Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pratibha Chauhan vs.state Election Commission & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~113 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7392019 and CM Nos. 50897, 50898/2019 Date of decision:26. h November, 2019 PRATIBHA CHAUHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, SC with Mr. Devanshu Lahiry, Adv. for R-1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2611.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM Nos. 50897/2019 and 50898/2019 (exemptions) 1.2. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. LPA7392019 1. The appellant herein is the original respondent no.1 in W.P.(C) 8043/2018.2. The impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge on 5th November, 2019 is as under : List on 16th April, 2020. LPA7392019 Page 1 of 2 Interim order to continue. 3. Against the aforesaid order of adjournment, the present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred which is not tenable in law. As the W.P.(C) 8043/2018...
Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. Vs.rakshak Kapoor & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 169/2016 Reserved on:20. 08.2019 Date of Decision :26. 11.2019 MOTILAL OSWAL SECURITIES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pradeep Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sunil Goyal, Ms.Anupama Dhingra, Mr.Deepak, Advs. versus RAKSHAK KAPOOR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Suresh Khadav, Mr.Varun K.Bala, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Appellate Arbitral Award dated 03.02.2015 passed by the Panel of Appellate Arbitral Tribunal at the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the NSE) under the Byelaws, Rules and Regulations of the NSE.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a stock-broker and a member of the NSE and had engaged respondent no.2 as its Sub- Broker...
All India General Kamgar Union vs.jawaharlal Nehru Univerisity (Jnu) a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"26.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 10137/2019 & C.M.No.41876/2019 ALL INDIA GENERAL KAMGAR UNION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gunjan Singh and Mr. Arun Kasi, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERISITY (JNU) AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Mr. Navdeep Singh and Mr. Parth Shekhar, Advs. for R1. Mr. Harneet Kaur, Adv. for R2. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor and Mr. Rohan Anand, Advs. for R3/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the All India General Kamgar Union seeks a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 not to terminate the services of 500 Security Guards, who claim to be working in the premises of the respondent No.1-University, on the ground that they are employees of the respondent no.1, and not of the respondent no.2 contractor as the contract between the respondent nos.1 and 2 was a sham and camouflage.2. As the peti...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.abbas & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
8 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 634/2019 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Insp. Azam Khan, PS Jamia Nagar. versus ABBAS & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS Date of Decision:26. h November, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): CRL. M.A. 41126/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 634/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment dated 21st August, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge01 (POCSO), South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi acquitting the respondents-accused in Sessions Case No.21(Old No.77/12) in FIR No.749/2012 registered with Police Station Jamia Nagar, Page 1 of 8 CRL. L.P. 634/2019 District South-East, under Sections 363/3IPC & 376 IPC as well as Sections 4, 5 and 6 ...
Mep Infrastructure Developers Ltd vs.sdmc and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~A-92 * % + W.P.(C) 12483/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 11.2019 MEP INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LTD......... Petitioner Through Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr.Mukul Rohatgi and Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Advs. with Mr.Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Mr.Roahn Jaitley, Mr. Shushant Sarkar and Mr. Akshay Sharma, Advs. Versus SDMC AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gaurab Banerji, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Harsha Peechara, SC, SDMC with Mr.Raka Chaterjee, Mr.S.P. Mukherjee, Ms.Ishita Mishra and Mr. Mohit Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM APPL. No.50934/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 12483/2019 and CM APPL. No.50933/2019 1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-"a. Issuance a suitable writ, order and direction declaring that in the guise of section 113 (2) (g) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 the petitioner cannot be compelled to pay to the respondent No.l more than the actual amou...
M/S Himland Housing Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.m/s Ombir Panwar Huf
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RFA5622019 and CM APPL No.27431-32/2019 Delivered on :26. h November, 2019 M/S HIMLAND HOUSING PVT LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh and Ms.Sangeeta, Advs. versus M/S OMBIR PANWAR HUF ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rajendra Sahu with Mr.Vineet CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Kumar, Advs. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal challenges the impugned order and decree dated 11.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-01/ Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/ (hereinafter referred to as the learned Trial Court) in Civil Suit No.286/2017 whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.21.00 lacs was decreed to the extent of Rs.6.00 lacs on allowing of the application of respondent under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.2. The CM APPL No.27432/2019 is moved by the appellant/ applicant seeking condonation delay of 173 days in filing the appeal on the ground the certified copy of the ...
Sumit Chandra & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26.11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6009/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41135/2019 (stay) SUMIT CHANDRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Vishal Kumar, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Kuldeep, PS Palam Village R-2 in person ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 41134/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6009/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.334/2018 dated 19.09.2018 registered at Police Station Palam Village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6009/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and the respondent no.2, who is present in person in the Court. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got...
Peoples All India Anti Corruption and Crime Prevention Society( Regd.) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~116 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2019 Review Pet. 489/2019 and CM Nos.50711, 50713, 50714, 50715/2019 in + W.P.(C) 2464/2016 PEOPLE'S ALL INDIA ANTI CORRUPTION AND CRIME ........ Petitioner PREVENTION SOCIETY( REGD.) Through: Mr. P.V. Surendranath, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Subhash Chandran K.R., Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran and Mr. Sawan Kumar Shukla, Advs. versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DLEHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, ASC-GNCTD with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. for R-1 to 3 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC(DTC) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2611.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM Nos. 50713/2019 and 50715/2019(exemptions) 1.2. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM No.50711/2019 (permission to file review petition) 3. As the review petition has been filed and taken up for hearing today, this application stand...
Anand Sarup vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4021/2014 ANAND SARUP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Pandey, Mr. Ranjeet Singh and Mr. Rizwan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Upendra Sai, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2611.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayer in the present petition by an Inspector in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is for grant of seniority as Inspector from the date he was promoted as Inspector in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) from where he came to the CBI initially on deputation and was later absorbed as such.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner joined the CRPF on 17th September, 1985 as Assistant Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) [ASI (M)].. He was promoted as Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) [SI (M)]. on 29th January, 1992. W.P.(C) 4021/2014 Page 1 of 8 3. He applied for deputation to the ...
Rajinder Aggarwal vs.surendra Kakar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 11.2019 RC.REV. 134/2018 RAJINDER AGGARWAL versus SURENDRA KAKAR & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bharat Deepak and Mr. Siddhant Asthana, Advocates. For the Respondent: Dr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kuber Giri, Advocate with respondent Girish Kakar in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT RC.REV. 134/2018 & CM APPL.13501/2018 APPL.13502/2018 (for additional documents) (stay), CM1... Petitioner impugns order dated 31.10.2017, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from portion of the RC.REV. 134/2018 P...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »