Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K C Sharma (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.himanshu Sikka & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:28. h November, 2019 RFA5392018 & CM APPL No.27513/2018 K C SHARMA (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.S.K.Sahijpal and Ms.Yashika Yadav, Advs. HIMANSHU SIKKA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mir Akhtar Hussain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 passed by ADJ-03, Rohini Courts, Delhi in CS No.15/2015 whereby suit under Order 37 CPC filed by the respondent for recovery of 8,72,123/- was decreed in favour of respondent and against the appellant herein.2. The suit was filed on the premise the appellant and his son-in-law were partners in a partnership firm dealing in wholesale and retail business in paper and paper products in the name and style of M/s Balaji Paper mart and have placed orders to the respondent for the supply of stationary in which the respondent was dealing. It was alleged by the appellan...
Meena Sharma vs.seema and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h November, 2019 CM(M) 589/2017 and CM APPL. 20235/2017 MEENA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi, Mr. Moksh Pasrija and Ms. Reshma Pasrija, Advocates (M:97113. 4028). SEEMA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Dalip Rastogi, Advocate for R Ms. Puja Kalra and Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate for R-2, NDMC (M:93128. 9323). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 33723/2018 (seeking waiver of the costs of Rs.10,000/-) 1. This is an application for waiver of the costs of Rs. 10,000/-. In view of the facts stated therein, the costs are reduced to Rs. 5,000/- which shall be paid within a period of one week from today.2. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 589/2017 and CM APPL. 20235/2017 3. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 31st January, 2017 by which the application by the... Petitioner under Order I Rule 10 seeking imp...
Kishan Lal vs.sushil Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 453/2019 Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2019 KISHAN LAL versus SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. G.K. Kaushik, Mr. Abhinav Kaushik and Mr. Nandan Goel, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 18.03.2019, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from tenanted premises on the ground floor bearing shop No.B-69/1, Jagat Puri, Gali Shiv Mandir Wali, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition. RC.REV. 453/2019 Page 1 ...
Directorate of Education vs.manisha Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
W.P.(C) 8494/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 * + DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocates with Mr. Shashi Pal Singh, OSD, Zone-7 versus MANISHA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr M. K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. . CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2811.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Directorate of Education (DoE), Government of NCT of Delhi has filed this writ petition challenging an order dated 14th July, 2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT), allowing O.A. No.3994/2013 filed by the Respondent herein whereby it was directed that the... Petitioner issue appropriate orders, accepting the Respondents request for withdrawal of her resignation, and allowing her to resume duty. The CAT also directed that the period of interruption from the date of her resignation i.e. 9th March, 2012, till the date the Respon...
Dr. Sanjeev Bagai vs.manipal Hospitals (Dwarka) Pvt. Ltd. Through Its ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~A-63 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h November, 2019 + ARB.P. 240/2019 DR. SANJEEV BAGAI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vivek Sibal and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates. versus MANIPAL HOSPITALS (DWARKA) PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, DR. SUDERSHAN BALLAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Namit Suri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. A letter has been received from Mr. Justice Rajendra Menon, Former Chief Justice of this Court intimating that due to his recent appointment as Chairman of the Armed Forces Tribunal, he would be unable to conduct further proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits, on instructions from the respondent, that he has no objection to the appointment of another Arbitrator.3. With the consent of the parties, Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed, Former Chief Justice of Jammu & Kashmir High Court is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. ARB.P. 240/2...
Akhlaq vs.dayawati & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2019 RC.REV. 236/2017 AKHLAQ DAYAWATI & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.K. Bhalla, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Ranjeet Bedi and Mr. M. Wajid, Advocates with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 20.03.2017, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from one shop on the ground floor of premises bearing No.1911, Gali Kallu Wali. Chowk Suiwalan, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-110002, more particularly RC.REV. 236/2017 Page 1 of 3 as shown in red colour in t...
Universal Contractors & Engineers (P) Ltd vs.the National Projects Con ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI28h November, 2019 Date of decision:30. h September, 2019 CS(COMM) No.1000/2018 UNIVERSAL CONTRACTORS & ENGINEERS (P) LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Raghav Mehdirath, Adv. Versus THE NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD. ...Defendant Through: Mr. Rajat Arora & Vishalakshi Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This suit for recovery of Rs.4,91,99,187.71 paise, post completion of pleadings, is ripe for framing of issues. The counsel for the defendant however contends that the suit claim, on the basis of averments in the plaint and documents filed by the defendant and admitted by the plaintiff, is barred by time.2. 3. The counsels have been heard on the said aspect. The plaintiff has instituted this suit, pleading that (i) the defendant, on 27th December, 2011 floated a tender inviting bids for execution of the work of Construction of Permanent Building Package-1: Academic Block (Institute of Tribal Science &...
Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41334/2019 (delay) MANOJ KUMAR @ MONU & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Jamil, PS Khyala Complainant /R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41333/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.380/2017 dated 27.12.2017 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.04.2016 as per Hin...
Kawaljeet Singh & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h November, 2019 + CM(M) 1421/2019 & CM APPL. 43072/2019 KAWALJEET SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.L. Bajaj, Advocate. (M:9810987273) versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Om Prakash, Jr. Asstt/o/o LAC(W), Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar Advocates for R-1 (M-9910770311) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The prayer in the present petition is that the... RESPONDENTS ought to be directed to trace the reference filed by the... Petitioner on 24th May, 2001 which was not traceable in the records of the ld. Designated Court under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2. The order dated 27th July, 2017 passed by the ld. Designated Court reads as under: As per report of the Ahlmad no such reference received by this court in the year 2012, therefore, no reference petition can be traced out by the staff of this court. Application is di...
Sushila @ Anr vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :17. 10.2019 % Pronounced on :28. 11.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 234/2019 and CRL.M.A. 4573/2019 SUSHILA @ ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Mr. Ankit Mutreja, Mr. Amit Rana, Ms. Ruchika, Advocates versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Ashmita, PS Najafgarh. Mr. Rambir Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT1 The present revision petition has been preferred by the revisionists challenging the impugned order dated 19.01.2019 passed by the Ld. Trial Court whereby the following charge was framed against both the revisionists: That on 01.05.2018 at 11:15 AM at house No.46 P-3 Block, Gali no.-10, New Roshanpura, Najafgarh, New Delhi within the Crl. Rev. 234/2019 Page 1 of 9 jurisdiction of PS Najafgarh you both in furtherance of your common intention voluntarily caused miscarriage to Mrs. Neelam who was...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »