Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors vs.the State & Anr

Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors vs The State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 28, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226944

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1226944
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 28, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors

Respondent

The State & Anr

Excerpt

.....for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.04.2016 as per hindu rites and rituals. however, due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 21.05.2017.5. the petitioner and respondent no.2, with the advice and guidance of the family members and relatives, have arrived at an amicable settlement vide a mou dated 16.09.2019 thereby resolving all their disputes and differences and have started living together as husband and wife in a rented accommodation.6. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by asi jamil of police station khyala and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.5. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. crl.m.c. 6071/2019 page 2 of 3 6. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.380/2017 dated 27.12.2017 registered at police station khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. the petition is allowed accordingly. order dasti pending application stands disposed of as infructuous.7. 8.9. (suresh kumar kait) judge november28 2019 sm crl.m.c. 6071/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

28. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41334/2019 (delay) MANOJ KUMAR @ MONU & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Jamil, PS Khyala Complainant /R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41333/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.380/2017 dated 27.12.2017 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.04.2016 as per Hindu rites and rituals. However, due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 21.05.2017.

5. The petitioner and respondent no.2, with the advice and guidance of the family members and relatives, have arrived at an amicable settlement vide a MOU dated 16.09.2019 thereby resolving all their disputes and differences and have started living together as husband and wife in a rented accommodation.

6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by ASI Jamil of Police Station Khyala and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

5. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 2 of 3 6. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.380/2017 dated 27.12.2017 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. The petition is allowed accordingly. Order dasti Pending application stands disposed of as infructuous.

7. 8.

9. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER28 2019 sm CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors vs The State & Anr Same Subject Land Acquisition