Skip to content

Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 19 2019

Sonu @ Shahnawaz vs.state (Nct Govt of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2019 CRL.A. 1141/2017 SONU @ SHAHNAWAZ versus ..... Appellant STATE (NCT GOVT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Suhil Kumar Jain with Ms Krishnashree Devi, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Amit Gupta, APP for State. SI Rahul, PS Bhajanpura. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present appeal arises out of a judgement dated 31.05.2017 passed by the Learned ASJ, (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, whereby the Appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 397/392/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). By an order dated 08.06.2017, the appellant has been sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 397 IPC; three years of rigorous imprisonment and fine of 1000/- for the offence under Section 392 IPC and in default, simple imprisonment for one month; and simple imprisonment for six...


Nov 19 2019

Mangt. Of Birla Textiles vs.ram Swaroop

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-19.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 2814/2007 MANGT. OF BIRLA TEXTILES ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. M.Y. Khan, Adv. versus RAM SWAROOP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Adv. with Mr.Khrunesh Shah, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the management assails the order dated 29.01.2007 passed by the Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Courts in OP No.94/2005. Under the impugned order, the Tribunal has rejected the petitioners approval application filed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act for short).2. The respondent joined the petitioner/Mill in October 1970 and was an active member of Textile Mazdoor Congress (Regd.). On 12.01.1984 the workman was issued a charge sheet alleging that he along with 30 other workmen had, on 10.01.1984 at about 11.30 am, forcibly entered the WPC2814/2007 Page 1 of 8 administrative block and mi...


Nov 19 2019

Ajay Garg @ Ajay Aggarwal vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4228/2017 Date of decision:19.11.2019 AJAY GARG @ AJAY AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Jain, Mr. R.S. Nirwan, versus Advs. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Keshav Puram Mr. H.S. Sasan, Adv. for R-2 to 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.141/2009 dated 31.05.2009 registered at Police Station Keshav Puram and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Notice issued.3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 5.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 4228/2017 Page 1 of 3 5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 have no ob...


Nov 19 2019

M/S Vashisht Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:03. 09.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:19. 11.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 1280/2019 M/S VASHISHT INFRATECH PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Attin Rastogi, Mr. Shiv Kumar, Mr. R. K. Singh, Ms. Beauty Singh and Mr. Randeep Punder, Advs. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with Mr. Karan Jeet Rai Sharma with SI Vinod Yadav from EOW. Mr. Sunil Dalal and Mr. Vivek Jain, Adv. For R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J1 This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 482Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners for quashing of W.P.(CRL) 1280/2019 Page 1 of 10 FIR No.07u/s 420/468/471/34/120B IPC, PS Najafgarh, New Delhi.2. While praying for quashing of FIR, the petitioner has pleaded that petitioner no.1 who is a Pvt. Ltd. company through its Director/AR Mr. Karan Vashishta @ Madhup Vashisht i.e. petitioner no.2 a...


Nov 19 2019

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.naincy Sagar & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7132019 & C.M. APPL.48802-48804/2019 + Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Date of decision:19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAINCY SAGAR & ANR Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, for respondent No.1. AND + LPA7172019 & C.M. APPL.49163-49165/2019 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus PRATEEK SOLANKI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, LPA713& 717/20...


Nov 19 2019

Manju Singh & Anr. Vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :22. 10.2019 Pronounced on :19.11.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2207/2019 MANJU SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners STATE Through: Mr. Bankey Bihari and Mr. Birendra Bikram, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Amit, P.S.Kalyan Puri. Mr. Girish Chandra and Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER1 This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.339/2019 dated 21.07.2019 under Sections 420/468/4IPC, registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, East District, Delhi. Bail Appln. 2207/2019 Page 1 of 10 2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainant alleged that on 04.03.2019 one person namely Jamuna Prasad (petitioner No.2 herein) alongwith Manju Singh (petitioner No.1 herein) whom Jamuna Prasad introduced as his wife came to the complainant for taking first fl...


Nov 19 2019

Devinder vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Judgment Reserved on :21. 10.2019 Date of Decision :19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF + CRL.A. 28/2013 KULDEEP & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mohd. Shamikh, Advocate. STATE CRL.A. 131/2013 DEVINDER STATE versus Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for State. ..... Respondent AND Through: Mohd. Shamikh, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 By way of the present appeals, the appellants have assailed the common judgment on conviction dated 08.10.2012 and order on sentence dated 19.12.2012 in FIR No.6under Sections 3IPC and Sections 25/27/of the Arms Act, P.S. Nand Nagri whereby all the appellants were convicted under Sections 3IPC and were sentenced to RI for four years along with fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default whereof to undergo RI for one year. It was also directed that the fine imposed i.e., CRL.A. 28/2013 & CRL.A. 131/2013 P a g e 1 of 18 Rs.1,00,000/- (i...


Nov 19 2019

Surender Singh vs.state & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5854/2019 SURENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Manish Bansal, Adv with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS. Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Pukhraj, PS Prashant Vihar Mr. Roshan Lal goel & Ms. Anju Gupta, Advs. for R-2 to 7 with respondents in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40531/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 7.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The pr...


Nov 19 2019

State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.akram

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

8 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 615/2019 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner AKRAM Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Bishambar, PS Mundka. versus Through: None. ..... Respondent Date of Decision:19. h November, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CRL. M.A. 40551/2019 Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the criminal leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CRL. M.A. 40552/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CRL.L.P. 615/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment/order of acquittal dated 04th June, 2019 passed by Page 1 of 6 CRL. L.P. 615/2019 Additional Session Judge06, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in State Case UID No.56015/16, New SC No.1and Old SC No.1titled State vs. Akram arising out of FIR...


Nov 19 2019

Sahara India Commerical Corporation Ltd vs.vijay Kumar Agarwal & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2019

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2019 + CM(M) 1646/2019 and CM APPL. 49853/2019, 49854/2019 SAHARA INDIA COMMERICAL CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Ms. Neha Gupta, Ms. Rhea Dube and Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal, Advocates. VIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order of the NCDRC dated 29th August, 2019 by which the... Petitioner has been directed to make a deposit of the entire decretal amount. Mr. Ashish Dholakia, ld. counsel for the... Petitioner submits that strangely, the NCDRC has neither decided the admission of the petition, nor issued notice, and there has been no stay of the operation of order of the State Commission. He further submits that while the... Petitioner is willing to deposit the decretal amount as a condition for maintaining the Revisio...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial