Anil Gulati vs.state

Anil Gulati vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 18, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1222082

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1222082
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Mar 18, 2019
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Gulati

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....the petitioner has 3. bail appln.131/2019 page 1 of 2 been falsely implicated. he submits that the subject fir is an offshoot of a matrimonial dispute and all the family members have been implicated. he submits that the petitioner is a respectable person having family and his children are also married. learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not residing in the matrimonial house of the prosecutrix.4. on 18.01.2019 petitioner was granted interim protection subject to joining investigation. learned app under instructions submits that petitioner has joined investigation and investigation qua the role of the petitioner is complete, however, further investigation is still on.5. without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances, i am satisfied that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the investigation, trial or the prosecution witnesses.6. 7. petition is allowed in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j march18 2019/rk bail appln.131/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

18. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 131/2019 ANIL GULATI STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr.Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Bhupender, P.S.Rohini South. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.227/2018 under Sections 498A/406/509/354/3
IPC, Police Station South Rohini. After investigation, Section 377 has been added.

2. The petitioner is the Nandoi i.e. the husband of the sister of the husband of the complainant. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner used to eye the complainant and also used to misbehave with her. It is alleged that he had touched her inappropriately few times. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has 3. BAIL APPLN.131/2019 Page 1 of 2 been falsely implicated. He submits that the subject FIR is an offshoot of a matrimonial dispute and all the family members have been implicated. He submits that the petitioner is a respectable person having family and his children are also married. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not residing in the matrimonial house of the prosecutrix.

4. On 18.01.2019 petitioner was granted interim protection subject to joining investigation. Learned APP under instructions submits that petitioner has joined investigation and investigation qua the role of the petitioner is complete, however, further investigation is still on.

5. Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances, I am satisfied that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

shall not do anything which may prejudice either the investigation, trial or the prosecution witnesses.

6. 7. Petition is allowed in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MARCH18 2019/rk BAIL APPLN.131/2019 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Anil Gulati vs State Same Subject Criminal