Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raju Nischal & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 CRL.M.C. 4595/2019 RAJU NISCHAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Reema Roy, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Nihal Vihar Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No 1. 65/2010 dated 09.04.2010 registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 4595/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 02.11.2009 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately 5. ...
Tulsi Ram vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 11.2019 + W.P.(C) 12368/2019 TULSI RAM Through: versus ........ Petitioner Mr. Sumit Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Prateek Kohli, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.50610/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.12368/2019 Notice to show cause as to why the petition be not admitted.2. Mr. Jagjit Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents enters appearance and accepts notice. WPC No.12368/2019 page 1 of 4 3. The present petition is directed against order dated 22.05.2019 and order passed in review application dated 19.08.2019 by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal for short).4. ...
Momeen vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :14. 11.2019 Pronounced on :25. 11.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2767/2019 MOMEEN ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. + BAIL APPLN. 2769/2019 AMIR AMEEN ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. Bail Appln. Nos. 2767/2019, 2769/2019 & 2770/2019 Page 1 of 6 + BAIL APPLN. 2770/2019 TAQVEEM ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER1 By this common order, I shall dispose of three bail applications bearing No.2767/2019, 2769/2019 and 2770/2019...
Bhubaneshwar Expressways Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Highways Authority of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. 09.2019 Pronounced on:25. 11.2019 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 218/2019 BHUBANESHWAR EXPRESSWAYS PVT. LTD. Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate ........ Petitioner with Mr. Abhyudai Singh, Mr. Sidhant Kumar and Mr. Sahil Tandon, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Mr. Satish Kumar Mishra, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking a direction to the respondent to pay/deposit an amount of Rs. 3,37,73,19,434.10/- which constitutes 90% of the debt due amount as per the provisions of Concession Agreement, along with interest on the aforesaid amount from the date of termination i.e. from 20.03.2017 till 90 days therefrom, at a rate 3% above the Bank rate and further interest till the date of actual p...
Ajay Tiwari vs.university of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP (C) 1288/2012 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, Adv. with Ms. Tanvi Sapra, Adv. versus AJAY TIWARI UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT2511.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Tanya Agarwal, Adv. for R-2 % 1. These proceedings emanate from a complaint, dated 9th September, 2008, submitted by Ms. M (whose name is being withheld, for the sake of propriety), an M. Phil. Student in the Department of Hindi, University of Delhi, wherein she alleged that she had been sexually harassed by the petitioner who, at the time, was a Professor in the said Department. The complaint was referred to the Apex Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as ACC), under Ordinance XV-D of the Ordinances governing the University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the University). The ACC found the allegation of sexual harassment, against the petitioner, to b...
Allahabad Bank vs.malayan Banking Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :29. h March, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:25. November, 2019 RFA(OS)27/2017 ALLAHABAD BANK ..... Appellant Through Mr.J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Ms.Yamini Khurana, Mr. Sugham Seth, Ms.Manisha Mehta, Ms.Vaishali Tanwar Shekhar, Advocates. and Ms.M. versus MALAYAN BANKING LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravinder Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Devmani Bansal, Ms.Jagriti Ahuja Sharma, Advocates and Mr.Amol CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 filed by the appellant impugning the judgment dated 20.01.2017 by which a Single Judge of this Court has dismissed the application seeking leave to defend and has decreed the suit in favour of the respondent.2. The brief facts which are required to be noticed for the...
Mrs Basant Verma vs.m/s Namdhari Seeds
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % Reserved on:21. t November, 2019 Decided on :25. h November, 2019 + RFA3142013 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Naveen Kr Chaudhary, Adv. versus MRS BASANT VERMA M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through : None YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. Per order dated 26.09.2019, none appeared on behalf the respondent despite service.2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 30.03.2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-02/South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.53/2011 whereby the suit of the appellant for recovery of Rs.19,93,065/- along with interest was partly decreed and disposed of.3. a) The brief facts are:-"the appellant / plaintiff had given the Ground Floor premises of Property bearing No.H-6, Green Park Main, New Delhi - 110016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'suit property') on rent to the ...
Ravinder & Anr vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~64 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6000/2019 Date of decision:25. 11.2019 RAVINDER & ANR ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Sakhi Sachdeva with Mr. Akshay Kumar, Advs. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT THE STATE & ANR Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Respondent no.2 in person ASI Jitender, PS Kanjhawala ........ RESPONDENTS Crl. M.A. 41085/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6000/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.109/2012 dated 21.05.2012 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6000/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.03.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incom...
Ashok Kumar Bagdi & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~57 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 CRL.M.C. 5987/2019 ASHOK KUMAR BAGDI & ORS Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Mr. Thakur Ankit Singh, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Anil Kumar PS BHD Nagar, Delhi. Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41048/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5987/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.46/2016 dated 01.02.2016 , registered at PS Baba Haridas CRL.M.C. 5987/2019 Page 1 of 4 Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5.6. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State. The learned Additional public prosecutor has opposed the present petition and submits that the complainant had filed the complaint in the year 200...
Rich Pal Singh vs.asstt. General Manager, Syndicate Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 6521/2015 & CM APPL.11872/2015 RICH PAL SINGH Through: Mr.Inderpal Khokhar, Mr.Gaurav ........ Petitioner Solanki, Advocates versus ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahindru, Ms.Laxmi along with Senior Kumari, Advocates Mr.Ashok Manager(HR), Syndicate Bank Saxena, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award of the Industrial Tribunal 1. whereby his claim for reinstatement in service was dismissed.2. The petitioner was working with the respondent Bank as an attender. In January, 2003, the petitioner was posted at the extension counter of the Bank at DTC Wazirpur Depot Extension Branch. On 27th May, 2003, shortage of Rs.600/- was found in two packets of Rs.100/- denomination whereupon the officials verified the entire cash kept in the double lock and further found shortage of Rs.700/- (seven notes in the packet...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »