Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sumit Chandra & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Sumit Chandra & Anr. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 26, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226864

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumit Chandra & Anr.

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....is taken up for final disposal.6. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 26.05.2017 as per hindu rites and rituals. due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 19.12.2017.7. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide compromise deed dated 20.08.2019 and have settled all their disputes amicably.8. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si kuldeep of police station palam village and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. crl.m.c.6009/2019 page 2 of 3 10. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.334/2018 dated 19.09.2018 registered at police station palam village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.11. though the complainant has agreed to get the aforementioned fir quashed, but she has apprehension that the petitioner might interfere in her matrimonial life, which she is going to start further.12. i hereby make it clear that if the petitioners make any hanky-panky in the life of the complainant, she is at liberty to get the aforementioned fir revived.13. the petition is allowed accordingly.14. order dasti 15. pending application stands disposed of. (suresh kumar kait) judge november26 2019 sm crl.m.c.6009/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26.11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6009/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41135/2019 (stay) SUMIT CHANDRA & ANR. ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr. Vishal Kumar, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Kuldeep, PS Palam Village R-2 in person ........ RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 41134/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6009/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.334/2018 dated 19.09.2018 registered at Police Station Palam Village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6009/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and the respondent no.2, who is present in person in the Court. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 26.05.2017 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 19.12.2017.

7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Compromise Deed dated 20.08.2019 and have settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Kuldeep of Police Station Palam Village and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. CRL.M.C.6009/2019 Page 2 of 3 10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.334/2018 dated 19.09.2018 registered at Police Station Palam Village and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

11. Though the complainant has agreed to get the aforementioned FIR quashed, but she has apprehension that the petitioner might interfere in her matrimonial life, which she is going to start further.

12. I hereby make it clear that if the petitioners make any hanky-panky in the life of the complainant, she is at liberty to get the aforementioned FIR revived.

13. The petition is allowed accordingly.

14. Order dasti 15. Pending application stands disposed of. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER26 2019 sm CRL.M.C.6009/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Sumit Chandra & Anr. vs State & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales