Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cargill India Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.deepayan Mohanty
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:09. h July 2019 Judgment pronounced on:9. December 2019. + RFA(OS) 72/2018 CARGILL INDIA PVT LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shadan Farasat, Mr. Atif Shamim, Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocates. versus DEEPAYAN MOHANTY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Puri, Ms. Pragya Puri, Mr. Mizan Sidiqqui, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in a suit instituted by the respondent under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for recovery of Rs. 3,25,56,496/- along with interest. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall be referred to as Cargill and the respondent/plaintiff as DM.2. On 17.10.1996, DM joined the services of Bharat Cargill Holding Pvt. ...
Tusaj Lifestyle Pvt Ltd vs.skb Food Products Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2019 FAO3252016 & CM APPL. Nos.25744/2016, 25746-47/2016 TUSAJ LIFESTYLE PVT LTD Appellant SKB FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr.Sushant Mahapatra, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant impugns order dated 15.12.2016 whereby an application of the respondent/petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC was allowed and the appellant its agents were restrained from infringing the registered trademark of the respondent Yum Yum or passing of either in respect of restaurant or package food items or from using Yum Yum Tree or any other trademark identical or deceptively similar, phonetically or visually, with or without prefix or suffix to the trade mark of the respondent and from passing of their business. FAO. 325/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. Appell...
Daya Rani vs.chanchal Kumar Chanana & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1394/2015 Reserved on:26. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:09. h December, 2019 DAYA RANI ..... Plaintiff Through: None. versus CHANCHAL KUMAR CHANANA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Aditya Gaur, Advocate for D-1. Gupta & Ms.Pinki Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates for D-2. Mr. Ashish Kapur & Ms. Chhavi Luthra, Advoates for D-4 alongwith D-4 in person. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT I.A140042018 [by defendant No.4 under Order XXIII Rule 3 r/w Section 151 of transposition as plaintiff]. and I.A. 14645/2018 [by defendant No.4 under Section 151 of the CPC for recall of settlement]. in CS(OS) 1394/2015. the CPC for 1. The defendant No.4, Ms. Geeta Budhiraja, has filed these applications for transposition as a plaintiff in the suit, and for setting aside a mediated settlement dated 12.01.2016.2. The suit was instituted by Smt. Daya Rani, mother of the defendants, on 12.05.2015. She sought partition of certain properties own...
Veronica (Minor) Through: Mother Neetu Sodhi vs.jitendra Pal Singh Sod ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
* % + VERONICA (MINOR) THROUGH: MOTHER NEETU SODHI JITENDRA PAL SINGH SODHI & ORS ..... Defendants ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Deepak Verma, Adv. Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2019 CS(OS) 405/2016 & IAs No.9889/2016 & 11579/2018 (both u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 12536/2018 (u/S151CPC) Through: D-1 in person for D-2&3. Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff No.1 Ms. Veronica (Minor), acting through her mother plaintiff No.2 Neetu Sodhi, has instituted this suit for (i) declaration that the plaintiff No.1, being a coparcener and Class I heir, is entitled to a share of 1/18th + 1/72th of properties (a) B-10/329, Sunder Vihar, New Delhi, (b) Plot No.418, measuring 249.51 sq. yards, situated in the Hindustan Corporate House Building Society Limited, In Guruharkishan Nagar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, (c) land bearing Khasra Nos.21/1, 2/1, 20/2, 5/2, 14/21, 33/1, 15/14, 20 & 24 viz standard a...
Pradeep Aggarwal vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~51 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 6334/2019 PRADEEP AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Garima Verma, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. K K Ghei, APP for State WSI Sushila, PS Paschim Vihar Mr. Suman Saharan, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person Mr. Prabhas Roy, Adv. for R-3 to 7 with R-3 to 7 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 42211/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.1. 2. CRL.M.C.6334/2019 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C.6334/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seek quashing of FIR No.291/2011 dated 01.10.2011 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and respondent nos.3 to 7 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is t...
Umesh Kumar & Anr vs.ram Kaur ( Deceased ) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 12.2019 RC.REV. 182/2018 & CM APPL. 17620/2018 UMESH KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioners versus RAM KAUR ( DECEASED ) THR LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.L.Mahajan with Mr.Gaurav Mahajan and Ms.Meena Mahajan, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.G.P.Thareja, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 29.01.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from the tenanted premises being shop (Corner), Ground Floor in property No.1/20, Road No.20, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi-110026, more RC.REV.182/2018 Page ...
Manmohan Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 4060/2019 & RL.M.A.33702/2019 & 36891/2019 MANMOHAN SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv with Mr. Kushank Singh, Mr. Abhinav, Mr. Yashovardhan & Mr. Syed Massod, Advocates STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Dharmender, PS Vasant Kunj (N) Mr. Sunny Sharma & Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek directions thereby to quash the FIR No.576/2016 dated 02.12.2016, registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj North, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 323/ 341/354/354B/5IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.2. The case of the petitioners is that they are residents of Sector-A, Pocket-B & C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and respondent no.2 is the complainant in the FIR mentioned above, filed against the ...
Ajay Kaushik & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~67 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 6288/2019 AJAY KAUSHIK & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rahul Nagpal, Adv. with petitioners in person STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. K K Ghei, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI. Ashok, PS Farsh Bazar Mr. Jitender Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 42058/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6288/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.884/2014 dated 13.11.2014 registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6288/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got marrie...
Sahil Sethi & Ors vs.state, n.c.t of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6296/2019 SAHIL SETHI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. versus STATE, N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Sangeeta, ASI Narender Pal, Mukherjee Nagar Respondent no.3 in person Adv. (appearance not given) for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.653/2018 dated 22.11.2018 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for respondent no.3 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 6296/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.3 got married on 01.12.2017 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between...
Md. Sonu vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12487/2018 MD. SONU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Government Counsel with Ms. Bushra Waseem, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0612.2019 1. The... Petitioner, who is serving in the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB), has filed this petition challenging orders dated 23rd April, 2018 and 30th August, 2018, as well as a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 20th October, 2018 issued to him terminating his services as Constable (GD).2. The background facts are that Respondent No.4 Staff Selection Commission (SSC) issued an advertisement dated 15th December, 2012 for filling up the post of Constable (GD) in the CAPF and Rifle Man (GD) in Assam Rifles, 2013. The... Petitioner applied for the posts as an OBC candidate enclosing his OBC certificate issued from...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »