Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Joginder @ Danny vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 10.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3002/2019 JOGINDER @ DANNY ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Gulati and Mr. Ghanshyam Kaishik, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with SI Sandeep, P.S.: Mangol Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J( Oral) The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C) has been filed seeking extension of parole for a period of two months on the ground that surgery of the daughter of the petitioner is fixed for 07.11.2019 and she will be admitted on 05.11.2019. Status report has been handed over in Court. Same is placed on record. The fact regarding the surgery of the daughter of the petitioner W.P.(Crl.) 3002/2019 Page 1 of 2 has been verified by the Station House Officer, P.S.: Mangol Puri, New Delhi...
Veena Gupta vs.bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h October, 2019 + CM (M) 1555/2019 VEENA GUPTA Through: Ms. Neha ........ Petitioner Garg, Advocate. versus (M:9911536363) BAJAJ ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 47107/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM (M) 1555/2019 2. The... Petitioner challenges the order dated 17th September, 2019 by which, according to ld. counsel for the... Petitioner, costs of Rs.4,000/- has been imposed upon the... Petitioner/Plaintiff (hereinafter the Plaintiff) without any basis or ground. She submits that on the said date, there was no default by the Plaintiff, who had in fact, entered appearance in the morning and the process servers statement was also recorded. She further submits that the matter was put up at 2:30 PM for passing of appropriate orders and the impugned order was pa...
Smt Omwati vs.satish Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 1877/2017 SMT OMWATI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Kaushik, Adv. versus SATISH KUMAR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 27.02.2017, whereby the learned Trial Court had dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner.2. The present petition is filed on the ground that in the impugned order, the learned Trial Court had observed that none appeared on behalf of the complainant on two consecutive dates, whereas, as per the order sheets, on 23.04.2016, the petitioner/complainant was present in Court with her counsel and the matter was adjourned to 18.10.2016. Further, on 18.10.2016, the petitioner/ complainant had sought exemption on the ground that she was unwell. CRL.M.C. 1877/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. Fact remains that the complaint was f...
M/S Telecon India and Ors. Vs.railway Board and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~1 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3910/2018 M/S TELECON INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate versus RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocate for the Railways. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The three contractors, petitioners herein, who are engaged in the business of mechanised cleaning of railway stations and trains and on- board housekeeping, have challenged the eligibility criteria, more particularly the weightage formula and the criteria of minimum qualifying marks for the technical bid as contained in Clauses 1.2.2.1, 1.2.2.2 and 1.2.2.3 of the Standard Bid Document for Mechanised W.P.(C) 3910/2018 Page 1 of 6 Cleaning and H...
Anti-Corruption Council of India Trust Through Its Authorised Signator ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11455/2019 ANTI-CORRUPTION COUNCIL OF INDIA TRUST THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY A IMRAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Singh, Mr. Hussain Mueen Farooq, Ms. B. Sudha, Mr. Mohd. Kamran Khan, Mr. Ajeet Kumar Sharma, Mr. Osama Abbasi, Mr.Mohit Aaadarsh, Mr. Imran Pandith & Mr.Vineet, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD for R-1, 2 & 3 SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer, Traffic Mr. Ajit Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for DRI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) CM APPL. 47063/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11455/2019 1. This writ petition (Public Interest Litigation) has been preferred with the following prayers: i. Pass directions to the... RESPONDENTS to ensure the automatic audio announcement...
Amir Ain vs.qaadira
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~ 27 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th October, 2019 RSA3702015 & CM Nos. 24480/2015, 42184/2018, 43217/2019 AMIR AIN Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Rishabh ..... Appellant Dheer, Mr. Amol Acharya & Mr. Rayadurgam Bharat, Advs. with appellant in person. Versus QAADIRA Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Jia Kapur ..... Respondent & Mr. Pranav Pathak, Advs. with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondent had instituted civil suit (CS No.276/2013) against the appellant herein on 05.06.2013 seeking a decree of possession of one room with kitchen and bathroom at first floor of property bearing No.I-100, Muradi Road, Batla House, Village Okhla, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi. The suit was decreed, after contest, by the court of Administrative Civil Judge, by judgment dated 26.09.2014, the operative part reading thus:-"The suit of the plaintiff stands decreed. A decree of possession of one room with kitchen and bathroom facility RSA ...
Renu & Ors vs.iffco Tokio Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 842/2019 RENU & ORS Decided on:30. 10.2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus IFFCO TOKIO GEN INS CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aishna Jain, Advocate for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 46930/2019 (delay of 6 days in filing) 1. This application seeks condonation of delay of six days in filing the appeal.2. 3.4. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The appeal is taken on record. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 842/2019 5.6. Issue notice. The learned counsel named above accepts notice on behalf of the insurance company.7. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal. MAC.APP. No.842/2019 Page 1 of 3 8. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 06.07.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.on account of non- granting of non-pecuniary compen...
Pankaj & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 30, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2969/2019 PANKAJ & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Durgesh Gupta, Advocate with versus... Petitioners No.1 to 8 & 10 in person THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anand Thumbayal, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with ASI Devender Singh, PS Aman Vihar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.1029/2016, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at police station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands settled amicably. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Mr.Anand Thumbayal, learned counsel for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that the petitioners as well as respondent No....
Inderjeet & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2465/2019 INDERJEET & ORS Date of decision: October 30, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Neeraj and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate for State/R-1 with SI Dhankar Singh, P.S.: Prasad Nagar... RESPONDENTS in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.0099/2019, under Sections 323/3IPC, registered at police station Prasad Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled.... RESPONDENTS are present in the court today and submit that they have settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Mr. Avi Singh, learned ASC for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that the status report has been filed and the facts W.P.(Crl.) 2465...
Sandeep @ Sunny @ Rohit & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 606/2018 SANDEEP @ SUNNY @ ROHIT & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mohd. Ahmed with Mr.Amit Vohra, versus Advocates. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Sumit, PS Aman Vihar. + CRL.L.P. 260/2018 AND STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Sumit, PS Aman Vihar. versus SANDEEP @ SUNNY @ ROHIT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mohd. Ahmed with Mr.Amit Vohra, Advocates. Reserved on :11. h October, 2019 Date of Decision:24. h October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. While Crl.A.606/2018 has been filed by appellant-convict Sandeep @ Sunny @ Rohit (husband of the deceased) and appellant-convict Deepak (brother-in-law of the deceased) challenging the judgment dated 31st January, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-04, North-West ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »