Preetam Saini vs.state

Preetam Saini vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 18, 2019

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1222084

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1222084
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Mar 18, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Preetam Saini

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....after hearing learned app for the state as well as learned counsel appearing for the complainant, i am of the view that the direction issued by the trial court for taking petitioner to aiims in police custody is reasonable and justified.6. it is also seen that the trial court, by order dated 15.02.2019, as modified on 26.02.2019, has directed the petitioner to be taken in custody to aiims from 9 am to 5 pm and thereafter to be brought back to jail.7. keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances, the superintendent, jail is directed to take the petitioner in custody to such place and person as may be informed by the petitioner, from whom he has to collect money/make arrangements of funds for the purposes of treatment of his mother. he shall be taken in custody by officers in plain clothes at any time between 9 am to 5 pm, as may be required by the petitioner but for not more than 2 days. thereafter, after the arrangements for funds is made by the petitioner and his bail appln.653/2019 page 2 of 3 mother is admitted in hospital in aiims, petitioner shall also be taken to aiims in custody on the date of admission as also the day when investigation is to be performed between 9 am to 5 pm. on each of the days when the petitioner is taken out, he shall be brought back to jail latest by 5 pm.8. it is directed that the officers accompanying the petitioner shall be in plain clothes. it is further directed that in case the officers from the local police station visit aiims for any purpose connected with the petitioner, they shall do so only in plain clothes.9. petition is disposed of in the above terms.10. order dasti under signatures of the court master. march18 2019 st sanjeev sachdeva, j bail appln.653/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

18. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 653/2019 PREETAM SAINI versus STATE ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. K.C. Kashyap, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Sandeep, Crime Branch. Mr. Chetan Anand with Mr. Akash Srivastava, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner

seeks interim bail for the treatment of his mother in FIR No.219/2017 under Sections 3
IPC, Police Station New Friends Colony.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother requires to be admitted for investigation at AIIMS and investigation is to take place on 25.03.2019 and she has to be admitted one day before the said date. BAIL APPLN.653/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial court has permitted petitioner to be taken to AIIMS in police custody. He submits that for the treatment of his mother, he requires to make arrangements for funds.

4. Status report has been filed. The same is taken on record. Medical condition of the mother of the petitioner has been verified.

5. After hearing learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for the complainant, I am of the view that the direction issued by the trial court for taking petitioner to AIIMS in police custody is reasonable and justified.

6. It is also seen that the Trial Court, by order dated 15.02.2019, as modified on 26.02.2019, has directed the petitioner to be taken in custody to AIIMS from 9 am to 5 pm and thereafter to be brought back to Jail.

7. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances, the Superintendent, Jail is directed to take the petitioner in custody to such place and person as may be informed by the petitioner, from whom he has to collect money/make arrangements of funds for the purposes of treatment of his mother. He shall be taken in custody by officers in plain clothes at any time between 9 am to 5 pm, as may be required by the petitioner but for not more than 2 days. Thereafter, after the arrangements for funds is made by the petitioner and his BAIL APPLN.653/2019 Page 2 of 3 mother is admitted in hospital in AIIMS, petitioner shall also be taken to AIIMS in custody on the date of admission as also the day when investigation is to be performed between 9 am to 5 pm. On each of the days when the petitioner is taken out, he shall be brought back to jail latest by 5 pm.

8. It is directed that the officers accompanying the petitioner shall be in plain clothes. It is further directed that in case the officers from the local police station visit AIIMS for any purpose connected with the petitioner, they shall do so only in plain clothes.

9. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

10. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. MARCH18 2019 st SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J BAIL APPLN.653/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Preetam Saini vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition