Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ravinder & Anr vs.the State & Anr

Ravinder & Anr vs The State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 25, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226849

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravinder & Anr

Respondent

The State & Anr

Excerpt

.....6000/2019 page 1 of 3 5. notice is accepted by learned app for the and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.03.2010 as per hindu rites and rituals. due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 21.04.2010.7. the petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the mediation centre, rohini courts on 22.12.2015 and settled all their disputes amicably.8. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by asi jitender of police station kanjhawala and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. crl.m.c. 6000/2019 page 2 of 3 10. for the reasons afore-recorded, fir no.109/2012 dated 21.05.2012 registered at police station kanjhawala and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.11. the petition is allowed accordingly.12. order dasti (suresh kumar kait) judge novembmer25 2019 ms crl.m.c. 6000/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~64 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6000/2019 Date of decision:

25. 11.2019 RAVINDER & ANR ........ Petitioner

Through Ms. Sakhi Sachdeva with Mr. Akshay Kumar, Advs. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT THE STATE & ANR Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Respondent no.2 in person ASI Jitender, PS Kanjhawala ........ RESPONDENTS

Crl. M.A. 41085/2019 JUDGMENT

(ORAL) 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6000/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.109/2012 dated 21.05.2012 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6000/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.03.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 21.04.2010.

7. The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts on 22.12.2015 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by ASI Jitender of Police Station Kanjhawala and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. CRL.M.C. 6000/2019 Page 2 of 3 10. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.109/2012 dated 21.05.2012 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBMER25 2019 ms CRL.M.C. 6000/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial