Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Leayan Global Pvt Ltd vs.bata India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:18. 03.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 58/2019 LEAYAN GLOBAL PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar & Mr. Somnath D.C., Advocates versus BATA INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Ms. Anushka & Mr. Anmol, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 12756/2019 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 58/2019 & CM APPL. 12755/2019 3. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 27.02.2019 passed on an application filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of CPC and an order dated 13.03.2019 passed on an application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC. FAO (OS) (COMM) No.58/2019 Page 1 of 4 4. Mr. Bansal, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the respondent has concealed material facts fr...
State vs.nadeem
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 18th March, 2019 CRL. L.P. 209/2019 & CM APPL. NO.5748/2019 (under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for exemption) STATE ..Petitioner versus NADEEM ..Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with SI Bijender Singh, PS I. P. Estate. : None For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 5747/2019 (by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the accompanying petition) 1. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, instituted on behalf of the applicant/State, seeks condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the accompanying leave petition.2. Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/State and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 13 days in filing the accompanying peti...
Pooja Singh & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h December, 2018 Decided on:18. h March, 2019 + W.P. (C) No.1997 of 2018 with CM Nos. 8210-8211 of 2018 POOJA SINGH & ANR. Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Saluja and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing counsel for BSES/RPL with Mr. Aman Vidyarthi, Ms.Anju Thomas & Ms.Priyansha Indra, Advocates. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for UOI. Ms.Urvi Mohan Advocate for Mr.Sanjay Ghose, ASC GNCTD. + POOJA SINGH & ANR. ..Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Saluja and Mr. Sangam CONT. CAS(C) No.455/2018 Kumar, Advocates. versus R.K.KULSHRESTHA & ANR. ..Respondents W.P. (C) No.1997/2018 & CONT. CAS(C) No.455/2018 Page 1 of 9 Through: Mr. Sunil Femandes, Standing counsel for BSES/RPL with Mr. Aman Vidyarthi, Ms.Anju Thomas & Ms.Priyansha Indra, Advocates. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for UOI. Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocate...
Gopal Ji Gupta vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 7644/2017, CM No.31609/2017 GOPAL JI GUPTA Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Adv. with Mr. Amit Jain, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. with ..... Respondent Ms. Santwana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the Honble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or direction to the... RESPONDENTS. a) To set aside the Communication dated 15.07.2015 passed by the Ld. Registrar of the Trade marks dismissing the Form TM-12 of in respect of registration No.473696 in class 25; the... Petitioner To allow filing of the TM-12 in respect of b) registration No.473696 in class 25; To allow the Form-12 so filed by... Petitioner and c) issue renewal Certificate to the... Petitioner in ...
Deepak Goyal vs.state, Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1496/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5920/2019 DEEPAK GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Nayar and Ms. Deeksha Nayyar, Advocates Versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sanjay Kumar Mr. Ratna Appnender, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.64/2018, under Sections 354/354D/506/509 of IPC registered at police station Barakhamba Road, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 1st February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI...
Banarsi Lal Gupta vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3225/2016 Decided on:18. h March, 2019 BANARSI LAL GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Narang, Mr. Siddharth Handa, Mr. Ketan Goel & Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Upon consideration of the report (cancellation report) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) dated 05.02.2013, submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.32/2008 of police station Pahar Ganj, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) took cognizance of offence punishable under Section 431 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and summoned M/s B L Gupta Construction Pvt. Ltd. along with two of its directors including the petitioner (Managing Director) and his wife Aruna Gupta (Director) as accused.2. The said two persons including the petitioner assai...
Anil Gulati vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 131/2019 ANIL GULATI STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Bhupender, P.S.Rohini South. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.227/2018 under Sections 498A/406/509/354/3IPC, Police Station South Rohini. After investigation, Section 377 has been added.2. The petitioner is the Nandoi i.e. the husband of the sister of the husband of the complainant. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner used to eye the complainant and also used to misbehave with her. It is alleged that he had touched her inappropriately few times. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has 3. BAIL APPLN.131/2019 Page 1 of 2 bee...
Anil Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :31. 01.2019 Date of Decision:18. 03.2019 + CRL.A. 668/2003 ANIL SHARMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Mr. Hemant Gulati and Ms. Anshika Sethi, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgement dated 19.07.2003, arising out of FIR No.874/1998, under Section 302 IPC registered at Police Station Dabri and the order on sentence dated 19.07.2003, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in case he defaulted on payment of the fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months in consequence thereof. The two co-accused, namely Hans Raj and Sudershan, who faced trial along with the appellant, were however acquitted by the trial court. Crl.A.668/2003 P...
Sahil & Anr vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1455/2019 SAHIL & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramnit Singh, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Bharat Lal Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey & Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.190/2013, under Sections 186/353/3of IPC registered at police station Hauz Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 2nd March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Bharat Lal on the basis of identity...
Deepak Kumar & Ors vs.manoj Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:18. 03.2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 54/2019 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. J.N. Singh & Mr. Santosh Sahu, Advocates versus MANOJ GUPTA Through: In person ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 11106/2019 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 11107/2019 3. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in filing the appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 18 days in filing the appeal is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. FAO (OS) (COMM) No.54/2019 Page 1 of 13 FAO(OS) (COMM) 54/2019 6. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 04.12.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which a petition bearing OMP (COMM) No.50/2017 under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act,...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »