Surender Singh vs.state & Ors

Surender Singh vs State & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 19, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226778

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1226778
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 19, 2019
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surender Singh

Respondent

State & Ors

Excerpt

.....app for the state and counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 7.6. with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent nos. 2 to 7 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.8. respondent no.2 to 7 are personally present in court with learned counsel and have been identified by si pukhraj/io, p.s. prashant vihar and submit that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 7 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement agreement dated 06.09.2019 before the delhi high court mediation & conciliation centre, copy whereof has been placed on record along with the instant petition as annexure-b.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. crl.m.c.5854/2019 page 2 of 3 11. for the reasons afore-recorded, fir no.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at p.s. prashant vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly.13. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge november19 2019 sm crl.m.c.5854/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5854/2019 SURENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner

Through Mr. Manish Bansal, Adv with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS. Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS

SI Pukhraj, PS Prashant Vihar Mr. Roshan Lal goel & Ms. Anju Gupta, Advs. for R-2 to 7 with respondents in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40531/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 7.

6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent Nos. 2 to 7 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8. Respondent No.2 to 7 are personally present in Court with learned counsel and have been identified by SI Pukhraj/IO, P.S. Prashant Vihar and submit that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. The petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 7 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Settlement Agreement dated 06.09.2019 before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, copy whereof has been placed on record along with the instant petition as Annexure-B.

10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 2 of 3 11. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.253/2018 dated 22.05.2018, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12. The petition is allowed accordingly.

13. Order dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER19 2019 sm CRL.M.C.5854/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Surender Singh vs State & Ors Same Subject Education