019 page 1 of 3 mother-in-law and her sister along with one of the sisters-in-law held her and mother-in-law poured oil on her and another sister-in-law set fire to her. the prosecutrix sustained 40% injuries.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. he submits that admittedly as per the statement of the prosecutrix, the petitioner was not present in the house when the alleged incident happened.4. learned app for the state submits that the investigation is nearly complete and charge sheet is in the process of finalization for being filed in court.5.... petitioner has been in custody since 21.12.2018.6. without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner was not alleged to be present in the house at the time when the incident of burning is alleged to have taken place, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.7. accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, petitioner shall be released on bail if not required in any other case.... petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. bail appln. 197/2019 page 2 of 3 8.9. petition is allowed in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j march07 2019 st bail appln. 197/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

07. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 197/2019 MONU STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. J.K. Bhelloriya with Mr. R.K. Rathore, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Naresh Kumar, PS Chhawla Ms. Kanika, Advocate for the complainant. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks regular bail in FIR No.477/2018 under Sections 498A/3
IPC, Police Station Chhawla.

2.... Petitioner

is the husband of the complainant. The allegations of the complainant are that the petitioner and his family have been harassing the complainant for dowry. It is alleged that on 15.11.2018 when the complainant was at her house, there was a fight between her and her mother-in-law and sisters-in-law, whereby, it is alleged that the mother-in-law and sisters-in-law assaulted her and thereafter the BAIL APPLN. 197/2019 Page 1 of 3 mother-in-law and her sister along with one of the sisters-in-law held her and mother-in-law poured oil on her and another sister-in-law set fire to her. The prosecutrix sustained 40% injuries.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that admittedly as per the statement of the prosecutrix, the petitioner was not present in the house when the alleged incident happened.

4. Learned APP for the State submits that the investigation is nearly complete and charge sheet is in the process of finalization for being filed in Court.

5.... Petitioner

has been in custody since 21.12.2018.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner was not alleged to be present in the house at the time when the incident of burning is alleged to have taken place, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.

7. Accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, petitioner shall be released on bail if not required in any other case.... Petitioner

shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. BAIL APPLN. 197/2019 Page 2 of 3 8.

9. Petition is allowed in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MARCH07 2019 st BAIL APPLN. 197/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Monu vs State Same Subject Criminal