Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Varsha vs.the State (n.c.t. Of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 1502/2018 VARSHA versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. M.K.Perwez, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Sandeep Singh, PS DIU/RD. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.25/2018 under Sections 354/354(A)/379/506/3of the IPC, Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant who is an Advocate had appeared before the mediation centre, representing her client, who had brought his children for the purpose of mediation. It is alleged that at the time of the mediation proceedings, the wife of her client along with her associates including the petitioner tried to snatch the children and she when tried to prevent the same, was assaulted...
Kanchan Bhattacharya and Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1440/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5758/2019 KANCHAN BHATTACHARYA AND ORS Through: Mr. Dhananjai Rana, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosectuor with SI Sonu Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 5758A /2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1440/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5758/2019 Quashing of FIR No.723/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Seemapuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding cum Settlement of 27th February, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sonu on the basis of identity proof pr...
Dinesh Chand vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A. 3& Crl.M. (B)4Judgment reserved on :26.04.2018 Date of decision :18. 03.2019 DINESH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate for DHCLSC. versus STATE (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyan Puri.. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant Dinesh Chand son of Sh. Moti Lal vide the present criminal appeal i.e. CRL.A.3assails the impugned judgment dated 05.01.2018 of the learned ASJ-01-cum-Presiding Officer-Special Court, East in Sessions Case No.11in relation to FIR No.669/13, PS Kalyan Puri, vide which he was convicted for commission of offences punishable under Sectionand Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The appellant has also assailed the impugned order on sentence dated 09.01.2018 of the said learned Trial Court whereby the convict i.e. the appellant herein...
Ram Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 596/2019 RAM SINGH versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajat Wadhwa with Ms. Urvashi Barman, Ms. Jaspreet Kaur and Mr. Ashish Vadra, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Amit Kumar, PS Connaught Place. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.207/2016 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC, Police Station Connaught Place.2. Subject FIR was registered on a complaint made by the Corporation Bank. The allegations in the FIR are that a cheque was given for the purposes of RTGS transfer of Rs.27,20,000/- to the account of M/s. S.N. Trading. RTGS was given effect to and the amount was transferred. Subsequently, another cheque was received along with a request for transfer of Rs.29,90,0...
Urmila vs.sushma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18.03.2019 % MACT APP. 917/2017 & CM No.37744/2017 URMILA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Saurabh Upadhyay, Mr.Vipul Sharma and Ms.Hardika Kalia, Advocates. versus SUSHMA & ORS. CORAM: .....Respondents Through: Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the instant appeal, the appellant assails the finding of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-02 (North) in short 'the Tribunal' rendered in its judgment-award dated 23.08.2017, whereunder, the liability to pay compensation to the motor accident victim (s) inter alia has come to be fixed upon him, being the registered owner of the offending vehicle. Concisely, the facts relevant to the appeal are that as on the date of 2. occurrence of the incident of accident on 11.08.2006, when the accident occurred in which the motor cycle bearing registration No.DL3 T9655in MAC Appeal No.917-2017 Page 1 of 7 short 'the offending veh...
Rajesh Vinayak vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1443/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5761/2019 RAJESH VINAYAK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Kamlesh Kumar. Mr. Anuj Pal, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.166/2018, under Sections 354A/509 of IPC registered at police station D.B.G. Road, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 6th March, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Kamlesh Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced ...
Sh. Apaar Bansal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2019 % + BAIL APPLN. 3028/2018 SH. APAAR BANSAL versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.R.D.Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the Respondent: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Jitender, P.S.K.N.Katju Marg. Mr.Sumit Chaudhary, Adv.for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.388/2017 under Sections 498A/406/34/354A/377 IPG, Police Station K.N. Katju Marg.2.... Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. On 20.12.2018 parties had sought reference to mediation.... Petitioner was granted interim protection subject to joining investigation and also attending mediation. Parties have arrived at a settlement and Settlement Agreement 3. BAIL APPLN.3028/2018 Page 1 of 2 dated 16.03.2019 has been executed. Learned counsel for the parties submits t...
Prashant Sareen vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 18, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1489/2019 & CRL.M.A. 5889-90/2019 PRASHANT SAREEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind K.Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Agarwal, Mr. Sameer Kumar and Ms. Nidhi Sahay, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with assisting counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of notices of 20th July, 2017 and 6th March, 2019 issued by third respondent requiring petitioner, who is resident of Delhi, to appear before third respondent in Kolkata in relation to investigation of FIR No.119/17, under Sections 370(50)/420/417/468/120B, registered at police station Kotwali, Kolkata is sought in this petition. Learned senior counsel for petitioner points out that Section 160 of Cr.P.C. requires attendance of such persons who reside within the...
Pratap Narain Verma vs.bharat Bhushan Gupta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~12 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 961/2018 & CM APPL. 33609/2018 Date of Decision:18. 03.2019 PRATAP NARAIN VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Khemka, Mr. Yogesh Swroop, Mr. Rishi Sehgal & Mr. Daksh Rathore, Advocates. versus BHARAT BHUSHAN GUPTA & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Surendra Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ORDER (ORAL) 1. No notice of the petition is indicated to have been issued to the respondent no.2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner and on behalf of the respondent no.1 that the respondent no.2 is ex parte before the learned Trial Court. No notice of the present petition is thus, being issued to the respondent no.2. CM(M) 961/2018 Page 1 of 24 2. The petitioner assails the impugned order dated 11.07.2018 of the learned Trial Court of the Civil Judge, South West Dwarka in CS SCJ No.427419/16, vide which an application under Order VI Rule 11 of the CPC filed on b...
Preetam Saini vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 653/2019 PREETAM SAINI versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Kashyap, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Sandeep, Crime Branch. Mr. Chetan Anand with Mr. Akash Srivastava, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner seeks interim bail for the treatment of his mother in FIR No.219/2017 under Sections 3IPC, Police Station New Friends Colony.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother requires to be admitted for investigation at AIIMS and investigation is to take place on 25.03.2019 and she has to be admitted one day before the said date. BAIL APPLN.653/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial court has permitted petitioner to be taken to AIIMS in...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »